Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×
In an era where concerns about online privacy are at an all-time high, many individuals are seeking ways to reclaim control over their personal data. As a response, some have turned to alternative operating systems like Linux and smartphones that have been “degoogled” – stripped of Google’s proprietary services. . While these choices may seem like logical steps toward enhancing privacy, it’s crucial to recognize that they do not provide an absolute shield against data collection and surveillance. In this article, we’ll explore the limitations of relying solely on Linux and degoogled phones to protect your privacy, so you don’t fall into an illusion of privacy. While using Linux as your operating system and a degoogled phone can reduce your dependence on tech giants like Microsoft and Google, it does not entirely sever your ties to them. Many Linux distributions still rely on components from these tech giants, such as drivers and firmware for hardware. Additionally, alternative app stores and services available on degoogled phones may have their own privacy concerns or dependencies on other tech companies. . Opting for Linux and privacy-focused smartphones can bolster security, yet they are not entirely immune to data gathering and monitoring.. Linux Privacy Techniques, Data Collection Risks, Alternative OS Benefits. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Security companies are updating their technology to recognize people wearing masks and measure temperatures, and are making the argument that facial recognition could become widely sought as a global security solution. However, this technology still has serious privacy-threatening implications that need to be considered. . With fears of spreading the coronavirus at the forefront of everyone’s minds, security companies are arguing that facial recognition systems may be a safer, cleaner option than traditional biometric access control systems. The claim is not coming without controversy, as fingerprint scanners have become increasingly common as access control solutions at facilities around the world. But as organizations like the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and New York Police Department shut down their typical employee fingerprint scanning protocols due to the pandemic, facial recognition could become a more attractive option to businesses. The link for this article located at Security Today is no longer available. . The pandemic has hastened the use of facial recognition technology, enhancing security while igniting privacy debates over its role in monitoring and health tracking.. Facial Recognition, Biometric Systems, COVID-19 Security, Privacy Implications, Access Control. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
In anextraordinary essay, the former FBI general counsel Jim Baker makes the case for strong encryption over government-mandated backdoors. What is your opinion on this? Learn more in a great Schneier on Security article: . Basically, he argues that the security value of strong encryption greatly outweighs the security value of encryption that can be bypassed. He endorses a "defense dominant" strategy for Internet security. Keep in mind that Baker led the FBI's legal case against Apple regarding the San Bernardino shooter's encrypted iPhone. In writing this piece, Baker joins the growing list of former law enforcement and national security senior officials who have come out in favor of strong encryption over backdoors: Michael Hayden , Michael Chertoff , Richard Clarke, Ash Carter ,William Lynn, and Mike McConnell. The link for this article located at Schneier on Security is no longer available. . Smith contends that robust encryption is crucial for safeguarding privacy, surpassing the demands for vulnerabilities. Discover additional insights into his perspective.. Strong Encryption, Internet Security, Privacy Risks, Cybersecurity, Data Protection. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
A controversial draft law, which one senator called a "surveillance bill by another name," has passed the Senate. CISA, the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (S. 754), will allow private companies to share cyber-threat data with the federal government, including personal user data, in an effort to prevent cyberattacks, such as those on the scale of Target, Home Depot, and Sony. . Companies that share data with federal agencies, including the National Security Agency (NSA), will be given legal and liability protections from lawsuits relating to data sharing. . Companies that share data with federal agencies, including the National Security Agency (NSA), will . controversial, draft, which, senator, called, 'surveillance, another, passe. . Alex
While Steve Wozniak's main concern is with cloud user agreements, there are security issues as well. Wired reporter Mat Honan reported that his iCloud account had been hacked on Friday, and that the intruder had remotely wiped the shared content on all of his devices -- including MacBook Air, iPhone and iPad.. Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak has expressed his doubts about the wisdom of storing so much in the cloud Relevant Products/Services. The comments were made in a question-and-answer session Saturday, following the Wash., D.C., solo performance Relevant Products/Services of The Agony and Ecstasy of Steve Jobs, which Wozniak attended. The link for this article located at Top Tech News is no longer available. . Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak has expressed his doubts about the wisdom of storing so much in the c. while, steve, wozniak's, concern, cloud, agreements, there, security. . Anthony Pell
HACKERS have stolen customer data from the internet company AAPT to highlight the dangers of a proposal to force telcos to store every Australian's web history for up to two years. . The chief executive of the internet service provider, David Yuile, confirmed the security breach, which occurred at 9.30pm Wednesday, in a statement to the Herald yesterday, saying he was 'extremely concerned'. AAPT is conducting an investigation and has promised to contact any affected customers. The link for this article located at The Age is no longer available. . Cybercriminals breach AAPT, compromising client information to expose dangers of online activity tracking.. Data Breach, Customer Privacy, Retention Proposal, Internet Security. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
The eyes of the online world are on Joe Sullivan. As the CSO of Facebook, Sullivan is without a doubt one of the most visible security chiefs in the business. He must mitigate myriad security and privacy risks not only for Facebook's employees and corporate systems, but also for the social network's 800 million members.. Sullivan, 44, joined Facebook in 2008. He moved to the private sector 10 years ago to focus on security, and before that he was a federal prosecutor for eight years. His legal background has come in handy of late, as Facebook has sued several people for misusing the service. CSO contributor Lauren Gibbons Paul talked to Sullivan about the challenges of managing security on a rapidly evolving social network. The link for this article located at CSO Online is no longer available. . Delve into Joe Sullivan's perspectives on tackling security issues at Facebook, all while protecting user privacy and ensuring data integrity.. Joe Sullivan, Facebook Safety, Cybersecurity Management, Privacy Risks. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
OK. This column may make me sound like I'm about to make a hat out of tinfoil but bear with me because my paranoia is completely justified. I know the truth and it's not "out there" as in "The X-Files," it's right here and it's a harsh reality that people really don't want to admit to: The reality is that there is no real privacy any more.. The fact is that today, should you become "of interest" to any person or group with serious power, whether that power is economic, political or criminal, you can kiss your privacy goodbye. And even without the Masters of the Universe on your case, there aren't really any organizations you can trust with your privacy. For example, remember in 2009 when I wrote about how Sprint had allowed various three-letter government agencies to track the location of cellphone users some 8 million times without a warrant being requested? Sprint actually made it easy for the agencies by creating a self-service portal! What happened when this was revealed? Nothing! No one in power cared that due process was being ignored! The link for this article located at Network World is no longer available. . The fact is that today, should you become 'of interest' to any person or group with serious power, w. column, sound, about, tinfoil, becau. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.