A new study on "US and European Corporate Privacy Practices" was released two days ago, and as I constantly monitor the topic knowing EU's stricter information sharing and privacy violations laws comparing to the U.S, thought you might find this useful. To sum up the findings: "European companies are much more likely to have privacy practices that restrict or limit the sharing of customer or employees' sensitive personal information and are also more likely to provide employees with choice or consent on how information is used or shared," said David Bender, head of White & Case's Global Privacy practice." still at the "sharing sensitive information is bad" promotional stage, I feel the research reasonable points out the lack of a systematic technical approach, bureaucracy can also be an issue, but with so many CERTs in Europe there's potential for lots of developments I think. Established in 2004, ENISA is the current body overseeing and guiding the Community towards data protection practices -- slowly, but steadily gaining grounds. . "But the research also revealed that US companies are engaging in more security and control-oriented compliance activities than their European counterparts. As a result, US corporations scored higher in five of the eight areas of corporate privacy practice." - structured implementation on a technical level, that is people auditing networks and being accountable in case of not doing so, and privacy policies by default. The link for this article located at Dancho Danchev is no longer available. . Explore the distinctions in corporate privacy protocols between the US and Europe highlighted by a recent analysis.. Corporate Privacy Practices, European Data Protection, US Compliance, Privacy Comparisons, Security Regulations. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Identity theft is a growing problem in the U.S., with complaints rising 73 percent from 2001 to 2002. But there's a mistaken impression that identity theft is carried out merely by rogue hackers. That's not the case. If . . . . Identity theft is a growing problem in the U.S., with complaints rising 73 percent from 2001 to 2002. But there's a mistaken impression that identity theft is carried out merely by rogue hackers. That's not the case. If your credit history is stolen from a database, the thief is less likely to be a hacker than an employee of the company that owns the database. Yet businesses are still lax when it comes to policing insiders who have access to confidential data. I believe this crime will not stop until the government steps in to regulate corporate privacy policies, and companies that handle your personal data are held liable for any abuses carried out by their employees. Identity theft has been making headlines for months. Last fall, the feds broke what may be the largest identity theft case in U.S. history (total losses from the case are estimated at $2.7 million). Federal investigators arrested in November 2002 a help-desk employee of a third-party credit agency, Teledata Communications, who was able to access confidential information about the company's corporate clients. The link for this article located at ZDNet is no longer available. . Fraudulent identity usage has become a pressing concern in America, with a staggering 73% increase in reported incidents over the past twelve months.. identity theft, corporate privacy, insider threats, data breach, privacy regulations. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.