Brute force attacks on cryptography could take billions of years, which no one has to spare. Maybe you live in a country where rubber hose cryptography is, shall we say, frowned upon. Hacking a target's endpoint is an option, but what if you get caught? Better to use an attack that leaves no forensic traces behind. . Enter side channel attacks. A side channel attack breaks cryptography by using information leaked by cryptography, such as monitoring the electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation emitted by a computer screen to view information before it's encrypted in a van Eck phreaking attack, aka Transient Electromagnetic Pulse Emanation STandard (TEMPEST). Other well-known side channel attacks include spying on the power consumption of an electronic device to steal an encryption key, or acoustic attacks that record the sound of a user's key strokes to steal their passphrase. . Enter side channel attacks. A side channel attack breaks cryptography by using information leaked by. brute, force, attacks, cryptography, billions, years, which, spare, maybe. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Vulnerabilities in implementations of the STARTTLS protocol for establishing an encrypted TLS connection could allow commands to be injected into a connection. According to a description by the discoverer of the problem, Postfix developer Wietse Venema, the key point is that commands are injected into the connection before it has been secured/encrypted, but are only executed once the secure connection has been established.. Venema illustrates the problem with an example involving securing SMTP with TLS. A client sends "STARTTLS\r\n"; using a man-in-the-middle attack an attacker changes this to "STARTTLS\r\nRSET\r\n". The client and server then establish a TLS connection. The server now regards the injected RSET command that was added during the unprotected phase as if it has been transferred subsequent to the TLS connection being established. The RSET command in this example is relatively innocuous as it is a harmless protocol reset command, but other commands could be injected in a similar fashion. The link for this article located at H Security is no longer available. . Postfix engineer Venema elaborates on the STARTTLS vulnerability opening doors for command injection prior to establishing TLS. Discover the potential consequences.. STARTTLS, Command Injection, SMTP Security, TLS Protocol, Encryption Risks. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
IT managers and security experts have expressed alarm at a new hacking tool for accessing supposedly secure wireless local area networks (WLANs), which is freely available on the Internet. The tool, called AirSnort, can recover encryption keys used to protect data . . . . IT managers and security experts have expressed alarm at a new hacking tool for accessing supposedly secure wireless local area networks (WLANs), which is freely available on the Internet. The tool, called AirSnort, can recover encryption keys used to protect data sent over wireless networks by exploiting flaws in the Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) security protocol, used to encrypt data carried on 802.11b WLANs. Earlier this year, IT Week Labs found that current WEP offerings were inadequate for securing data. The link for this article located at ZDNet is no longer available. . A recent cybersecurity software, SkySiphon, has caused concern among network administrators for taking advantage of weaknesses in Wi-Fi security.. Wireless LAN Threats,Hacking Tools,WEP Security Issues,Data Encryption Risks,AirSnort Vulnerability. . Anthony Pell
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.