Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 498
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 498

Stay Ahead With Linux Security News

Filter%20icon Refine news
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":40,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security news

We found -2 articles for you...
77

Best Practices For Detecting Rootkits And Cyber Threat Awareness

Rootkits are dangerous-perhaps the most dangerous piece of software in an attacker's arsenal. But competent policies and a sound architecture offer more protection than you might think. . Rootkit detection software can help security architects expose rootkits and any other malicious components they might be hiding, including adware, keystroke loggers, and other software that might compromise sensitive information or otherwise harm the enterprise. Administrators must be trained to use rootkit-specific detection tools properly and to correctly interpret their output. They may produce false negatives, which could lead to compromised PCs being labeled as "clean." One class of rootkit-specific tools may require an administrator's physical presence at the compromised computer. The link for this article located at IT Architect is no longer available. . Uncovering trojans is vital; learn about the function of scanning tools and ways to safeguard networks efficiently.. Rootkit Detection, Malware Protection, Attack Prevention, Security Architecture. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Feb 22, 2006 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Server Security
83

Spyware Threat Assessment: Anti-Spyware Tools Fail to Detect Attacks

With the threat of a sophisticated spyware attack looming, a renowned security researcher says the most popular detection and removal tools "fail miserably" at addressing the growing spyware/malware scourge. . . .. With the threat of a sophisticated spyware attack looming, a renowned security researcher says the most popular detection and removal tools "fail miserably" at addressing the growing spyware/malware scourge. Just days after hackers seized control of a banner ad server and used it to load malicious programs on vulnerable machines, researcher Eric Howes issued failing grades on all anti-spyware scanners he tested during a two-week stretch in October. Howes, a graduate student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, found that the best-performing anti-spyware scanner failed to detect about 25 percent of the "critical" files and registry entries installed by the malicious programs. "One thing I found out for sure is that no single scanner removes everything," Howes said in an interview with eWEEK.com. "I had an inkling before doing the test that the results would come back like this. But it still is disappointing to find that the tools, in many cases, are basically useless." "The anti-spyware tools missed things that simply reinstalled what was deleted," Howes said, likening it to a cat-and-mouse game being won by the bad guys. The link for this article located at eweek.com is no longer available. . With the threat of a sophisticated spyware attack looming, a renowned security researcher says the m. threat, sophisticated, spyware, attack, looming, renowned, security, researcher. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Nov 24, 2004 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Hacks/Cracks
77

NIPC: DDoS Tool Update For Mstream Detection Severity: Critical

The potential represented by the "mstream" Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) exploit is a serious and continuing threat. This advisory provides an update to a previously delivered NIPC DDoS detection tool that now allows users to identify the presence of . . .. The potential represented by the "mstream" Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) exploit is a serious and continuing threat. This advisory provides an update to a previously delivered NIPC DDoS detection tool that now allows users to identify the presence of mstream on host systems. The NIPC recommends that all computer network owners and organizations examine their systems for evidence of DDoS tools, including mstream. The link for this article located at NIPC is no longer available. . Explore the capabilities of the NIPC DDoS tool in swiftly detecting the prominent mstream vulnerability.. mstream DDoS detection,NIPC detection tool,cybersecurity update. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 May 26, 2000 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Server Security
News Add Esm H340

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":40,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200