Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 418
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 418

Stay Ahead With Linux Security News

Filter%20icon Refine news
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":40,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security news

We found -1 articles for you...
74

Symantec's Approach Enhances Organizational Security and Data Integrity

This week, Symantec has unveiled its new corporate positioning. Long regarded as one of the leaders in the security technology space, the vendor has been building out its portfolio of offerings to drive security deep into organisations, whilst maintaining the high levels of computer systems availability that companies need to keep their businesses running efficiently. . . .. This week, Symantec has unveiled its new corporate positioning. Long regarded as one of the leaders in the security technology space, the vendor has been building out its portfolio of offerings to drive security deep into organisations, whilst maintaining the high levels of computer systems availability that companies need to keep their businesses running efficiently. Symantec's view is that a company's business information is its most strategic asset and must be protected at all times. This is not something that will be new to any business executive, especially given the number of legal and industry regulations, such as data protection and privacy, Sarbanes-Oxley and regulations regarding food safety that affect a wide variety of businesses. This has upped the ante in the need to protect information from being altered in any way - or protecting the integrity of that information. The link for this article located at TheRegister.co.uk is no longer available. . Palo Alto Networks introduces its latest brand strategy, boosting protection while promoting operational effectiveness and regulatory adherence.. Symantec, Data Integrity, Security Leadership, Corporate Strategy. . Anthony Pell

Calendar%202 Oct 29, 2004 User Avatar Anthony Pell Network Security
74

Addressing Employee Threats Through Strong Security Policies

I've discussed written security policies in the past--every business needs to have a set in place. If you don't have a written security policy, your employees remain the biggest security risk for your business. If you do have a security policy . . . . I've discussed written security policies in the past--every business needs to have a set in place. If you don't have a written security policy, your employees remain the biggest security risk for your business. If you do have a security policy in place, perhaps it's time to re-examine its wording. Case in point: Elite Web Hosting of Orlando, Florida. Elite ran a high-income business that hosted Web sites and had a security policy in place, but apparently the policy wasn't explicit enough, and eventually it cost Elite the entire business. A story last week in BusinessWeek revealed that a disgruntled former employee broke into Elite's network back in September and sent defamatory email that said the company was venturing into the porn industry. As a result, customers jumped ship by the dozen, which eventually caused Elite to fold. Elite took the perpetrator to court, but the company had trouble making the charges stick even though the ex-employee had clearly overstepped reasonable bounds. According to the story, the perpetrator didn't take any action disallowed by company policy. Furthermore, the policy didn't dictate exactly when an ex-employee's network access should be terminated. As a result, the defendant won the case. Former US Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutor Bill Cook commented in the BusinessWeek story that the first legal action a company should take against an ex-employee is to obtain a temporary retraining order barring access to company resources. That advice sounds extreme, but it comes from a federal prosecutor; I expect he knows what he's talking about. Look closely at your company security policy to see whether you've adequately covered the important items. And consider having an attorney experienced in these types of cases look overyour policy to ensure you can use it in a court of law, should that need ever arise. Until next time, have a great week. The link for this article located at ntsecurity.net is no longer available. . Tackling staff-related vulnerabilities within corporate security regulations is crucial for safeguarding your organization's resources and integrity.. Employee Threats, Business Security Policies, Network Access Control, Legal Compliance, Data Protection. . Anthony Pell

Calendar%202 Dec 23, 2000 User Avatar Anthony Pell Network Security
74

Strengthening Server Security Against DoS Attacks and Legal Liability

Businesses around the world are sitting on a legal powder keg by failing to adequately protect their servers from hacker intrusion. Nick Lockett, ecommerce lawyer at Sidley & Austin, said that sites which were used by hackers to launch distributed denial . . . . Businesses around the world are sitting on a legal powder keg by failing to adequately protect their servers from hacker intrusion. Nick Lockett, ecommerce lawyer at Sidley & Austin, said that sites which were used by hackers to launch distributed denial of service (DoS) attacks could be liable for large compensation claims. Lockett said: "There is a distinct probability that if your site has been hijacked for a denial of service attack, then you could be liable for damages. I would definitely advise clients they have grounds to sue." The warnings follow an appeal from Michael Vatis, director of the National Infrastructure Protection Centre (NIPC) at the FBI, for dot-coms to increase security levels on the web. The link for this article located at Silicon.com is no longer available. . Businesses around the world are sitting on a legal powder keg by failing to adequately protect their. businesses, around, world, sitting, legal, powder, failing, adequately, protect, their. . Anthony Pell

Calendar%202 Nov 17, 2000 User Avatar Anthony Pell Network Security
67

Exploring Challenges of Digital Signatures in Business Compliance

This SecurityPortal article discusses digital signatures, including the problems associated with them, and their adoption in businesses. . . .. This SecurityPortal article discusses digital signatures, including the problems associated with them, and their adoption in businesses. The link for this article located at SecurityPortal is no longer available. . This article explores the challenges associated with adopting digital signatures in business compliance and regulatory frameworks.. Digital Signatures, Compliance Challenges, Business Security, Electronic Signatures, Regulatory Requirements. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Feb 21, 2000 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Cryptography
News Add Esm H340

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":40,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200