Are you using full-disk encryption to protect your data? If so, you may want to reconsider after reading this article. . Like with any industry, the information security industry, more commonly referred to as “cybersecurity,” for all its raging debates, has rallied around a small corpus of best practices . One of the highest on this list is full-disk encryption, which security experts regard as sacrosanct, a no-brainer that everyone should use at the barest of minimums. This is the encryption that ensures that someone who snatches your device won’t be able to know everything you’ve got saved on it. I’m here to make the case that most of you are better off not using it. I know this might sound crazy, since I’m kind of the security guy here, but hear me out. . Full-disk encryption (FDE) is lauded for strong data security but carries drawbacks like system slowdowns, recovery challenges, and potential for a false sense of safety. Full-Disk Encryption, Data Protection, Cybersecurity Practices, Risks of Encryption, Security Discussions. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
What. People all over the world use Google services for sensitive or private communications every day. Google enables encrypted connections to these services in order to protect users from spying by those who control the network, such as ISPs and governments. Today, the security of this encryption relies entirely on certificates issued by certificate authorities (CAs), which continue to prove vulnerable to attack. When an attacker obtains a fraudulent certificate, he can use it to eavesdrop on the traffic between a user and a website even while the user believes that the connection is secure.. A Google-targeted man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack reveals vulnerabilities in the certificate authority (CA) system by intercepting user-server communications. Man-In-The-Middle Attack, Google Services Security, Certificate Authority Issues. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.