Network Security
system security Linux network
system security Linux network The romanticized image of the digital nomad – a laptop on a sun-drenched balcony – rarely accounts for the actual friction of maintaining a professional development environment on the move. . The friction is amplified with Linux. We are looking for a setup that respects our kernel configurations, handles volatile network handovers, and maintains a strict security posture without the hand-holding of a consumer-grade OS – so, put simply, more than just a laptop and a sunny deck. The hardware is...
May 26, 2026
Server Securityopen-source Linux administration
open-source Linux administration Cron has existed in Unix and Linux environments for decades, handling backups, cleanup scripts, patching jobs, log rotation, monitoring tasks, and other maintenance work that administrators do not want to run manually. Most Linux servers rely on it constantly, which is exactly why attackers continue abusing it for persistence after a system has already been compromised. . Persistence through cron is not complicated. Attackers do not need a rootkit or advanced malware framework to maintain...
May 25, 2026
Vendors/Productssecurity breach linux
security breach linux A major internal repository breach at GitHub has exposed a critical and overlooked blind spot in Linux supply chain security. Kernel exploits, exposed SSH services, weak firewall rules, and vulnerable daemons dominated the Linux threat model for years, and in many environments, they still matter. But recent supply-chain incidents involving GitHub ecosystems, npm packages, and malicious developer tooling point somewhere else entirely: the developer workstation. . The breach matters because...
May 21, 2026
Security Trends access control multi-tenant
access control multi-tenant Linux administrators often face an ugly choice in the cloud: prioritize convenience and cost-efficiency by sharing infrastructure, or sacrifice those benefits for the sake of total isolation. Most modern Linux workloads don't live on their own private servers anymore. They live in shared environments like Kubernetes clusters, where multiple teams and services run side-by-side. It sounds efficient, and it usually is. . But cloud isolation isn't as ironclad as it looks on the diagram. If you...
May 21, 2026
Vendors/Productsincident response cloud security
incident response cloud security Managed Extended Detection and Response (MXDR) has become one of the most sought-after security services in the enterprise market — and with good reason. It promises the holy grail: broad visibility across endpoints, network, cloud, email, and identity, combined with the 24/7 human expertise most organizations simply cannot build in-house. . However, the rapid growth of the market has produced a wide range of providers whose capabilities vary considerably beneath the surface. Choosing the...
May 19, 2026
Refine news
X Clear Filters
Get the latest News and Insights
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.
Community Poll
What got you started with Linux?
Loading...
Explore Latest Linux Security news
We found 2 articles for you...
209
security measuresinsider threatopen source securityInsider Threats and Security Measures for Open Source Ecosystems
The recent discovery of a backdoor in XZ Utils , a widely used Linux tool, raises concerns about the security of the open-source ecosystem. While the open-source community successfully reacted to remove the malware , this event highlights the presence of spies within their midst and the need for stricter security measures. . Potential solutions exist, such as external certification processes or code reviews by external companies, but implementing them can be challenging. Understanding & Overcoming Insider Threats in Open-Source Environments The power of the open source community to quickly respond to crises like the XZ Utils backdoor must be highlighted, as exemplified by ethical hackers ' prompt removal of the malware. However, this also raises critical questions about the overall security and trust within the open-source ecosystem. One intriguing point to consider is the comparison between this incident and an internal corporate hack carried out by a disgruntled employee. It suggests that just as organizations face insider threats, the open source community may also be vulnerable to similar espionage acts. This analogy sparks curiosity and forces organizations to consider the implications of insider threats in a community built on trust. Recent attacks have raised thought-provoking questions regarding the need for stricter security measures in the open-source ecosystem. Implementing an external certification process or having external companies conduct code reviews and certify software could help reduce risk. However, these approaches have potential complications and legal liabilities. This tradeoff leads businesses to critically assess the balance between security measures and the fundamental principles of open-source collaboration. Organizations must also consider risks from within, where trusted users or contributors may abuse access or introduce malicious activity, making internal fraud prevention a critical part of securing Linux and open-source environments. Thisincident has significant implications for security practitioners, particularly Linux admins, infosec professionals, internet security enthusiasts, and sysadmins. It challenges them to reevaluate their trust in contributors and consider implementing additional security training and measures to mitigate insider threats. CISOs and cybersecurity teams must always consider the potential risks insiders pose and explore ways to conduct internal source code reviews on open-source software. Looking ahead, the long-term consequences of this incident could result in a more cautious approach to open-source collaboration. Change will come slowly, and the open-source community may need to adapt to evolving threats by implementing new security measures and creating awareness of insider risks. Improving Open Source Security: Our Final Thoughts The recent XZ Utils backdoor incident and its implications for the open-source ecosystem highlight the need for security practitioners to remain vigilant and proactive in addressing insider threats while questioning the potential consequences of implementing stricter security measures. As security practitioners, reflecting on the vulnerabilities within open-source environments and considering how you can contribute to a safer and more secure community is critical. . Mitigating insider threats in open-source environments requires implementing strict code audits, certification processes, and fostering a transparent community culture to report issues.. insider threat, open source security, ethical hacking, security measures, code review. . Brittany Day
May 08, 2024
•
Security Trends
76
open sourcesecurity awarenesssoftware securityLinus Torvalds Discusses Hardware Errors and Community Trust at Summit
At The Linux Foundation's Open Source Summit North America , Linus Torvalds, the creator of Linux, discussed various topics related to Linux development and the challenges the open-source community faces. Torvalds addressed hardware errors, malicious developers, and the hype surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI). . This analysis explores the implications of Torvalds' statements and their impact on Linux administrators, infosec professionals, internet security enthusiasts, and sysadmins. What Critical Points Did Linus Torvalds Address at the Open Source Summit? One of the intriguing points raised by Torvalds is the issue of hardware errors and the slow response from hardware manufacturers. He expressed frustration about the time it takes for hardware fixes to be implemented, stating, "We have five generations of hardware that we can't fix after the fact, and it will take another couple of years before the actual new hardware [arrives] that can help you work around the problem." This raises questions about the long-term consequences of relying on hardware solutions that cannot be easily updated or patched . It also highlights the importance of proactive hardware design and development to prevent security vulnerabilities. Another notable discussion revolved around the threat of malicious developers infiltrating open-source projects. Torvalds recounted an incident in which attempts were made to insert bad patches into the Linux kernel . While the open-source nature of Linux allowed these attempts to be identified and thwarted, Torvalds emphasized the importance of community vigilance, stating, "A healthy community is the best defense." This brings attention to the need for trust in the open-source community and the potential impact on the overall security of open-source projects. It is also ironic that Torvalds and Dirk Hohndel, Verizon's Head of the Open Source Program Office, expressed skepticism towards AI hype. Torvalds dismissed AI as "autocorrect on steroids," highlighting the needfor caution when embracing AI technologies. This raises questions about the vulnerabilities that may arise from overreliance on AI solutions in security and administration. Additionally, Torvalds acknowledged the potential benefits of AI in bug detection and tool development but emphasized the importance of waiting for the technology to mature and prove its worth. Our Final Thoughts on Torvalds' Statements This article's critical analysis of Torvalds' perspectives reminds Linux administrators, infosec professionals, and sysadmins that no technology or community is immune to challenges and potential threats. We aim to spark curiosity and encourage readers to question the long-term consequences of hardware limitations, the trustworthiness of open-source projects, and the possible risks associated with emerging technologies like AI. As technical practitioners, it is vital to stay updated on these issues , engage in community support, and approach new technologies with a critical eye, ensuring the security and stability of the systems we manage. . At the recent Open Source Summit, Linus Torvalds voiced critical concerns about hardware reliability and trust in the open source community, stressing transparency and collaboration.. Open Source Summit, Hardware Errors, Linux Development, Community Trust, AI Security. . Anthony Pell
Apr 18, 2024
•
Organizations/Events
209
security practicesopen source securitycommunity trustExamining Trust and Transparency in Open-Source Security Ecosystem
A common misconception is that open-source software is less secure than proprietary software. To help dispel this myth, we'll highlight the benefits of open-source software in terms of security and show that the trust placed in the open-source community is well-founded. . How Secure Is Open-Source Software? Open-source software is ubiquitous, with 90% and 98% of the world's software being open-source. A community member emphasizes the importance of trust in open-source software: "We're all taking code written by other people—standing on the shoulders of giants—and implicitly trusting every author, maintainer, and contributor that's come before us." This quote should resonate with security practitioners, reminding them of the inherent trust placed in the open-source community when utilizing their code. The positive effect of source code transparency in open-source software should be noted. The network effect of many eyes on the source code leads to vulnerabilities being identified and remediated faster. Unsurprisingly, 90% of the known exploited vulnerabilities are proprietary software, even though around 97% of all software is open-source. This data challenges the misconception that proprietary software is inherently more secure, highlighting the benefits of community-driven security practices in Open Source. High-profile vulnerabilities like Log4shell must be acknowledged, but these cases demonstrate the power of open-source security rather than failure. In the case of Log4shell, the maintainers were able to patch the vulnerability and roll out fixes in a matter of days, showcasing the responsive nature of the open-source community's security practices. However, enterprises often lag in responding to such vulnerabilities, with more than one in three Log4j applications still using vulnerable versions. The Importance of Trust in the Open-Source Ecosystem Trust is crucial in the open-source ecosystem, particularly concerning Linux distributions. Linux distributions play a pivotal rolein establishing trust by pioneering approaches to software supply chains and establishing strict methods for vetting package maintainers. Debian is a notable example, using the PGP key sign system to codify trust within the distribution. However, concerns about trust in the modern software supply chain exist regardless. The shift to programming language package managers and Docker images has introduced challenges in ensuring trust and security. The lack of curation in language package managers has led to concerns that anyone can upload a package, and Docker images have introduced a transitive trust issue. Docker's efforts to address the trust gap with Verified Builds are commendable; however, Helm and its federated model have introduced complexities. These trust issues have significant implications for security practitioners. There is a need for greater awareness of vulnerabilities introduced through transitive dependencies and the difficulty of detecting and patching malicious software packages. Efforts to close the gaps in software supply chain security are ongoing, but questions remain about the scalability and effectiveness of these measures. Our Final Thoughts on Open-Source Security This article aims to challenge misconceptions about the security of open-source software and highlight the benefits of source code transparency and community-driven security practices. Analyzing trust within the open-source ecosystem and the potential risks in the modern software supply chain should provide valuable insights for security practitioners. As security practitioners, it is essential to understand the trust models and potential vulnerabilities within the open-source software we rely on and actively participate in efforts to strengthen software supply chain security. . Open-source software (OSS) is often undervalued for its security benefits; its public code enables diverse scrutiny, enhancing vulnerability detection and resolution. Open-Source Security, Code Transparency, Community Trust, SoftwareSupply Chain Security. . Brittany Day
Mar 15, 2024
•
Security Trends
209
open sourceopen source communitycommunity trustUniversity of Minnesota Faces Scrutiny Over Research Ethics Issues
University of Minnesota researchers' recent "experiment" - which involved sneaking vulnerabilities into the Linux kernel code base and then effectively bragging about it in the name of research - highlights the role of ethics in cybersecurity. . Nobody wants to be a proverbial guinea pig; least of all, developers donating their time and energy to making the world a better place. You’d think with all the recent discussion about consent, researchers would more carefully observe ethical boundaries. Yet, a group of researchers from the University of Minnesota not only crossed the line but ran across it, screaming defiantly the whole way. In response, the Linux Foundation, which is the core of the open source community, took the unprecedented step of banning the entire University of Minnesota from contributing to the Linux kernel. The open source community is built upon the principles of trust, cooperation and transparency. This group donates time and high-value industry skills to create, maintain and improve free and widely adopted software in the interest of making technology more accessible. Linux is a widely used operating system found in everything from servers to cell phones. The link for this article located at Security Boulevard is no longer available. . Delving into the moral considerations surrounding a contentious cybersecurity research initiative focused on weaknesses within Linux systems.. Cybersecurity Ethics, Linux Kernel Research, Ethical Practices, Community Trust. . Brittany Day
May 20, 2021
•
Security Trends
78
security softwarevulnerability scannerNessusNessus 3.0 Licensing Shift: Impact On Open Source Security Community
"Here's the danger we are running into," said Alan Shimel, Chief Strategy Officer for StillSecure. "People contribute resources to these communities, whether it be time, money, or code. When they see everything they give converted for the commercial success of an individual rather than as a community as a whole, how long do you think they are going to want to keep giving?" . Nessus, maker of one of the most popular open-source vulnerability scanner programs available, changed its licensing agreement with the release of version 3.0.0 on December 12, causing a bit of a stir among security industry players that rely on the code as a component of their commercial solutions. The latest version is not available under the GPL, but instead will be sold as a commercial product. The recent licensing changes affect a broad spectrum of users, including corporations, the open-source community, and even businesses using services that use Nessus. So what exactly does this mean for open source? Is it the end of the age of innocence? What options do interested parties have going forward? The link for this article located at Linux Insider is no longer available. . The change in Nexus's licensing has sparked worries regarding the trajectory of community-driven development and the faith users have in the ecosystem.. Open Source Vulnerability Scanners, Nessus Licensing, Community Contributions, Security Software. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Dec 22, 2005
•
Vendors/Products
78
security riskstrust managementcommunity trustUnderstanding The Role Of Transparency In Open-Source Integrity
Some people would have you believe this is monumental or out of the ordinary -- a group that distributes software experiencing a compromise, then letting everybody know about it and warning of the potential risks. Those that prance about in Penguin-embroidered cheerleader tops and yellow and black tutus suggest between pom-pom waves that no commercial vendor would ever be as candid.. . .. Some people would have you believe this is monumental or out of the ordinary -- a group that distributes software experiencing a compromise, then letting everybody know about it and warning of the potential risks. Those that prance about in Penguin-embroidered cheerleader tops and yellow and black tutus suggest between pom-pom waves that no commercial vendor would ever be as candid. I think that's wrong. When you get owned, somebody is going to announce it, so there's no reason for anyone -- commercial vendors included -- to try and keep it under wraps. People talk. This is our nature, and inevitably the gossip subway is going to go rumbling down the tracks, out of control, until it breaks through the surface. Moreover, open projects are in a situation that uniquely requires immediate disclosure of a compromise. A project that does not publicly admit a compromise not only risks the integrity of the project, but also risks the trust that users put in the project. And in current form, open-source projects are built entirely on trust. This trust in open-source generally springs from the practice of distributing the source code for applications. But users who download from the project can't be assured that the application hasn't been tampered with, unless they actually read through the source code. There's no guarantee that the source is actually the source that was intended. The link for this article located at is no longer available. . Open-source initiatives need to prioritize clarity and reliability even when facing challenges in program dissemination.. Open Source Integrity, Project Transparency, Community Trust. .LinuxSecurity.com Team
Dec 17, 2003
•
Vendors/Products
78
open sourceinteroperabilitycommunity trustTrust and Standards in Open Source Software Reliability
The issue is more than one of semantics. If open source is to develop as a mainstay of computing, supporters say, users must have faith that products entered into the open-source community meet commonly accepted criteria. "The open . . .. The issue is more than one of semantics. If open source is to develop as a mainstay of computing, supporters say, users must have faith that products entered into the open-source community meet commonly accepted criteria. "The open source community's peer-review process directly serves the interests of current and future users," says Eric Raymond, head of the Open Software Initiative. "It does so by holding vendors up to a high standard for reliability, security, interoperability, and transparency. Some vendors (like IBM and SGI) are up to this challenge and are embracing open source. Some are not." The link for this article located at ZD Net News -- Â Â is no longer available. . Investigating the impact of confidence in open-source software on its dependability and benchmarks in technology.. Open Source Standards, Software Reliability, Vendor Practices, Community Trust, Interoperability. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Mar 30, 2000
•
Vendors/Products
Get the latest News and Insights
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.
Community Poll
What got you started with Linux?
Search Topics
Powered By
Linux Security - Your source for Top Linux News, Advisories, HOWTOs and Feature Releases
QUICK LINKS
subscribe to newsletters!
Like staying secure? So do we.
Sign up for updates, tips, and alerts!
Discover faster search, smarter navigation, and deeper Linux security insights. Read More