Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 499
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 499

Stay Ahead With Linux Security News

Filter%20icon Refine news
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":40,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security news

We found 0 articles for you...
81

Exploring Privacy Discussions: Search Engines And Government Control

At the center of the square off over the access to private personal data online -- a much publicized debate that extends from Beijing to Washington -- stands an uncertain arbiter: the search engine. The companies that operate the most popular search engines -- Google, Yahoo and Microsoft -- are making decisions about how the information they collect about user behavior should be protected, in some cases from the eyes of governments that want to take a closer look but lack a clear legal right to do so. . "Search engines are the future of [that] debate," says Timothy Wu, a Columbia Law School professor specializing in telecommunications law, copyright, and international trade. "Questions about policy ultimately are going to be handled by search engines -- whether we live in a more or less government-controlled country." The link for this article located at Security Pipeline is no longer available. . As tech giants increasingly shape our lives, the urgency for privacy in search engines rises. Timothy Wu calls for strong data protection frameworks against overreach.. search engine policy, data safety, privacy management. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Mar 01, 2006 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Privacy
81

David Brin's Perspectives On Security And Privacy Issues

David Brin is a privacy heretic. He doesn't agree with those in the intelligence and law-enforcement communities who argue that Americans have to surrender freedoms to make their lives safe. Nor does he agree with advocates who argue that it makes sense to protect privacy at all costs -- certainly not if it means living with added insecurity. . . .. David Brin is a privacy heretic. He doesn't agree with those in the intelligence and law-enforcement communities who argue that Americans have to surrender freedoms to make their lives safe. Nor does he agree with advocates who argue that it makes sense to protect privacy at all costs -- certainly not if it means living with added insecurity. As Brin sees it, security and privacy shouldn't be construed as rivals: Instead, he says, everyone will be safer if the government knows a lot -- within reason -- about its citizens, and if Americans know a lot more than they do now about how the government uses their information. Brin may be provocative, but he's not crazy. A PhD in space physics and sci-fi author, Brin argues that security is advanced by openness rather than secrecy. Many of his views are laid out in his 1998 book about privacy The Transparent Society. The march of increasingly intrusive technology is unstoppable, he reasons, so why fight it? The link for this article located at Business Week is no longer available. . David Brin, a renowned sci-fi author, emphasizes the vital balance of privacy and security, advocating transparency for a more just society without sacrificing freedoms. David Brin, Privacy Perspectives, Security Awareness, Government Oversight, Digital Privacy. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Jun 05, 2002 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Privacy
81

State Proposal for Biometric Driver's Licenses Raises Privacy Concerns

State motor-vehicle offices will propose that drivers' licenses incorporate biometrics. Is that the same as a national ID card? Calls for creating a national ID card system, which advocates say would make it harder for terrorists to move undetected within U.S. . . . . State motor-vehicle offices will propose that drivers' licenses incorporate biometrics. Is that the same as a national ID card? Calls for creating a national ID card system, which advocates say would make it harder for terrorists to move undetected within U.S. borders, have drawn criticism for their totalitarian overtones. Now, a group representing state motor-vehicle departments is about to unveil a proposal that could turn the average driver's license into a technology-laden ID. Yet privacy concerns remain, and the IT challenges may be even greater. The link for this article located at InfoWeek is no longer available. . State vehicle licensing agencies advocate for biometric data use in driver's license issuance, sparking debates on privacy rights versus security enhancements. Biometric License, National ID System, Privacy Issues, Security Measures, Public Safety Policy. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Jan 14, 2002 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Privacy
81

Bush's Proposal on Internet Surveillance Sparks Privacy Concerns

President Bush's proposal to permit Internet surveillance without a court order drew sharp questions from senators on Tuesday. Members of the Senate Judiciary committee appeared divided over whether the Mobilization Against Terrorism Act (MATA), which the Justice Department sent to Congress . . . . President Bush's proposal to permit Internet surveillance without a court order drew sharp questions from senators on Tuesday. Members of the Senate Judiciary committee appeared divided over whether the Mobilization Against Terrorism Act (MATA), which the Justice Department sent to Congress this week, was a vital anti-terrorism measure or an infringement of privacy. It wasn't a partisan split: Left-leaning Dianne Feinstein of California and conservative icon Chuck Grassley of Iowa both wondered during Tuesday's hearing whether the administration's bill could be reworked -- just a bit -- to resolve some of their worries. The link for this article located at Wired News is no longer available. . President Bush's proposal to permit Internet surveillance without a court order drew sharp questions. president, bush's, proposal, permit, internet, surveillance, without, court, order, sharp. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Sep 26, 2001 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Privacy
81

Exploring Internet Privacy Challenges Raised at Aspen Summit

Maybe John Palafoutas said it best. "People are not concerned about privacy, they're hysterical about privacy," the head of the American Electronics Association said during a spirited debate at the Aspen Summit Monday night. The debate will rage on in . . . . Maybe John Palafoutas said it best. "People are not concerned about privacy, they're hysterical about privacy," the head of the American Electronics Association said during a spirited debate at the Aspen Summit Monday night. The debate will rage on in the private sector, among consumers and in government circles before the issue is concisely defined, let alone settled. Even the language in the largely-uncharted waters of online privacy is vague. Not just consumers, but business and government are still pretty much in the dark about Internet privacy, including what it really is, summiteers say. The link for this article located at ComputerUser is no longer available. . Maybe John Palafoutas said it best. 'People are not concerned about privacy, they're hysterical abou. maybe, palafoutas, 'people, concerned, about, privacy, they're, hysterical. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Aug 23, 2000 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Privacy
News Add Esm H340

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":3,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":2,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":40,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200