Tech giants and federal agencies meet at the White House to discuss open-source software security, a response to the widespread Log4j vulnerability that’s worrying industry and cyber leaders. . Among the attendees are companies like Apple, Facebook and Google, as well as the Apache Software Foundation, which builds Log4j , a ubiquitous open-source logging framework for websites. “Building on the Log4j incident, the objective of this meeting is to facilitate an important discussion to improve the security of open source software — and to brainstorm how new collaboration could rapidly drive improvements,” a senior administration official said in advance of the meeting. . Top executives convene at the Pentagon to tackle the urgent privacy risks triggered by the new software vulnerabilities.. Open Source Security, Log4j Vulnerability, Tech Summit, Software Collaboration, Cybersecurity Initiatives. . Brittany Day
A panel discussion involving a group of experts held during DEMO ‘06 in Phoenix last week concluded that the state of security today is not where it should be. But the panelists also had suggestions on how to improve it. During the conference, which is owned by Network World, former IBMer and consultant John Patrick called together a panel of industry and academic figures to try to answer the question, “Will the good guys be able to stay ahead of the bad guys?. The link for this article located at NetworkWorld is no longer available. . The webpage found on TechInsights is presently unreachable and is no longer accessible.. Cybersecurity Future, Expert Insights, Best Practices Discussion. . Benjamin D. Thomas
Emily Ratliff posted a summary of the recent USENIX "Birds of a Feather" (BOF) discussion about the Linux Security Module effort. This effort is trying to devise a set of Linux kernel hooks to support "plugging in" to Linux support for advanced security policies.. . .. Emily Ratliff posted a summary of the recent USENIX "Birds of a Feather" (BOF) discussion about the Linux Security Module effort. This effort is trying to devise a set of Linux kernel hooks to support "plugging in" to Linux support for advanced security policies. In particular, discussion has ranged over whether or not the "hooks" being inserted should be restrictive (only limit further what can be done) or permissive (can add NEW permissions). Permissive approaches are more flexible, but far more difficult to get right. It looks like the current approach is to only support restrictive approaches, and add permissive approaches later; if permissive approaches are added, they'll be separate (so that those who only need restrictive approaches don't have to deal with the additional complexity of permissive approaches). The link for this article located at USENIX is no longer available. . The USENIX BOF summary detailed a conversation on implementing kernel hooks in Linux to enhance security policies, addressing evolving threats and system performance. Linux Hooks, Kernel Security, Advanced Security Policies. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.