Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 449
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 449

Stay Ahead With Linux Security News

Filter%20icon Refine news
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":16.67,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":33.33,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security news

We found -3 articles for you...
81

Exploring Email Marketing Versus Spam With Scott Richter

For lunch, Scott Richter ordered ham--a meat of uncomplicated origins, as opposed to Hormel's mysterious jumble. His choice seems somehow appropriate for a person who says he's a legitimate bulk E-mail marketer, rather than a spammer. It's understandable that he . . . . For lunch, Scott Richter ordered ham--a meat of uncomplicated origins, as opposed to Hormel's mysterious jumble. His choice seems somehow appropriate for a person who says he's a legitimate bulk E-mail marketer, rather than a spammer. It's understandable that he wants to make such a distinction. With unwanted E-mail accounting for anywhere from 25% to 60% of all messages, the court of public opinion has already passed judgment on mass E-mailers. "We get people who send us a lot of postal junk mail, send us dirty letters, call us up and cuss us out," Richter says. "And a lot of people who do those things to us aren't even people who've had mail from us. Every time somebody writes a story on us, I'll get these E-mails, 'Don't ever spam me, you dirty bleep bleep,' ... and they're not even on our list." A California E-mail marketer of printer supplies, who asked not to be identified, tells of having to take the company's 800-number fax out of his messages because of the protest response. "When we had the fax number in there, they would tie up the fax for three or four days at a time," he says. The link for this article located at SecurityPipeline is no longer available. . For lunch, Scott Richter ordered ham--a meat of uncomplicated origins, as opposed to Hormel's myster. lunch, scott, richter, ordered, ham--a, uncomplicated, origins, opposed, hormel's, myster. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Nov 18, 2003 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Privacy
81

Exploring the Allegations Surrounding Scott Richter's Email Marketing

I don't know what to make of Scott Richter's claims that he is not a spammer, but rather a legitimate e-mail marketer. Three things are true about spam: (1) There are many spammers. (2) There are many legitimate e-mail marketers. (3) . . . . I don't know what to make of Scott Richter's claims that he is not a spammer, but rather a legitimate e-mail marketer. Three things are true about spam: (1) There are many spammers. (2) There are many legitimate e-mail marketers. (3) All of the spammers claim to be legitimate e-mail marketers. Scott Richter is one of the subjects in our recent feature story on spam, ehich looks at who's sending spam and why it's hard to stop them. The link for this article located at SecurityPipeline is no longer available. . I don't know what to make of Scott Richter's claims that he is not a spammer, but rather a legitimat. don't, scott, richter's, claims, spammer, rather, legitimat. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Nov 13, 2003 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Privacy
News Add Esm H340

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":16.67,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":33.33,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200