Overly broad permissions can turn one compromised account into a much larger security problem. Learn how to reduce unnecessary access, review privileges, and apply least privilege across modern Linux systems. Review Linux Privileges×
Desktop Security
security advisory vulnerability
security advisory vulnerability GNOME is officially shortening its standard vulnerability disclosure window from 90 days to 30 days, a change that impacts upstream maintainers, downstream Linux distributions, and system administrators in how they handle software vulnerabilities. The policy shift, announced by long-time security coordinator Michael Catanzaro , addresses modern software patching realities and a growing influx of automated submissions. . Because GNOME is the default desktop environment on several major Linux...
Jul 21, 2026
Security Vulnerabilities security advisory moderate
security advisory moderate For organizations that run a self-hosted Git platform, it’s no longer just about hosting static code repositories. Today, Git servers are responsible for deployment pipelines, API tokens, SSH keys, package repositories, and the automation scripts that push code directly. Confirm that the upgrade addresses known vulnerabilities but also provides production environments. . That makes them trusted systems within the development environment and attractive targets for attackers looking to move...
Jul 20, 2026
Server Securitydata privacy automation
data privacy automation Every system admin has lived through the same Monday morning ritual. A queue of forty tickets, half of them password resets, permission errors, or disk space warnings that any experienced technician could resolve in under two minutes. The other half require actual judgment. For years, automation promised that software would eventually sort the two apart on its own. That promise is now being tested in production Linux environments. . Early results are reshaping how IT teams think about tier-1...
Jul 17, 2026
Privacydata collection automation
data collection automation You're running a web scraping project to collect pricing data from e-commerce sites. You set up a pool of datacenter proxies, launch your scripts, and within minutes — banned . CAPTCHAs everywhere. Your data pipeline stops before it really begins. . It's a frustrating scenario that plays out daily in ad verification, market research, and multi-account management. The website doesn't know you're doing legitimate research or monitoring. It just sees traffic coming from IP ranges it recognizes as...
Jul 17, 2026
Security Trends security advisory social engineering
security advisory social engineering Business Email Compromise used to be a numbers game — mass-blasted emails, broken English, an obvious "URGENT WIRE TRANSFER" subject line. That era is over. Generative AI has turned BEC into a tailored, low-noise operation that mimics writing style, voice, and even video presence. This piece looks at what's actually changed under the hood, what defenders are testing in response, and why so many organizations are still structurally unprepared for it. . The Infrastructure Problem Nobody Wants to...
Jul 17, 2026
Refine news
X Clear Filters
Get the latest News and Insights
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.
Community Poll
Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?
Trending News
Loading...
Explore Latest Linux Security news
We found 34 articles for you...
209
Linux securityopen source communitycollaborationBuilding Trust in Open Source for Enhanced Linux Security
Visibility gets attention, but trust builds staying power — especially in Linux, where the ecosystem depends on open collaboration and public review. A project can rack up stars and forks overnight, but it only lasts if people believe in how it’s run. . In open source, transparency is part of the code. It’s how developers learn, verify, and fix — often in real time. When that trust erodes, so does Linux security. Credibility is what keeps projects patched, contributors engaged, and vulnerabilities disclosed instead of hidden. The Power of Community Community isn’t a nice-to-have in open source. It’s infrastructure. It’s where development, testing, and accountability intersect. Closed software is transactional: users take what they’re given. Open source flips that model. Users become testers, testers become contributors, and contributors become maintainers. That shared cycle builds natural accountability, because every change can be seen and reviewed. Projects like Linux, Apache, and Kubernetes didn’t grow because of marketing. They grew because their communities believed in the mission and protected it. When people feel they have a voice, they’re not just using software — they’re defending Linux security. A healthy community doesn’t just make a project better. It makes it safer. Collaboration shortens the time between a bug and a fix, strengthening Linux security across the ecosystem. Content as a Bridge If community is the framework, content is the bridge that connects it to the outside world. In Linux and open source, clear communication isn’t branding — it’s maintenance. Documentation: A well-written setup guide or patch note shows care and helps users catch issues early. Tutorials and posts: They make projects discoverable and usable for the next wave of contributors. Release updates: A transparent changelog tells users what’s fixed, what’s known, and what’s still broken. Good content builds confidence. Ittells users the maintainers are present and paying attention. Outdated or incomplete documentation signals something far worse than neglect — it suggests no one is watching the code. Visibility matters, but clarity is what builds credibility, and credibility sustains Linux security over time. Transparency and Credibility Transparency is the foundation of open-source trust. It’s also one of the strongest defenses in Linux security. Credibility doesn’t come from being perfect. It comes from handling imperfection well. Maintainers who disclose vulnerabilities, explain incidents, and share fixes earn more respect than those who stay quiet. Linux projects that thrive over decades share one trait: consistency in communication. They don’t hide bugs or patch quietly. They publish, document, and invite review — because scrutiny is what keeps Linux security strong. Trust and the Security Layer Trust isn’t just good community practice — it’s a security control. In Linux environments, collaboration and transparency directly affect how fast vulnerabilities are found, verified, and fixed. When that trust weakens, gaps form. Patches take longer. Exploits spread faster. The difference between a responsible disclosure and a breach often comes down to communication, which directly affects Linux security across every distribution. Where Trust Strengthens Security Patch velocity: Trusted maintainers and clear update channels mean vulnerabilities are addressed faster, improving Linux security. Code review: Open peer review exposes logic flaws and backdoors that would go unnoticed in closed systems. Dependency validation: Verifying contributors and signed commits prevents supply-chain injection — a growing concern in Linux repositories. Incident response: Transparent postmortems and community coordination reduce repeat exploits. Every major Linux breach or supply-chain incident in recent years — from malicious package uploads to dependency takeovers— shared the same weakness: a break in trust. Projects that stay transparent, communicate quickly, and validate contributions don’t just look credible. They’re measurably stronger in Linux security. Trust doesn’t replace defense — it reinforces it. The Loop Between Collaboration and Credibility Collaboration and credibility feed each other. The more people contribute, the stronger a project becomes. The stronger it looks, the more people trust it. That loop is how Linux security evolved from a niche kernel to a global standard. Each pull request, patch, and code review sends a signal: this project is alive and protected. That visible movement draws in new eyes — developers, auditors, and defenders who keep the cycle going. It’s slow, but it’s durable. Communication, participation, and transparency keep it running long after attention fades. Open source has always been a trust experiment. In Linux, it’s also a security model — one that works when people keep showing up, contributing, and holding each other accountable. . Trust and transparency are crucial for maintaining Linux security through community engagement and collaboration in open source.. Linux community, open source trust, security collaboration, software transparency, project credibility. . MaK Ulac
Oct 18, 2025
•
Security Trends
209
open-sourceenterprisecollaborationThe Shift In Open Source Dynamics And Community Collaboration
"Open-source software's security and reliability aspects have played a significant role in its rise. The availability of source code to a large community of developers allows for thorough code review, which helps promptly identify and address potential security vulnerabilities. With a collective effort to maintain and enhance the software, the open-source approach ensures higher reliability and stability." . In the rapidly evolving world of technology, a seismic shift is taking place as the very ethos of the open-source market finds itself in flux. The cherished ideals of open community standards, collaboration, and crowdsourced innovation are now being challenged by powerful enterprises, many of them publicly-traded corporations, grappling with the balance between shareholder fiduciary responsibilities and community support. Red Hat, one of the longtime leaders in the open-source space, made some key announcements, which I got the chance to discuss with Gunnar Hellekson, the GM of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux business recently, that the company is changing how it approaches the open-source community as it relates to its main source of revenue, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). RHEL is an open-source operating system that thousands of organizations, institutions, and government departments use globally. Due to various factors, open-source software has gained significant prominence over the last decade with crowdsourced, open-code bases underpinning some of the fastest-growing software companies such as Redis, SUSE, MongoDB, and Elastic, among others. Open source refers to software that is released with its source code freely available to the public, enabling users to view, modify, and distribute it under specific open-source licenses. This approach has led to the emergence of a collaborative and transparent development model, resulting in widespread adoption and recognition. . In an environment where collaborative software development faces challenges, organizations must balance innovativeprogress with community support for ongoing growth. Open Source Software, Enterprise Linux, Community Collaboration. . Brittany Day
Aug 17, 2023
•
Security Trends
76
open sourceinteroperabilitycollaborationOpenWallet Foundation: Launch of Open-Source Digital Wallet Engine
In just six months, the OpenWallet Foundation (OWF) has grown from three to 350 global organizations, including trillion-dollar companies, which intend to collaborate to create and open-source engine that “anyone can use to build interoperable, secure, and privacy-protecting digital wallets.” . As the Linux Foundation Europe prepares to launch the OWF in early 2023, it held a panel discussion at the closed-source World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos. The hope that bringing together multiple vendors to build the engine will tackle head-on the issues of interoperability that have faced the digital identity sector for decades: “The common open source base layer of digital wallets promises to enhance interoperability between different digital wallets, ultimately avoiding lock-in to single digital wallets and serving the interests of digital wallet users and consumers,” states a Linux Foundation release. The project also intends to tackle the issues of legal and regulatory interoperability as well as the technical challenges. . The Linux Foundation Europe is preparing to introduce OWF, advocating for secure and interoperable digital wallets through open-source teamwork.. OpenWallet Foundation, Digital Wallet Engine, Open Source Collaboration. . Brittany Day
Feb 13, 2023
•
Organizations/Events
209
network securityMicrosoftcollaborationCanonical and Microsoft Strengthen Cloud Integration for Open Source
As IT workers continue their daunting job of protecting network users from bad guys, a few new tools might help stem the tide of vulnerabilities that continue to link open source and proprietary software. . Canonical and Microsoft reached a new agreement to make their two cloud platforms play nicer together. Meanwhile, Microsoft apologized to open-source software devs. But no apology was rendered for BitLocker locking out Linux users. Let’s get caught up on the latest open-source software industry news. . Canonical and Microsoft have established a fresh partnership aimed at improving integration between their cloud services. Discover further details.. Canonical Agreement, Microsoft Cloud, Open Source Tools, Network Security. . Brittany Day
Sep 14, 2022
•
Security Trends
76
security discussionsoftware securitycollaborationWhite House Summit: Addressing Log4j Security Issues With Tech Giants
Tech giants and federal agencies meet at the White House to discuss open-source software security, a response to the widespread Log4j vulnerability that’s worrying industry and cyber leaders. . Among the attendees are companies like Apple, Facebook and Google, as well as the Apache Software Foundation, which builds Log4j , a ubiquitous open-source logging framework for websites. “Building on the Log4j incident, the objective of this meeting is to facilitate an important discussion to improve the security of open source software — and to brainstorm how new collaboration could rapidly drive improvements,” a senior administration official said in advance of the meeting. . Top executives convene at the Pentagon to tackle the urgent privacy risks triggered by the new software vulnerabilities.. Open Source Security, Log4j Vulnerability, Tech Summit, Software Collaboration, Cybersecurity Initiatives. . Brittany Day
Jan 14, 2022
•
Organizations/Events
79
open sourcecollaborationsecurity foundationLinux Foundation Introduces OpenSSF To Streamline Security Projects
The Linux Foundation recently announced that it has launched yet another consortium - this time with the aim of bringing some order to multiple previous efforts to address open source security. The Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) will consolidate the efforts of the Core Infrastructure Initiative and the Open Source Security Coalition previously launched by GitHub. . In addition, various security projects launched by other founding governing board members including, Google, IBM, JPMorgan Chase, Microsoft, NCC Group, OWASP Foundation, Red Hat and others will be incorporated. Chris Aniszczyk, vice president of strategic and developer programs for The Linux Foundation, said the OpenSSF will reduce duplicated efforts across all these initiatives by first centralizing management and then bringing respective teams together to work on related projects. Additional founding OpenSSF members include ElevenPaths, GitLab, HackerOne, Intel, Okta, Purdue, SAFECode, StackHawk, Trail of Bits, Uber and VMware. The link for this article located at Security Boulevard is no longer available. . The Cloud Native Computing Foundation's latest initiative seeks to enhance and consolidate cloud-native security practices.. Open Source Foundation, Security Collaboration, Linux Initiatives. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Aug 06, 2020
•
Security Projects
82
integrationtechnologycollaborationIntegrating Technologists And Policymakers For Effective Solutions
Technology should not be separated from policy; however, in reality there is very little intersection between the two. "Policymakers need to recognize this danger, and to welcome a new generation of technologists to help solve the socio-technical policy problems of the 21st century. We need to create ways to speak tech to power -- and power needs to open the door and let technologists in." Read more about this issue and how it can be remedied in a great Schneier on Security article: . Technologists and policymakers largely inhabit two separate worlds. It's an old problem, one that the British scientist CP Snow identified in a 1959 essay entitled The Two Cultures . He called them sciences and humanities, and pointed to the split as a major hindrance to solving the world's problems. The essay was influential -- but 60 years later, nothing has changed. When Snow was writing, the two cultures theory was largely an interesting societal observation. Today, it's a crisis. Technology is now deeply intertwined with policy. We're building complex socio-technical systems at all levels of our society. Software constrains behavior with an efficiency that no law can match. It's all changing fast; technology is literally creating the world we all live in, and policymakers can't keep up. Getting it wrong has become increasingly catastrophic. Surviving the future depends in bringing technologists and policymakers together. Consider artificial intelligence (AI). This technology has the potential to augment human decision-making, eventually replacing notoriously subjective human processes with something fairer, more consistent, faster and more scalable. But it also has the potential to entrench bias and codify inequity, and to act in ways that are unexplainable and undesirable. It can be hacked in new ways, giving attackers from criminals and nation states new capabilities to disrupt and harm. How do we avoid the pitfalls of AI while benefiting from its promise? Or, more specifically, where and how should governmentstep in and regulate what is largely a market-driven industry? The answer requires a deep understanding of both the policy tools available to modern society and the technologies of AI. The link for this article located at Schneier on Security is no longer available. . Experts in technology and governance must join forces on societal and technical matters to tackle new challenges successfully.. Technology Integration, Policy Framework, Artificial Intelligence, Socio-Technical Systems. . Brittany Day
Nov 14, 2019
•
Government
79
data protectionLinux securitycollaborationMicrosoft And Allies Enhance Open Source Linux Security Stakeholders
With large corporations' contributions to open-source projects and adoption of open-source programs, your personal data could be kept more securely by big firms. . Microsoft is continuing its broad ongoing push to contribute with open source projects, joining the newly created Confidential Computing Consortium, an initiative launched by The Linux Foundation which aims to provide better security for data which is actually in use by apps on a computer, or in the cloud (as opposed to at rest, or not being used). Microsoft is far from alone in this endeavor, and is joined by Intel in the consortium, along with ARM, Baidu, Google Cloud, IBM, Red Hat and other tech giants. The link for this article located at Tech Radar is no longer available. . Google's dedication propels collaborative Android security initiatives with major industry players to enhance user privacy.. Open Source Initiatives,Linux Contributions,Corporate Data Security. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Aug 26, 2019
•
Security Projects
Get the latest News and Insights
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.
Community Poll
Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?
Trending News
Search Topics
Powered By
Linux Security - Your source for Top Linux News, Advisories, HOWTOs and Feature Releases
QUICK LINKS
subscribe to newsletters!
Like staying secure? So do we.
Sign up for updates, tips, and alerts!