Bruce Schneier, a vocal critic of security measures used by the Transportation Security Administration, was asked to testify before Congress about TSA's security screening initiatives but then was "formally uninvited" after the agency complained. . "On Friday, at the request of the TSA, I was removed from the witness list," Schneier wrote on his blog. "The excuse was that I am involved in a lawsuit against the TSA, trying to get them to suspend their full-body scanner program. But it's pretty clear that the TSA is afraid of public testimony on the topic, and especially of being challenged in front of Congress. They want to control the story, and it's easier for them to do that if I'm not sitting next to them pointing out all the holes in their position. Unfortunately, the committee went along with them." The link for this article located at CNET is no longer available. . In a surprising twist, the TSA has retracted its invitation to Bruce Schneier for an impending congressional hearing about airport security, igniting public discourse.. Bruce Schneier, TSA Measures, Security Oversight, Public Scrutiny. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
One of the Pirate Bay. "Too many people have ties to our opponents and have been proven to be on the payroll or promised to become employed in the future," wrote Sunde. "We want everything to be in the eye of the public so that we can get help to see that everything is correct." The link for this article located at The Register is no longer available. . Founder of Torrent Cove voices worries about law enforcement credibility and calls for openness in inquiries.. Digital Rights, Pirate Bay, Police Integrity. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Indeed, many vendors, network administrators and security companies adopt a policy of less-is-more when it comes to the question of how much information to release to the public about a particular software bug, exploit or attack. . . .. Indeed, many vendors, network administrators and security companies adopt a policy of less-is-more when it comes to the question of how much information to release to the public about a particular software bug, exploit or attack. The reasoning goes something like this: If they release too many details, not only will they give hackers more ammunition for their attacks, but also -- and more importantly for the vendor whose software or standard was breached -- they'll open themselves up to public scrutiny and criticism. Microsoft Corp., for example, is notoriously tight-lipped about security flaws in its products, but usually takes a beating in the press nonetheless any time a bug is found. The link for this article located at ZDNet / eWeek is no longer available. . Many companies and cybersecurity experts adopt a minimalist strategy when revealing system vulnerabilities to mitigate public criticism.. Software Security Disclosure, Vendor Policies, Public Disclosure. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.