Employees are now regarded as a greater danger to workplace cyber security than the gangs of hackers and virus writers launching targeted attacks from outside the firewall. That is the perception of 75 per cent of Australian information technology managers who took part in an international IBM security survey. . With email and instant messaging proving increasingly popular and devices such as laptop computers, mobile phones and USB storage devices more commonplace in the office, the opportunities for workplace crime are growing. "People are becoming the weakest link. A fluid work force with diminished loyalty to organisations is being exacerbated by the fact that people do not always realise the value of information that they deal with," said Claudia Warwar, managing consultant at IBM BCS Security and Privacy Practice. The link for this article located at The Age AU is no longer available. . Investigating the escalating safety concerns arising from workforce members in contemporary office settings. Grasping viewpoints and hazards.. workplace Security, cyber threat Awareness, employee Risk Management, data Protection. . Brittany Day
I've discussed written security policies in the past--every business needs to have a set in place. If you don't have a written security policy, your employees remain the biggest security risk for your business. If you do have a security policy . . . . I've discussed written security policies in the past--every business needs to have a set in place. If you don't have a written security policy, your employees remain the biggest security risk for your business. If you do have a security policy in place, perhaps it's time to re-examine its wording. Case in point: Elite Web Hosting of Orlando, Florida. Elite ran a high-income business that hosted Web sites and had a security policy in place, but apparently the policy wasn't explicit enough, and eventually it cost Elite the entire business. A story last week in BusinessWeek revealed that a disgruntled former employee broke into Elite's network back in September and sent defamatory email that said the company was venturing into the porn industry. As a result, customers jumped ship by the dozen, which eventually caused Elite to fold. Elite took the perpetrator to court, but the company had trouble making the charges stick even though the ex-employee had clearly overstepped reasonable bounds. According to the story, the perpetrator didn't take any action disallowed by company policy. Furthermore, the policy didn't dictate exactly when an ex-employee's network access should be terminated. As a result, the defendant won the case. Former US Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutor Bill Cook commented in the BusinessWeek story that the first legal action a company should take against an ex-employee is to obtain a temporary retraining order barring access to company resources. That advice sounds extreme, but it comes from a federal prosecutor; I expect he knows what he's talking about. Look closely at your company security policy to see whether you've adequately covered the important items. And consider having an attorney experienced in these types of cases look overyour policy to ensure you can use it in a court of law, should that need ever arise. Until next time, have a great week. The link for this article located at ntsecurity.net is no longer available. . Tackling staff-related vulnerabilities within corporate security regulations is crucial for safeguarding your organization's resources and integrity.. Employee Threats, Business Security Policies, Network Access Control, Legal Compliance, Data Protection. . Anthony Pell
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.