Network Security
system security Linux network
system security Linux network The romanticized image of the digital nomad – a laptop on a sun-drenched balcony – rarely accounts for the actual friction of maintaining a professional development environment on the move. . The friction is amplified with Linux. We are looking for a setup that respects our kernel configurations, handles volatile network handovers, and maintains a strict security posture without the hand-holding of a consumer-grade OS – so, put simply, more than just a laptop and a sunny deck. The hardware is...
May 26, 2026
Server Securityopen-source Linux administration
open-source Linux administration Cron has existed in Unix and Linux environments for decades, handling backups, cleanup scripts, patching jobs, log rotation, monitoring tasks, and other maintenance work that administrators do not want to run manually. Most Linux servers rely on it constantly, which is exactly why attackers continue abusing it for persistence after a system has already been compromised. . Persistence through cron is not complicated. Attackers do not need a rootkit or advanced malware framework to maintain...
May 25, 2026
Vendors/Productssecurity breach linux
security breach linux A major internal repository breach at GitHub has exposed a critical and overlooked blind spot in Linux supply chain security. Kernel exploits, exposed SSH services, weak firewall rules, and vulnerable daemons dominated the Linux threat model for years, and in many environments, they still matter. But recent supply-chain incidents involving GitHub ecosystems, npm packages, and malicious developer tooling point somewhere else entirely: the developer workstation. . The breach matters because...
May 21, 2026
Security Trends access control multi-tenant
access control multi-tenant Linux administrators often face an ugly choice in the cloud: prioritize convenience and cost-efficiency by sharing infrastructure, or sacrifice those benefits for the sake of total isolation. Most modern Linux workloads don't live on their own private servers anymore. They live in shared environments like Kubernetes clusters, where multiple teams and services run side-by-side. It sounds efficient, and it usually is. . But cloud isolation isn't as ironclad as it looks on the diagram. If you...
May 21, 2026
Vendors/Productsincident response cloud security
incident response cloud security Managed Extended Detection and Response (MXDR) has become one of the most sought-after security services in the enterprise market — and with good reason. It promises the holy grail: broad visibility across endpoints, network, cloud, email, and identity, combined with the 24/7 human expertise most organizations simply cannot build in-house. . However, the rapid growth of the market has produced a wide range of providers whose capabilities vary considerably beneath the surface. Choosing the...
May 19, 2026
Refine news
X Clear Filters
Get the latest News and Insights
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.
Community Poll
What got you started with Linux?
Loading...
Explore Latest Linux Security news
We found 4 articles for you...
82
consumer protectioninternet regulationsemail complianceNew CAN-SPAM Act Rules Effective January 1 for Email Marketers
Known as the CAN-SPAM Act, the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 takes effect Jan. 1. The law prohibits the use of false header information in bulk commercial e-mail and requires unsolicited messages to include opt-out . . . . Known as the CAN-SPAM Act, the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 takes effect Jan. 1. The law prohibits the use of false header information in bulk commercial e-mail and requires unsolicited messages to include opt-out instructions. Penalties for violations include fines of up to US$250 per e-mail, capped at up to $6 million. The bill's authors, Montana Republican Senator Conrad Burns and Oregon Democrat Senator Ron Wyden, praised the legislation as a powerful tool for countering the spam onslaught cluttering inboxes. "Swift and aggressive enforcement will be essential, and Senator Burns and I will continue to push the Federal Trade Commission and others to use the tools this law gives them to fight against spam," Wyden said in a written statement. Several major ISPs (Internet service providers) and e-commerce companies lined up to endorse the legislation. America Online Inc. hailed the CAN-SPAM Act's passage as a "watershed event" that will help defeat spammers relying on fraud and evasion, while eBay Inc. called the enactment "great news." Yahoo Inc. said the legislation is "a victory for consumers and the Internet" and will provide important new legal weapons for businesses fighting spam. The link for this article located at InfoWorld is no longer available. . The Telephone Consumer Protection Act enforces rules on telemarketing calls, strengthening regulations against intrusive sales pitches.. Email Compliance, Spam Legislation, CAN-SPAM Act, Commercial Messaging. . Anthony Pell
Dec 17, 2003
•
Government
81
email marketingemail regulationspam legislationAnalyzing the CAN-SPAM Act's Influence on Email Marketing Strategies
Its only fair that we publish a different, more hopeful point of view on the CAN-SPAM issue. Larry Seltzer at eWeek writes that this law, while certainly not the silver bullet to end all spam, is still a welcome start.. . .. Its only fair that we publish a different, more hopeful point of view on the CAN-SPAM issue. Larry Seltzer at eWeek writes that this law, while certainly not the silver bullet to end all spam, is still a welcome start. We appear to be on the verge of having a national law on the problem of spam. The CAN-SPAM act would preempt the numerous attempts that have been made by various states to regulate the issue. (Here's a PDF file of the latest version of the bill.) There's a lot of common sense in the bill and it's both good for the covered spamming practices to be made illegal and important that this become a national law. But the CAN-SPAM act won't make a substantial difference in the actual amount of spam you receive. CAN-SPAM is actually an acronym for the full name of the bill: "Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003." The version I linked to above is the one most recently passed by the Senate. The final version will be very close to it and President Bush is expected to sign it. The link for this article located at eWeek is no longer available. . Enacted in 2003, the CAN-SPAM Act aimed to regulate unsolicited emails, enhancing consumer control and promoting ethical email marketing practices. CAN-SPAM Act, Digital Communication Policy, Email Marketing Law, Spam Regulations. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Dec 10, 2003
•
Privacy
81
legal implicationsemail complianceuser protectionUnderstanding The CAN-SPAM Act: Legal Challenges And User Impact
Well, the CAN-SPAM act finally passed through the its final hurdles in Congress, and with Bush promising a signature within the year, it will be law soon. But will it protect you?. . .. Well, the CAN-SPAM act finally passed through the its final hurdles in Congress, and with Bush promising a signature within the year, it will be law soon. But will it protect you? Not if you ask CAUCE , or some of the other major anti-spam groups out there. While many mainstream news sources will point out that 'experts' see this as insufficient protection against foreign spam, that really misses the point. It seems clear that this bill is a response to the massive public outcry against spam, but not a serious attempt to stem the tide, even from the United States. That is to say, it is insufficient protection againt any spam. In this age of easily crafted mail-headers, home PCs being used as spammer's drones, and phantom spammer accounts appearing and disappearing like the morning dew, the real problem is one of enforcement. Simply put, there is no real non-repudiation technology in IP, and the federal and state DAs openly admit that they do not have the resources to even begin to tackle the incredible problem that anonymous spammers pose to law enforcement. In other words, unless we can help ourselves, the government can do little to help. Nor can one simply go after the companies who use the spammers' services. It is all too easy to imagine that a disgruntled former-employee could spam on a company's "behalf" in order to get the company punished. Nor could this victim company do anything whatsoever to prevent this from occuring. Thus the presence of the spam itself is clearly insufficient evidence to implicate the company, and naturally, any company questioned on it will deny involvment in the spamming campaigns they order. It will be absolutely impossible to prove otherwise (even to the point of finding a 'preponderance of evidence' necessary in a civil suit) unless the spammers are caught andtestify against their employers. Even worse, the CAN-SPAM act will give any spammer a free shot at our inboxes. So long as they use honest headers, they are allowed to send us as much spam as they want, until we opt out. Now, everyone will claim to allow opt-out, but if this is put to the test, it will be easy to claim that multiple marketing companies were hired. (If this responsibility is pegged to the company that supposedly ordered the spam sent, then the disgruntled former-employee will now have that easy attack against the company in their sights). In other words, there is no reasonable way to enforce opt-out! It goes without saying, of course, that without massive law-enforcement resources, or the clear ability of private ISPs and businesses to sue for damages, the 'honest-header' part is also meaningless drivel. However, this leads us to the final point; the capstone, if you will. Specifially allowing opt-out spam does have the effect of making it nearly impossible to privately sue spammers, both for ISPs and for end-users. Why? Because now, everyone will claim to allow opt-out, and for various obvious reasons, it will be virtually impossible to prove otherwise. What does this mean to you? That this law is actually pro-spam . It pretends to try to protect us, but really all it does is shield spammers from liability. Its hard to imagine that the bill's sponsors did not realize this. It is also impossible to imagine a Congressperson voting against a measure that is supposed to help protect us from spam. In essence, Congress has done the bidding of the DMA, which lobbies them quite heavily, while cynically pretending to be protecting the interests of the people. So hold on and get protection, people. Its going to be a rough ride. The link for this article located at ZDNet.com is no longer available. . The Anti-Spam Law enacted by lawmakers may inadvertently protect spammers under certain conditions; here's what it implies for consumers.. CAN-SPAM Act, LegislationReview, Email Oversight. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Dec 09, 2003
•
Privacy
82
consumer protectionemail regulationspam legislationU.S. House Approves CAN-SPAM Act: Key Email Legislation Passed
Capping six years of federal legislative wrangling, the U.S. House of Representatives has passed antispam legislation intended to create extensive regulations for commercial e-mail.. . .. Capping six years of federal legislative wrangling, the U.S. House of Representatives has passed antispam legislation intended to create extensive regulations for commercial e-mail. The Senate, which last week passed a similar bill, is expected to agree to the changes in the House bill this week. President Bush has said he will sign the measure into law. The bill, called "Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act," or CAN-SPAM, will outlaw most junk e-mail and create a "do not spam" registry for opting out of commercial messages. The law, which would overrule state antispam laws, makes violators liable for fines of up to US$250 per e-mail. But critics call CAN-SPAM a step backward. "The primary motivating factor here was a desire to pre-empt California's opt-in spam law," said Chris Hoofnagle, Electronic Privacy Information Center deputy counsel. "Consumers would have been served if no [federal] law would have passed." . Capping six years of federal legislative wrangling, the U.S. House of Representatives has passed ant. capping, years, federal, legislative, wrangling, house, representatives, passed. . Anthony Pell
Nov 25, 2003
•
Government
82
internet policyemail regulationspam controlAnalysis of New Anti-Spam Legislation: UK and California Perspectives
Legislation to ban or limit spam is proliferating almost as rapidly as the e-mails that promise to provide a slim, wealthy, well-endowed, sexually satisfied life. But antispam advocates disagree over whether legislation such as the recently passed United Kingdom and California . . . . Legislation to ban or limit spam is proliferating almost as rapidly as the e-mails that promise to provide a slim, wealthy, well-endowed, sexually satisfied life. But antispam advocates disagree over whether legislation such as the recently passed United Kingdom and California antispam laws will slow the flood of spam, due to loopholes that could be easily exploited by bulk e-mailers. Advocates and legal experts also warn that any local law will have, at best, a limited effect, and are calling for a consistent, comprehensive global ban on spam. "Overall we need a combination of new laws to let spam recipients and Internet service providers sue spammers to change the economics of spam, and modest technical improvements to Internet mail to make it easier to establish where a message really came from," said John Levine, a board member of the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail. The link for this article located at Wired is no longer available. . New laws aimed at curbing unwanted messages are emerging almost as swiftly as the digital ads that offer a life of luxury.. Spam Policy, Legislation Against Spam, Antispam Initiatives. . Anthony Pell
Sep 25, 2003
•
Government
81
email regulationspam legislationFTC initiativesImpact of FTC's Do-Not-Call List on Email Spam Legislation
Unwanted e-mail advertising has become the latest quality-of-life nuisance -- not unlike squeegee men -- that politicians love to attack. This spring, a consensus on spam seemed to be emerging among House and Senate leaders, Internet service providers and the direct . . . . Unwanted e-mail advertising has become the latest quality-of-life nuisance -- not unlike squeegee men -- that politicians love to attack. This spring, a consensus on spam seemed to be emerging among House and Senate leaders, Internet service providers and the direct marketing industry, which had dropped its objection to any regulation of e-mail. Several bills were introduced, all narrowly focused on fraudulent e-mail that misrepresented the sender or the product for sale. Then a monkey wrench landed in this otherwise smooth legislative process. In June, the Federal Trade Commission started collecting phone numbers from people who do not want to be called by telemarketers. Phone solicitors who call numbers on the list, once it takes effect in October, can be punished with large fines. Overnight, the do-not-call list became one of the most popular government initiatives in recent memory, with people registering an average of a million phone numbers a day in the first month. The link for this article located at NYTimes is no longer available. . Unsolicited promotional messages are now facing new regulations, similar to the do-not-call registry set up by the Federal Trade Commission.. email marketing regulations, spam laws, FTC policies, do-not-call initiatives. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Aug 11, 2003
•
Privacy
81
online threatsspam legislationcitizen impactImpact of Antispam Laws on Today's Digital Communication Landscape
From a spam-viewing perspective, the average citizen, it would seem, is aging, balding, out of shape, impotent, undereducated and has incurred significant credit card debt through online encounters with other lusty members of the human race. . .. From a spam-viewing perspective, the average citizen, it would seem, is aging, balding, out of shape, impotent, undereducated and has incurred significant credit card debt through online encounters with other lusty members of the human race . The fact that this profile actually fits more than a few Americans makes the portrayal particularly galling. Of course, the opposite is also true. Women are increasingly annoyed by frequent offers to enlarge portions of the human anatomy that are only available to them through gender reassignment surgery. There is some solace. Apparently, there are a large number of Nigerian princesses, diamond mine owners and distressed government ministers who are anxious to share their millions with anyone in the United States who is willing to accept the money. Give them access to your bank account, and they will be happy to manage the electronic funds transfer. . From a spam-viewing perspective, the average citizen, it would seem, is aging, balding, out of shape. spam-viewing, perspective, average, citizen, would, aging, balding, shape. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Aug 05, 2003
•
Privacy
82
consumer protectionemail securityspam legislationFTC Seeks Congressional Support For New Spam-Fighting Authority
The Federal Trade Commission has put spam at the top of its hit list and wants congressional leaders to help bolster its fight against the pesky, costly junk e-mail that floods the in-boxes of consumers and businesses alike. The commission . . . . The Federal Trade Commission has put spam at the top of its hit list and wants congressional leaders to help bolster its fight against the pesky, costly junk e-mail that floods the in-boxes of consumers and businesses alike. The commission yesterday outlined its requests for more spam-fighting powers to House and Senate lawmakers. On its wish list? It wants the authority to keep tabs on spammers across international lines and to have the power to watch spammers incognito, sometimes with the help of other federal agency resources. Further, the FTC would like anyone who takes over a customer's e-mail account for the purpose of sending spam to be deemed an unauthorized user, stripping them of protections ISPs give to customers. The FTC also wants spam legislation to model what the government has already done to go after telemarketers, according to various published reports. * The link for this article located at Washington Post is no longer available. . The Federal Communications Commission is focusing on combating robocalls and is looking for legislative backing to enhance its authority against unwanted phone solicitations.. Spam Legislation, FTC Spam Initiatives, Email Security Measures. . Anthony Pell
Jun 12, 2003
•
Government
Get the latest News and Insights
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.
Community Poll
What got you started with Linux?
Search Topics
Powered By
Linux Security - Your source for Top Linux News, Advisories, HOWTOs and Feature Releases
QUICK LINKS
subscribe to newsletters!
Like staying secure? So do we.
Sign up for updates, tips, and alerts!
Discover faster search, smarter navigation, and deeper Linux security insights. Read More