Network Security
system security Linux network
system security Linux network The romanticized image of the digital nomad – a laptop on a sun-drenched balcony – rarely accounts for the actual friction of maintaining a professional development environment on the move. . The friction is amplified with Linux. We are looking for a setup that respects our kernel configurations, handles volatile network handovers, and maintains a strict security posture without the hand-holding of a consumer-grade OS – so, put simply, more than just a laptop and a sunny deck. The hardware is...
May 26, 2026
Server Securityopen-source Linux administration
open-source Linux administration Cron has existed in Unix and Linux environments for decades, handling backups, cleanup scripts, patching jobs, log rotation, monitoring tasks, and other maintenance work that administrators do not want to run manually. Most Linux servers rely on it constantly, which is exactly why attackers continue abusing it for persistence after a system has already been compromised. . Persistence through cron is not complicated. Attackers do not need a rootkit or advanced malware framework to maintain...
May 25, 2026
Vendors/Productssecurity breach linux
security breach linux A major internal repository breach at GitHub has exposed a critical and overlooked blind spot in Linux supply chain security. Kernel exploits, exposed SSH services, weak firewall rules, and vulnerable daemons dominated the Linux threat model for years, and in many environments, they still matter. But recent supply-chain incidents involving GitHub ecosystems, npm packages, and malicious developer tooling point somewhere else entirely: the developer workstation. . The breach matters because...
May 21, 2026
Security Trends access control multi-tenant
access control multi-tenant Linux administrators often face an ugly choice in the cloud: prioritize convenience and cost-efficiency by sharing infrastructure, or sacrifice those benefits for the sake of total isolation. Most modern Linux workloads don't live on their own private servers anymore. They live in shared environments like Kubernetes clusters, where multiple teams and services run side-by-side. It sounds efficient, and it usually is. . But cloud isolation isn't as ironclad as it looks on the diagram. If you...
May 21, 2026
Vendors/Productsincident response cloud security
incident response cloud security Managed Extended Detection and Response (MXDR) has become one of the most sought-after security services in the enterprise market — and with good reason. It promises the holy grail: broad visibility across endpoints, network, cloud, email, and identity, combined with the 24/7 human expertise most organizations simply cannot build in-house. . However, the rapid growth of the market has produced a wide range of providers whose capabilities vary considerably beneath the surface. Choosing the...
May 19, 2026
Refine news
X Clear Filters
Get the latest News and Insights
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.
Community Poll
What got you started with Linux?
Loading...
Explore Latest Linux Security news
We found 4 articles for you...
81
policy complianceemployee privacycorporate policyDiscrepancy Between Employer Policies And Employee Privacy Standards
Your organization has a computer and Internet use policy. Fine. It. However, there is a genuine divergence between what companies say and what they do. There is also a divergence between what employees regurgitate about their expectations of privacy (corporate mantra) and how they actually act. My own answer to the question, "do I have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the workplace?" The link for this article located at is no longer available. . The gap between corporate privacy policies and employee expectations grows as monitoring practices clash with desires for personal autonomy and transparency. Employee Privacy, Corporate Ethics, Workplace Compliance. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Nov 07, 2006
•
Privacy
81
employee privacyemail monitoringCalifornia lawCalifornia Assembly Requires Notification for Email Monitoring Law
California's Assembly has voted to require the state's employers to inform their workers in writing if email and other Internet activity is monitored at the office. If it becomes law, supporters said the bill would place the state at the forefront of protecting employee privacy online and may serve as a model for similar bills in other states. . . .. Californian employers will have to notify staff in writing if their email and Internet activity is monitored, if a new bill becomes law California's Assembly has voted to require the state's employers to inform their workers in writing if email and other Internet activity is monitored at the office. If it becomes law, supporters said the bill would place the state at the forefront of protecting employee privacy online and may serve as a model for similar bills in other states. Critics said it would burden employers and is unnecessary because employees already assume online activities at work are monitored. Business groups also opposed the bill because any violation of it would be considered a misdemeanour. The link for this article located at ZDNet.co.uk is no longer available. . Under a recent legislative proposal, businesses in California are required to inform employees regarding the oversight of their email and online activities.. California Privacy Policy, Employee Surveillance Notification, Workplace Regulations. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Aug 19, 2004
•
Privacy
81
data protectionemployee monitoringemployee privacyUK Privacy Code Affects Employee Monitoring Practices and Policies
Businesses in the UK, including U.S. firms with branch offices there, may soon face limits on their ability to monitor employee Web surfing and e-mail activity under a new privacy code due to be released by a government body in the . . . . Businesses in the UK, including U.S. firms with branch offices there, may soon face limits on their ability to monitor employee Web surfing and e-mail activity under a new privacy code due to be released by a government body in the next two months. The UK privacy protections also illustrate the sharp difference in privacy approaches that exist between the U.S. and European nations, many of which have stringent privacy rules. The code, which sets out workplace privacy rights, will call for employers to spell out their monitoring policies to employees and conduct monitoring that is "proportionate" to the risk posed by the employee activity. The link for this article located at CNN is no longer available. . Companies in the UK, along with American enterprises, could encounter fresh restrictions on worker surveillance due to forthcoming privacy laws.. UK Privacy Code, Employee Monitoring, Data Protection, Monitoring Policies, Workplace Rights. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Apr 17, 2002
•
Privacy
74
data breachsecurity incidentpersonal informationGlobal Crossing Data Breach: 8000 Employees Impacted By Theft
A disgruntled former IT employee at telecommunications firm Global Crossing Holdings Ltd. has been posting the names, Social Security numbers and birth dates of company employees on his Web site. The postings have appeared periodically over the past five months. . . . . A disgruntled former IT employee at telecommunications firm Global Crossing Holdings Ltd. has been posting the names, Social Security numbers and birth dates of company employees on his Web site. The postings have appeared periodically over the past five months. They include data on all employees on Global Crossing's payroll as of Sept. 1, according to an internal memo. The company currently has about 8,000 employees. An attorney for Bermuda-based Global Crossing said the company is pursuing both civil and criminal action against the former IT worker. Both the FBI and the police department in Beverly Hills, Calif., where the information is alleged to have been stolen, are on the case. The link for this article located at ComputerWorld is no longer available. . Displeased former staff member leaks confidential information concerning Global Crossing workforce, jeopardizing both privacy and security.. Data Breach, Employee Theft, Telecommunications Security. . Anthony Pell
Feb 12, 2002
•
Network Security
81
system administrationsecurity concernsemployee privacyExploring Ethical Implications Of Anonymizing Proxy Usage
The debate over the ethics of using an employer's system to surf the Net is ongoing. Employee privacy rights and whether or not the company owns the contents of employees' machines are just two facets of it. The opportunity for system . . . . The debate over the ethics of using an employer's system to surf the Net is ongoing. Employee privacy rights and whether or not the company owns the contents of employees' machines are just two facets of it. The opportunity for system administrators to view personal information disclosed through Web surfing may also pose serious security concerns. Many of the ill-designed Web interfaces embed the usernames and passwords in the URL string. Concealing the URL of a visited site from prying eyes makes a lot of sense. The link for this article located at is no longer available. . The debate over the ethics of using an employer's system to surf the Net is ongoing. Employee privac. debate, ethics, using, employer's, system, ongoing, employee, privac. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Sep 21, 2001
•
Privacy
81
internet monitoringemployee privacyjudicial oversightJudges Protest Federal Oversight of Online Activities by Agency
Privacy advocates hope a simmering dispute within the federal judiciary over Internet use will spark changes to federal laws on employer monitoring of company networks. A group of senior West Coast judges, angry that their online activity is monitored by a . . . . Privacy advocates hope a simmering dispute within the federal judiciary over Internet use will spark changes to federal laws on employer monitoring of company networks. A group of senior West Coast judges, angry that their online activity is monitored by a federal agency here that administers the court system, have suggested the scrutiny may be illegal and for one week earlier this year disabled the monitoring system in protest. The link for this article located at ZDNet News is no longer available. . Privacy advocates hope a simmering dispute within the federal judiciary over Internet use will spark. privacy, advocates, simmering, dispute, within, federal, judiciary, internet, spark. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Aug 09, 2001
•
Privacy
81
data privacyinformation sharingmonitoring practicesExploring Monitoring, Privacy, And Data Sharing In Today’s Environment
We give out personal information every day. Between our birth and death records, we dispense an avalanche of information to the government, businesses and other organizations in return for employment or services. For example, we provide detailed information to schools, banks, . . . . We give out personal information every day. Between our birth and death records, we dispense an avalanche of information to the government, businesses and other organizations in return for employment or services. For example, we provide detailed information to schools, banks, state departments of motor vehicles, health providers and insurers, and in return we receive an education, bank accounts, a driver's license and health care. We also establish relationships and accounts with vendors and service providers in exchange for discounts and promotions. Businesses thrive on having such customer information. In turn, we are observed and monitored every day. Only the high cost of persistent, systematic surveillance systems prohibits their widespread use in public places today. And without the aid of machines, the observers quickly forget what they saw and rarely collect and correlate data for later use. In the future, security checks like the one at Super Bowl XXXV -- in which hidden cameras scanned the faces of arriving spectators and compared their portraits with photos of alleged criminals -- may be commonplace. When the setting changes from the public to the private-sector workplace, however, monitoring takes on a different significance. Enterprises can and often should monitor their employees in the ordinary course of business. The link for this article located at Network Computing is no longer available. . We give out personal information every day. Between our birth and death records, we dispense an aval. personal, information, every, between, birth, death, records, dispense. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Jun 18, 2001
•
Privacy
81
data protectionlegislationprivacy rightsLegislation Aims To Protect Employee Email and Internet Privacy Rights
A bill proposed earlier this summer that would prohibit companies from secretly monitoring their employees' e-mail messages and Internet usage could get key congressional subcommittee approval next week as lawmakers rush to finish up business before adjourning early next month. . . . . A bill proposed earlier this summer that would prohibit companies from secretly monitoring their employees' e-mail messages and Internet usage could get key congressional subcommittee approval next week as lawmakers rush to finish up business before adjourning early next month. The link for this article located at InfoWorld is no longer available. . A new legislative measure aims to prohibit corporations from covertly surveilling workers' email communications and online activities.. Employee Privacy Rights, Email Monitoring Law, Data Protection Legislation. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Sep 07, 2000
•
Privacy
Get the latest News and Insights
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.
Community Poll
What got you started with Linux?
Search Topics
Powered By
Linux Security - Your source for Top Linux News, Advisories, HOWTOs and Feature Releases
QUICK LINKS
subscribe to newsletters!
Like staying secure? So do we.
Sign up for updates, tips, and alerts!
Discover faster search, smarter navigation, and deeper Linux security insights. Read More