The National Institute of Standards and Technology has released the initial public draft of its Special Publication 800-80 titled Guide for Developing Performance Metrics for Information Security. NIST is inviting public comment on the guidance, which provides a methodology for linking information security program performance to agency performance. It is a companion guide to SP 800-55, titled Security Metrics for Information Technology Systems, and uses security controls spelled out in a third NIST publication, SP 800-53 Recommended Security Controls for Federal Information Systems. . The publications are intended to help agencies comply with government mandates, including the Federal Information Security management Act and the President’s Management Agenda. They offer templates and candidate metrics to facilitate implementation for each of the 17 control families identified in SP 800-53. The goal is for agencies to provide the appropriate level of protection for IT systems, recognizing that information security has become an essential business function for agencies. “The guide describes the information security performance metrics development process as a means for tying information security controls implementation, efficiency and effectiveness to an agency’s success in its mission-critical activities, The link for this article located at Government Computer News is no longer available. . NIST's proposed framework supports organizations in creating robust security measures to align with federal IT regulations.. NIST Security Guidance, IT Security Metrics, Performance Metrics for Security, Federal Compliance. . Brittany Day
James Bond technologies like face recognition, fingerprint sensors, hand geometry, and other biometric security systems may be impossible to accurately evaluate, unless researchers also measure the performance of the testers and the demographics of the subjects, a key researcher said Wednesday. . . . . James Bond technologies like face recognition, fingerprint sensors, hand geometry, and other biometric security systems may be impossible to accurately evaluate, unless researchers also measure the performance of the testers and the demographics of the subjects, a key researcher said Wednesday. "Vulnerability tests have been around for a decade, the problem is developing test protocols to test for vulnerabilities," says Dr. Jim Wayman, director of the biometric test center at San Jose State University, speaking at the 11th annual USENIX Security Symposium. "Going from technical results to what happens in a real world system, you have to go through a mathematical modeling system. Wayman is developing test protocols for evaluation of biometrics device performance, which are slated to post as an annex to the ISO 15408 Common Criteria. He notes that while testing protocols are still in their infancy, millions of dollars are already being poured into biometric systems. The link for this article located at SecurityFocus is no longer available. . Assessing the difficulties in measuring the efficacy and reliability of biometric technologies, such as facial recognition and fingerprint identification systems.. Biometric Evaluation, Testing Procedures, Performance Metrics, Security Technologies. . Anthony Pell
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.