Another month, another few dozen patches to install -- it's never-ending. It's frustrating. Software coding tools supposedly have security built in by default. We have "safe" programming languages. We have programmers using SDL (security development lifecycle) coding tools and techniques.. We have operating systems with more secure defaults and vendors that fuzz and attack their own software with a vengeance to find holes. We have companies spending billions of dollars to eliminate software bugs. The link for this article located at InfoWorld is no longer available. . We have operating systems with more secure defaults and vendors that fuzz and attack their own softw. another, month, dozen, patches, install, never-ending, frustrating, software. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Companies allow US intelligence to exploit vulnerabilities before it patches them: Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), the world's largest software company, provides intelligence agencies with information about bugs in its popular software before it publicly releases a fix, according to two people familiar with the process. . That information can be used to protect government computers and to access the computers of terrorists or military foes. Redmond, Washington-based Microsoft (MSFT) and other software or Internet security companies have been aware that this type of early alert allowed the U.S. to exploit vulnerabilities in software sold to foreign governments, according to two U.S. officials. Microsoft doesn't ask and can't be told how the government uses such tip-offs, said the officials, who asked not to be identified because the matter is confidential. The link for this article located at Schneier on Security is no longer available. . American intelligence agencies capitalize on software flaws prior to public remedies being released, affecting security protocols.. Vulnerability Exploitation, Offensive Security, Government Intelligence. . Alex
"To some, our observations can be summarized succinctly as "bugs happen". That certainly is not news. But dismissing our results so cavalierly misses. . .. "To some, our observations can be summarized succinctly as "bugs happen". That certainly is not news. But dismissing our results so cavalierly misses the point. Yes, bugs happen. But bugs can be fixed -if they are detected. The Internet is, as a whole, working remarkably well. Huge software packages (i.e., X11R5) can be distributed electronically. Connections span the globe. But the very success of the Internet makes some bugs invisible." - Steven Bellovin [1] This excerpt, from the well-known 1993 report Packets Found on an Internet, was written nearly nine years ago. As we all know, times have changed. Today, such "bugs", are likely part of an attempt to breach network security. The investigation of strange packets, the cited paper's topic, is now quite common. We know it as intrusion detection. In the past few years, intrusion detection systems have joined firewalls as the fundamental technologies driving network security. In the near future, a third component will emerge - anomaly detection. The link for this article located at Security Focus is no longer available. . Grasping the progression of anomaly identification in cybersecurity and its approach to tackling application flaws and breaches.. Anomaly Detection, Network Security Solutions, Intrusion Detection Systems. . Anthony Pell
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.