Whitebox testing is notoriously difficult to do. Without automatic code scanning tools, scanning the source code requires a keen eye, concentration and an enormous amount of time to scan each line for security vulnerabilities. As intruders become more sophisticated at finding security vulnerabilities and writing exploitative code, it becomes more necessary to take every precaution before shipping software.These precautions can range from security training throughout the security development lifecycle (SDLC) to using tools such as source code scanners and vulnerability scanners. . Last year, more vulnerabilities were reported in shipping software than any previous year, according to CERT. Nearly 6000 new vulnerabilities surfaced in shipped software, and the state of the industry seems grim. Despite attempts by the larger and more proactive players in the industry, like Microsoft, IBM, HP and CISCO, to incorporate security in all phases of the SDLC, the number of reported vulnerabilities continues to increase. Where are the greatest weaknesses in software security? Were nearly 2000 more vulnerabilities discovered because security trainers did not transfer their knowledge properly? Or are hackers getting better at discovering these vulnerabilities? Do software corporations rely too much on perimeter defenses, such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, deep packet inspectors and anti virus solutions? Is it just sheer complacency? Or is it really a combination of all of these things and more? The link for this article located at Dr. Dobbs Journal is no longer available. . The previous year witnessed an unprecedented volume of security flaws in released software applications. Delve into the methodologies and instruments associated with white-box testing.. Whitebox Tools, Code Scanning, Software Security, Vulnerability Assessment. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
David Wheeler, author of the Secure Programming HOWTO and the RATS development team from Secure Software Solutions today announced open source source code security flaw scanners. " RATS scans through code, finding potentially dangerous function calls. . . . . David Wheeler, author of the Secure Programming HOWTO and the RATS development team from Secure Software Solutions today announced open source source code security flaw scanners. " RATS scans through code, finding potentially dangerous function calls. The goal of this tool is not to definitively find bugs. Instead, this tool aims to provide a reasonable starting point for performing manual security audits." "Flawfinder" states it will "scan source code and identify out potential security flaws, ranking them by likely severity." Both teams mentioned they will be joining forces to produce a single GPLd 'best of breed' source code scanner. Currently only capable of scanning C/C++ code, "Flawfinder will miss some security problems, and point out issues that aren't really security problems, but nevertheless I think it can help track down security problems in code so that the code can be fixed." "Flawfinder is in its very early stages - I'm labelling it version "0.12". It works reliably, but its ruleset is currently small and rudimentary. It can already find some security problems now, but expanding its ruleset will give it much more power." Rough Auditing Tool for Security, the code analysis effort by SSS, looks also to be promising. "The initial vulnerability database is taken directly from things that could be easily found when starting with the forthcoming book, "Building Secure Software" by Viega and McGraw. We plan on actively maintaining RATS. We welcome any feedback, bug reports or contributions. Particularly, we would like to incorporate any vulnerability information people contribute. However, we will need to determine that information is public knowledge before we can incorporate it into the release. Feedback will be useful as we workon new versions of the tool. In the future, we plan on enhancing the tool with better analysis Additionally, we plan on extending the tool to handle other programming languages. We'd appreciate feedback on which languages are most important to people. The developers can be reached at:
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.