The NSA has lied to the Congress, the courts, and perhaps even to the president himself, but no one seems to care. The Director of National Intelligence James R Clapper admitted he lied to Congress about the NSA metadata collection program. He said the NSA had no such program . General Keith Alexander, director of the National Security Agency, lied in 2012 that the NSA does not hold data on US citizens, and repeated similar misstatements, under oath, to Congress about the program: The link for this article located at The Guardian is no longer available. . General Keith Alexander, director of the National Security Agency, lied in 2012 that the NSA does no. congress, courts, perhaps, president, himself. . Alex
It's a security practitioners dream to deploy a technology that ensures perfect data protection 100 percent of the time. Short of unplugging a computer and locking it in a vault, few technologies come as close as encryption to nearly unbreakable data security; take the data, run it through an encryption algorithm, and it's unreadable to anyone who doesn't possess the right key to reverse the process. It can be mathematically demonstrated that retrieval of encrypted data without the encryption keys is computationally impossible within the expected lifetime of the universe.. And while many strive for this level of certainty, practical issues in the use and deployment of encryption often limit benefits and negatively impact business operations. Reality has a very rude habit of shattering our security dreams. Encryption is everywhere in IT, from network communications and stored data, all the way down to smartphones and thumb drives. When applied correctly, it's incredibly effective at preserving data privacy and integrity. When misapplied, either because it was poorly deployed or is expected to solve a problem it cannot, an organization does not get added security, but instead spends unnecessary money and slows down operations. The link for this article located at Search Security is no longer available. . And while many strive for this level of certainty, practical issues in the use and deployment of enc. security, practitioners, dream, deploy, technology, ensures, perfect, protection. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Electronic signatures are backed by valid European laws and thus qualified digital signatures have great potential. Strong digital signatures have great importance to all businesses who must do electronic transactions with European partners because they have a very deep juridical value. Once again, a secure digital signature warrants the authentication, integrity, confidentiality, and non-repudiation of a signatory; these are the most desired guarantees in e-business. Strong digital signatures thus have widespread use for high value e-commerce situations: everyone wants to be sure her/his contract is valid and there is no hacker interference. . . .. People who do business on the Internet require security and trust. In electronic commerce and communication you can't see the person you are speaking with, you can't see the documents that prove one's identity, and you can't even know if the web site you are connected to belongs to the society it says. You must also ask yourself: is this indeed the contract my business partner has sent to me or has someone unauthorized seen and changed it before it reached my desk? What will happen if I have problems with the contract and I must take it to a court of law? To answer these juridical necessities the European Union adopted a community framework for electronic signatures some time ago (directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and the council of December 13, 1999, on a community framework for electronic signatures) that has been implemented in various European countries. The European directive is used for business in which European partners (persons or societies) or public administrations are involved. It also means that if an American organization enters into an electronic contract with a European society it has to respect European requirements to ensure the contract is valid. This paper will address these issues and then provide an overview of current trends within various countries in Europe. ... Electronic signatures are backed by valid European laws and thusqualified digital signatures have great potential. Strong digital signatures have great importance to all businesses who must do electronic transactions with European partners because they have a very deep juridical value. Once again, a secure digital signature warrants the authentication, integrity, confidentiality, and non-repudiation of a signatory; these are the most desired guarantees in e-business. Strong digital signatures thus have widespread use for high value e-commerce situations: everyone wants to be sure her/his contract is valid and there is no hacker interference. The PKI situation in Europe is still not consistent across all countries, however. Some countries, such as Italy, Austria, and Spain have well-developed infrastructure already in place; others such as Finland, Denmark, Germany, and France are still testing their PKI solutions. Further, some countries such as Holland and the United Kingdom have not even started deploying their public key infrastructure. The link for this article located at SecurityFocus is no longer available. . People who do business on the Internet require security and trust. In electronic commerce and commun. signatures, electronic, backed, valid, european, qualified, digital. . Anthony Pell
Encapsulating security payloads, key exchange mechanisms and other components of establishing secure data transfers. In Part 2, we move on to encapsulating security payloads and key exchange mechanisms. IPSec ESP format, specified in RFC 2406, provides confidentiality, authenticity and integrity.. . .. Encapsulating security payloads, key exchange mechanisms and other components of establishing secure data transfers. In Part 2, we move on to encapsulating security payloads and key exchange mechanisms. IPSec ESP format, specified in RFC 2406, provides confidentiality, authenticity and integrity. The original packet is transparently encrypted by the IPSec layer before being sent and decrypted on the receiving side. An eavesdropper capturing packets in any intermediate node will not be able to recover the original contents of the packet (or, at least, he should not be able to do it in a reasonable amount of time). The link for this article located at Linux Journal is no longer available. . IPSec is a suite of protocols that secures Internet Protocol communications using encryption and integrity checks, protecting data transmission effectively. IPSec, Data Transfer Security, Key Exchange Mechanisms, Payload Encryption. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.