Network Security
system security Linux network
system security Linux network The romanticized image of the digital nomad – a laptop on a sun-drenched balcony – rarely accounts for the actual friction of maintaining a professional development environment on the move. . The friction is amplified with Linux. We are looking for a setup that respects our kernel configurations, handles volatile network handovers, and maintains a strict security posture without the hand-holding of a consumer-grade OS – so, put simply, more than just a laptop and a sunny deck. The hardware is...
May 26, 2026
Server Securityopen-source Linux administration
open-source Linux administration Cron has existed in Unix and Linux environments for decades, handling backups, cleanup scripts, patching jobs, log rotation, monitoring tasks, and other maintenance work that administrators do not want to run manually. Most Linux servers rely on it constantly, which is exactly why attackers continue abusing it for persistence after a system has already been compromised. . Persistence through cron is not complicated. Attackers do not need a rootkit or advanced malware framework to maintain...
May 25, 2026
Vendors/Productssecurity breach linux
security breach linux A major internal repository breach at GitHub has exposed a critical and overlooked blind spot in Linux supply chain security. Kernel exploits, exposed SSH services, weak firewall rules, and vulnerable daemons dominated the Linux threat model for years, and in many environments, they still matter. But recent supply-chain incidents involving GitHub ecosystems, npm packages, and malicious developer tooling point somewhere else entirely: the developer workstation. . The breach matters because...
May 21, 2026
Security Trends access control multi-tenant
access control multi-tenant Linux administrators often face an ugly choice in the cloud: prioritize convenience and cost-efficiency by sharing infrastructure, or sacrifice those benefits for the sake of total isolation. Most modern Linux workloads don't live on their own private servers anymore. They live in shared environments like Kubernetes clusters, where multiple teams and services run side-by-side. It sounds efficient, and it usually is. . But cloud isolation isn't as ironclad as it looks on the diagram. If you...
May 21, 2026
Vendors/Productsincident response cloud security
incident response cloud security Managed Extended Detection and Response (MXDR) has become one of the most sought-after security services in the enterprise market — and with good reason. It promises the holy grail: broad visibility across endpoints, network, cloud, email, and identity, combined with the 24/7 human expertise most organizations simply cannot build in-house. . However, the rapid growth of the market has produced a wide range of providers whose capabilities vary considerably beneath the surface. Choosing the...
May 19, 2026
Refine news
X Clear Filters
Get the latest News and Insights
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.
Community Poll
What got you started with Linux?
Loading...
Explore Latest Linux Security news
We found 6 articles for you...
82
Chinaemail compliancespam regulationChina Fines Company 5,000 Yuan For Spam Regulation Breach
The Chinese government has fined a company 5,000 yuan renminbi (. Xinhua, the Chinese government's news agency, said under the regulation commercial emails must be sent with the text 'AD' in the header and must contain options for recipients to subscribe or cancel further messages. If they fail to do this they can be fined up to 30,000 yuan ( The link for this article located at Silicon is no longer available. . Xinhua, the Chinese government's news agency, said under the regulation commercial emails must be se. chinese, government, fined, company, renminbi, xinhua, government's. . Brittany Day
Aug 22, 2006
•
Government
78
email compliancespam regulationFTC settlementKodak Pays Penalty For Email Non-Compliance In Spam Case
A digital photo-sharing service run by Eastman Kodak Co. settled charges it sent e-mails to 2 million recipients and failed to give them a way to opt out of future messages, the Federal Trade Commission said Thursday. Kodak Imaging Network, previously known as Ofoto Inc., agreed to pay a $26,331 penalty for violating a U.S. law aimed at curbing spam. . The FTC said it imposed the penalty to recoup the total gross proceeds from the e-mail campaign and barred Kodak (Research) from future violations. U.S. law bars false or misleading headers on e-mails and requires commercial e-mailers to give recipients the option to not receive further solicitations. Solicitations must also be identified as advertisements and include a valid postal address under the CAN-SPAM Act. The link for this article located at www.cnn.com is no longer available. . Nikon resolved FTC allegations tied to unsolicited messages sent to 1.5 million recipients, facing fines but committing to regulatory adherence.. Kodak, Email Compliance, Spam Regulation, FTC Settlement, Digital Service. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
May 15, 2006
•
Vendors/Products
74
network securityspam regulationhacking caseFirst Wireless Hacking Case: CAN-SPAM Act Charges Against Tombros
A landmark case in America could prove it... A US citizen is thought to have become the first person to be accused of hacking a wireless network in order to send spam. Nicholas Tombros, 37, is charged under the US CAN-SPAM act, which aims to clamp down on unsolicited junk mail. . . .. A landmark case in America could prove it... A US citizen is thought to have become the first person to be accused of hacking a wireless network in order to send spam. Nicholas Tombros, 37, is charged under the US CAN-SPAM act, which aims to clamp down on unsolicited junk mail. Prosecutors allege that Tombros used a laptop to sniff out insecure residential wireless access points in a Los Angeles suburb, before using them to send spam across the internet. He faces a maximum sentence of three years' imprisonment. The link for this article located at Graeme Wearden is no longer available. . An unprecedented trial underscores the breaching of digital infrastructures by malicious actors, posing new threats to data protection across the nation.. Wireless Security, Spam Exploitation, Hacking Incidents, CAN-SPAM Act Enforcement. . Anthony Pell
Sep 08, 2004
•
Network Security
81
anti-spamemail compliancespam regulationAnalysis of CAN-SPAM Act Compliance Dramatically Decreased
LS: Some of you may remember that we at LinuxSecurity confidently predicted that the CAN-SPAM act was bound to fail. We might congratulate ourselves for this foresight, if only it weren't so obvious. No serious security or privacy expert thought that it stood a chance of reducing the volume of spam. Our question still remains: was CAN-SPAM really just a cover for Congress, so that they could pretend to be legislating against spam while instead doing the bidding of the Direct Marketing lobbyists? . . .. The numbers don't lie: CAN-SPAM is a bust. Compliance with CAN-SPAM has fallen to a new low, according to recent data collected by MX Logic. In July, compliance fell for the first time under one percent to a measly 0.54 percent of all unsolicited commercial mail the company sampled during the month. The Denver-based firm has been tracking compliance with CAN-SPAM since the federal law went on the books in January. Through April, MX Logic's numbers remained stable, with about three percent of spam messages complying with the law's requirements, which range from verifiable return addresses to measures consumers and businesses can use to opt out of mailing lists. In May and June, however, the number slipped to one percent. "Now it's been halved," said Steve Ruskin, a senior analyst at MX Logic. "No one's really sure what's going on, but it's clear that CAN-SPAM isn't a threat to spammers. They're just ignoring it." Although hardcore spammers -- the relatively small number who account for the bulk of the world's spam -- were never likely to toe the line, said Ruskin, it's possible that some spammers who were complying have stopped. The blame, he said, could be laid on law enforcement, which hasn't exactly been successful in tracking down on spammers. Some individuals have been stymied -- most recently a Boca Raton resident whose assets were frozen by the courts -- but enforcement is the exception rather than the rule. The link for this article located at techweb.com is no longer available. . The numbers don'tlie: CAN-SPAM is a bust.Compliance with CAN-SPAM has fallen to a new low, accordin. remember, linuxsecurity, confidently, predicted, can-spam. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Aug 06, 2004
•
Privacy
81
email privacyspam regulationdigital safetyFTC's New Labeling Rule On Sexually Explicit Email Spam
Will this new rule help rid inboxes of unwanted sexually explicit spam? It is doubtful. One of the arguments of the Can-Spam act is that it does nothing to reduce the amount of spam, only make the spam that is sent legal. This new rule does the same. Yes it may help in creating inbox rules to shuffle the spam off to the deleted items folder, but it does nothing to help curb the amount received (unless the spammers run afoul of the law and are shut down). The people who will adopt the rules will be in the minority, mainly because the majority of spam (sexually explicit or not) comes from outside of the United States and are out of the reach of the law. Luckily, there are legislators who recognize the Can-Spam act has had little effect on the spam problem and are urging the FTC to clamp down on the businesses who are using spammers to solicit their wares. . . . . In April, the FTC adopted a rule that requires spam which contains sexually oriented material to include the warning "SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT:" in the subject line. That rule went into effect on Wednesday. In addition to the subject label, the rule mandates an "electronic brown paper wrapper" that prohibits sexually oriented material from residing in the "initially viewable area" of the email message. The rule changes were meant to clearly identify sexually explicit material a user may not want to view and to prevent porn images from being seen immediately if a user inadvertently opens such an email. To see such material, the email must be formatted so the user must initiate action (such as clicking a link or scrolling down) to view the content. Violators could be subject to jail time and/or fines up to US$500,000. The article located at arsTechnica is no longer available. . In April, the FTC adopted a rule that requires spam which contains sexually oriented material to inc. inboxes, unwanted, sexually, explicit, doubtful. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
May 21, 2004
•
Privacy
81
legal precedentemail marketingspam regulationCalifornia $2 Million Fine for Historic Spam Email Marketing Case
In a historic first, a California court has fined an Internet marketing company $2 million for sending millions of unsolicited junk e-mails. The case was brought against PW Marketing, a Los Angeles-based Internet advertising company owned by Paul Willis and . . . . In a historic first, a California court has fined an Internet marketing company $2 million for sending millions of unsolicited junk e-mails. The case was brought against PW Marketing, a Los Angeles-based Internet advertising company owned by Paul Willis and Claudia Griffin. The court found the company liable for sending a large quantity of spam that sold a $39 "how to" book for spammers and provided extensive lists of e-mail addresses. California expects the ruling to set a precedent for further aggressive antispam legal action. But regardless of this high-profile case, California's legal efforts "ultimately will not change the volume of spam," says Yankee Group analyst J. P. Gownder. . In a historic first, a California court has fined an Internet marketing company $2 million for sendi. historic, first, california, court, fined, internet, marketing, company, million, sendi. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Oct 28, 2003
•
Privacy
81
spam regulationinternet lawlegal issuesJohn Marshall Law School Introduces Course on Spam Regulation
Law students at Chicago's John Marshall Law School are getting a new dose of spam--on their course schedule. The spam serving comes courtesy of John Marshall associate professor David Sorkin, who's offering what he and his peers say may be . . . . Law students at Chicago's John Marshall Law School are getting a new dose of spam--on their course schedule. The spam serving comes courtesy of John Marshall associate professor David Sorkin, who's offering what he and his peers say may be the first law school course devoted to the subject of unsolicited commercial e-mail. "This seminar will investigate legal and policy issues raised by e-mail marketing and spam," Sorkin wrote in describing the summer seminar, titled "Current Topics in Information Technology Law: Regulation of Spam and E-mail Marketing." "Topics to be addressed include litigation and legislation involving spam and e-mail marketing; the application of tort law and other traditional doctrines to spam; concerns related to constitutionality, jurisdiction, extraterritoriality, privacy, content and public policy; regulatory perspectives; issues faced by Internet service providers and legitimate e-mail marketers; legal aspects of blacklisting and other antispam measures; and other relevant issues." Sorkin, who in 1995 taught one of the first courses devoted to Internet law and who maintains a Web repository of passed and pending spam laws, has long touted the applicability of traditional law to the Internet. He has warned against legislation drafted specifically for online contexts, saying that new spam bills, in particular, have the potential to worsen the problem they're designed to alleviate. The link for this article located at ZDNet.com is no longer available. . Law students at Chicago's John Marshall Law School are getting a new dose of spam--on their course s. students, chicago's, marshall, school, getting, spam--on, their, course. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Jun 04, 2003
•
Privacy
81
court rulinglegal precedentspam regulationEighth Circuit Court Ruling Validates Junk Fax Restrictions on Spam
Attempts to reduce unsolicited emails may be helped by a federal court ruling that junk faxes can be restricted by law. A federal appeals court said on Friday that a law restricting junk faxes was constitutional, setting a precedent that favours legal attempts to restrict unsolicited email. . . .. Attempts to reduce unsolicited emails may be helped by a federal court ruling that junk faxes can be restricted by law. A federal appeals court said on Friday that a law restricting junk faxes was constitutional, setting a precedent that favours legal attempts to restrict unsolicited email. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's ruling, concluding that a 1991 federal law banning unsolicited fax advertising did not violate the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of expression. Congress' goal of "restricting unsolicited fax advertisements in order to prevent the cost shifting and interference such unwanted advertising places on the recipient" was reasonable, a three-judge panel ruled. The link for this article located at zdnet is no longer available. . The recent federal court decision regarding unsolicited faxes could pave the way for more stringent regulations on unwanted email communications.. Spam Regulation, Email Restrictions, Legal Precedent. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Mar 24, 2003
•
Privacy
Get the latest News and Insights
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.
Community Poll
What got you started with Linux?
Search Topics
Powered By
Linux Security - Your source for Top Linux News, Advisories, HOWTOs and Feature Releases
QUICK LINKS
subscribe to newsletters!
Like staying secure? So do we.
Sign up for updates, tips, and alerts!
Explore top 10 tips to secure your open-source projects now. Read More