The Open Source Software Security Foundation (OpenSSF), a project of the Linux Foundation, has come up with a 10-point plan to improve the safety of the software supply chain, costed at $147.9M over two years, though it relies in part on developers changing their behaviour to take more account of security issues. . According to the OpenSSF “roughly 70-90% of any software stack consists of open source software.” Whether or not an application itself is open source, it is likely to include libraries and dependencies that are, developed using open source programming languages and compilers, and deployed on open source platforms. “The shared benefit also comes with shared risk in the form of exposure to vulnerabilities in those OSS components,” observes the new paper. . Approximately 60-80% of technology layers are composed of open source elements, highlighting common vulnerabilities and security issues in software engineering.. OpenSSF, Software Security, Linux Foundation, Open Source Safety, Security Planning. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Agency officials struggling to include information-security outlays in their budget requests may find help in a publication released today by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The draft document, NIST Special Publication 800-65, presents seven steps to ensure that information technology budget requests meet the requirements of the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002. . . .. Agency officials struggling to include information-security outlays in their budget requests may find help in a publication released today by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The draft document, NIST Special Publication 800-65, presents seven steps to ensure that information technology budget requests meet the requirements of the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002. Under FISMA, federal agencies must make information security planning part of their capital budgeting process for the first time. NIST technical experts wrote the new document to help agencies identify high-priority security needs that should get priority funds. NIST officials will accept comments on the document though Aug. 12 at
This August 2001 article answers the questions, "What would you do if you were given ten days to secure your network?" You're a new LAN administrator and you been given the charge of "securing" the network. What would be the most . . . . This August 2001 article answers the questions, "What would you do if you were given ten days to secure your network?" You're a new LAN administrator and you been given the charge of "securing" the network. What would be the most effective plan of action in the shortest period of time? What could you do to make your network more secure quickly? This paper will present ten days of effective tasks, with a quick task and long term task each day. Each essential security action listed below in the day-by-day tables has three characteristics: Focuses on real threats rather than theoretical threats Can be implemented quickly and inexpensively Are proven and effective The link for this article located at SANS is no longer available. . This May 2013 report provides insights into enhancing cybersecurity in two weeks through effective strategies.. Network Security, LAN Administration, Security Planning. . Anthony Pell
There are plenty of options for user authentication, but none is a "one-size-fits-all" solution. With so many available technologies, how do you select the right one for your organization's needs? "Systems architects sometimes get stuck on security planning, because it's hard . . . . There are plenty of options for user authentication, but none is a "one-size-fits-all" solution. With so many available technologies, how do you select the right one for your organization's needs? "Systems architects sometimes get stuck on security planning, because it's hard to choose among all the competing products and technologies. And nothing is tougher than finding a reliable means to identify and authenticate the user population. Reliable authentication is essential, of course, because so many security mechanisms base their accept/reject decisions on user identity. But there's no overall consensus about methods-that is, about the best way to authenticate someone in a given setting. Some security "experts" will tout a particular technology (biometrics, for instance, or PKI) as a one-size-fits-all solution. Others may rely on whatever off-the-shelf technology lies immediately at hand. The problem is that selecting a specific technology before you implement the general structure or "design pattern" of the solution is like putting the cart in front of the horse." . Investigate different methodologies for user identity verification, and discover customized approaches to strengthen your cybersecurity framework.. User Authentication, Trust Frameworks, Security Planning. . Anthony Pell
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.