Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 499
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 499

Stay Ahead With Linux Security News

Filter%20icon Refine news
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":40,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security news

We found -3 articles for you...
81

Exploring The New 'Annoy' Law's Impact On Internet Users

Q: So what does the rewritten law now say? The section as amended reads like this: "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.". . Q: So what does the rewritten law now say? The section as amended reads like this: 'Whoever...utiliz. rewritten, section, amended, reads, 'whoever, utiliz. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Feb 03, 2006 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Privacy
67

Understanding Compliance Hurdles for Crypto Providers Under New Law

The new Regulations of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication-Related Information Act could prove problematic for crypto providers, who face fines of up to R5 million if they fail to co-operate with the government. . .. The new Regulations of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication-Related Information Act could prove problematic for crypto providers, who face fines of up to R5 million if they fail to co-operate with the government . The new Act - which is not available to the public despite becoming law at the end of December - makes provision for stiff penalties for "decryption key holders" who fail to comply with a decryption order. These include 10-year jail sentences and R2 million fines for individuals, and fines of up to R5 million for companies. A decryption order can be issued to anyone thought to be able to assist in decrypting a message, such as an e-mail, intercepted under the Act. Thanks to a broad definition of a decryption key, which includes any algorithm, code or password that can put a message in intelligible form, such an order could also be issued to the companies that make or distribute crypto software. . Recent guidelines present obstacles for cryptocurrency firms navigating significant penalties enforced by surveillance legislation.. Interception Regulations, Crypto Providers, Compliance Challenges, Data Encryption, Communication Law. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Jan 20, 2003 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Cryptography
News Add Esm H340

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":40,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200