Phishing is not hacking. Users were tricked more than violated ... And other lessons from yesterday's made-up story. "Gmail Hack" was scattered across media headlines yesterday, inciting the rumor that Google's popular email platform had been the victim of a cyber-attack.. It wasn't true. Google was not hacked, a company spokesman tells Fast Company. Some users were duped into supplying passwords to fraudulent emails masquerading as trustworthy sources (known as phishing)--a very common occurance.. Decoding the reality of the Instagram 'breach' as a social engineering tactic, exposing user naiveté and press exaggeration.. Phishing Awareness, Email Safety, Cybersecurity Lessons. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Bayesian filtering works very well, measured at greater than 99.9 percent accuracy at detecting spam and other unwanted e-mails. In his paper, "A Plan For Spam", Paul Graham popularized Bayesian filtering on word groupings to prevent spammers from getting their messages . . . . Bayesian filtering works very well, measured at greater than 99.9 percent accuracy at detecting spam and other unwanted e-mails. In his paper, "A Plan For Spam", Paul Graham popularized Bayesian filtering on word groupings to prevent spammers from getting their messages across. After all, how can you sell a new genital enlargement cream without using the words "enlargement" or "bigger" in conjunction with certain other words? Eventually, spammers are reduced to incoherence through vocabulary starvation. What if I do want discount prescription offers? Bayesian filters will "learn" that, too. Statistical filtering can be very specific to a given user's requirements. . Bayesian classification achieves more than 99.9% precision in filtering out unwanted emails by utilizing probabilistic assessment.. Bayesian Filtering, Email Security, Spam Detection, Statistical Analysis. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Make no mistake about it -- spam and viruses are deliberate, malicious assaults on our systems that often work together to penetrate and compromise our networks. A popular dirty trick by spammers is to plant malicious code in their spew to . . . . Make no mistake about it -- spam and viruses are deliberate, malicious assaults on our systems that often work together to penetrate and compromise our networks. A popular dirty trick by spammers is to plant malicious code in their spew to exploit recipients' systems. Remember jeem.mail.pv? Proxy-guzu? These sweet little Trojans, just two of many, compromise Windows boxes and turn them into spam servers. The moral here? Keep spam off your network and it will be considerably more secure. While the vast majority of viruses, Trojans, worms, and other malware are aimed at Windows, users of Linux, Unix, BSD, and MacOS should not be complacent. You never know where the next exploit will be aimed. We'll look at server-level defenses in part 1 of combating the two-headed monster, while part 2 will cover the client side, including how to decode mail headers and recognize malicious code. No matter how much we cajole, nag, pester, plead, implore, educate, and even threaten, it's inevitable that our users will continue to open malicious attachments. Why bother with a firewall at all when email rolls out the red carpet to viruses, worms, and Trojan horses? Anti-virus software and gateway software that scan message content and mime types are important and essential, but they simply can't catch everything. And even when users are well-behaved, certain email clients will happily execute malicious code without any user intervention. All the spam has to do is land in the user's inbox. The link for this article located at CrossNodes is no longer available. . In today's digital world, vulnerabilities invite spam and viruses, risking data breaches and financial loss. Antivirus software, firewalls, and user education are vital for robust security. Email Safety,CybersecurityThreats,Spam Protection. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.