It's believed that human error caused a glitch in the country's firewall, sending people to a company that sells anti-censorship technology to Chinese citizens.. China's formidable Great Firewall, which blocks access to all sorts of Web services and believed threats to the country's people, was the victim of a glitch on Wednesday that saw hundreds of millions of Chinese Web users attempting to access allowed sites being redirected to the homepage of Dynamic Internet Technology (DIT), a company that sells technology allowing Chinese citizens to get around the firewall. Although state-run media outlets have said that the glitch was in fact a successful hack, people familiar with the matter told Reuters on Wednesday that no hacking attempts were identified, making those sources wonder if simple human error caused the issue when modifications were made to the firewall. The link for this article located at CNET is no longer available. . A malfunction in China's Great Firewall has caused unexpected website redirects, igniting fears regarding government censorship and monitoring of internet activity in the nation.. Great Firewall, Anti-Censorship Tools, Internet Censorship, User Redirection. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
The "Great Firewall of China" is now able to detect and block encryption: A number of companies providing "virtual private network" (VPN) services to users in China say the new system is able to "learn, discover and block" the encrypted communications methods used by a number of different VPN systems. . China Unicom, one of the biggest telecoms providers in the country, is now killing connections where a VPN is detected, according to one company with a number of users in China. The link for this article located at Schneier on Security is no longer available. . The restrictive measures imposed by China have intensified, making it increasingly difficult for users who depend on virtual private networks (VPNs) to secure their online activities.. VPN Encryption, China Censorship, Internet Privacy Tools, Digital Security. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
The federal government's unprecedented practice of confiscating internet domain names in secret court proceedings took a new and ominous turn last week when it resulted in the closure of as many as 84,000 website addresses.. The power grab came last Friday, when the mooo.com, an address a service called Free DNS used to resolve more than user 84,000 websites was unceremoniously suspended at the registrar level. Sites that relied on mooo.com soon displayed a banner that said the domain name had been seized by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the main investigative arm of the US Department of Homeland Security. The banner went on to include this creepy nugget: The link for this article located at The Register UK is no longer available. . The power grab came last Friday, when the mooo.com, an address a service called Free DNS used to res. federal, government's, unprecedented, practice, confiscating, internet, domain, names, secret. . Alex
In response to the country. France The link for this article located at TorrentFreak is no longer available. . Internet Service Providers in France encountered significant obstacles in their efforts to curb file-sharing, proving largely ineffective despite government laws like HADOPI.. File Sharing, ISP Attack, Digital Rights, Internet Censorship, Piracy Measures. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
A recent policy conflict between Google and the Chinese government is stirring up a lot of dust and creating a lot of confusion. Google recently announced A new approach to China in the Official Google Blog. The 12 January 2010 announcement makes allegations of security cracking by agents of the Chinese government in an attempt to gain access to dissidents. Second, we have evidence to suggest that a primary goal of the attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists. The announcement also makes it clear that Google The link for this article located at Tech Republic is no longer available. . Incidents directed at Google highlight intensifying frictions with China, emphasizing concerns over human rights abuses and restrictions on free expression.. Google Incident, China Cybersecurity, Internet Censorship, Human Rights Activism. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
The Australian government is looking to expand its controversial web filtering platform, forcing internet service providers (ISPs) to install content filters to block out "refused content" from overseas. Material classified as "refused" includes anything depicting sexual abuse and child pornography, along with instructions for criminal activities and drug abuse. All items on the list are already illegal to distribute within the country.. The Australian government also plans to offer a grant programme intended to help ISPs integrate further filtering features at the service level which can then be offered as optional protections to users. The move is the latest in a filtering campaign that has become global news. Citizens and lawmakers have protested against the plans, which have been compared to the heavy-handed filtering practices used in China and Iran. Stephen Conroy, Australian minister for broadband, communications and digital economy, said that the government would welcome input from ISPs, and that the campaign is designed only to block illegal material and give parents a better option in protecting their children.. Australia plans to improve digital security by implementing broader web filters for internet service providers to efficiently restrict unlawful material.. Australia Web Filter,ISP Content Filtering,Online Safety,Internet Censorship,Digital Safety. . Alex
On October 4th one of our readers sent in a very worrying analysis of what appeared to be "traffic modification" (in his words) on the part of the Tor network. The Tor ("The Onion Router") network is an anonymizing peer-to-peer network of routers on the Internet which uses various techniques to bounce traffic around the Internet in such a way that traffic analysis becomes difficult if not impossible to perform. Tor is a perfect example of a dual-use technology: it can be used to avoid government-imposed Internet censorship or to protect the identity of a corporate whistleblower but at the same time it is sadly ideal for various nefarious uses. . The link for this article located at Sans.org is no longer available. . The Tor network offers online anonymity but has vulnerabilities such as reliance on volunteer relays, potential traffic monitoring, and user exposure risks that necessitate caution. Anonymity Network, Traffic Analysis, Privacy Technology, Tor Network Security. . Benjamin D. Thomas
Here is what a liberal MP had to say: "If a successor to David Blunkett was going to introduce tough censorship laws on the use of the Internet in the UK, should someone be able to justify a hacking attack against the IT involved because they opposed that censorship?" This is a dangerous trend, folks. . . .. With Britain's Computer Misuse Act heading for a revision, some MPs want to explore whether ethical hacking should be allowed Should UK citizens ever should have the right to launch a hack attack against a computer or a network? A group of tech-savvy MPs are poised to consider this question, as the All-Party Internet Group (APIG) launches an investigation into Britain's cybercrime laws. APIG has recognised that the Computer Misuse Act (CMA), which came into law in 1990, needs to be updated to cover attacks upon the Internet and on other computer networks. Like many experts, the group is concerned that the existing legislation may not apply to denial-of-service attacks -- where a network is driven offline by a flood of Web traffic. "As it stands, the Computer Misuse Act suffers from a lack of a network focus. Today, the primary threat from hackers is to the network, rather than to individual computers, and if the network goes down we've got problems," said Richard Allan MP, joint vice-chairman of APIG. APIG has already received written evidence from interested parties, and is taking further oral evidence at a session in parliament on Thursday. The Home Office has said it is revising the CMA at present, and APIG wants to feed the views of the UK IT industry into this process. And while Allan is adamant that tough action is needed against denial of service attacks, he's also keen to examine whether ethical hacking should be protected in law. He cited the law on criminal damage, where a defendant can claim that they acted to avoid a worse event taking place. "If a successor to David Blunkett was going to introduce tough censorship laws on the use of the Internet in the UK, should someone be able to justify ahacking attack against the IT involved because they opposed that censorship," asked Allan, who is the liberal democrat MP for Sheffield Hallam. The link for this article located at zdnet.co.uk is no longer available. . As the evaluation of the UK's Computer Misuse Act progresses, lawmakers examine the framework surrounding ethical hacking in light of increasing cyber risks.. ethical hacking, cybercrime legislation, network security, UK policy. . Anthony Pell
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.