Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 619
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 619

Stay Ahead With Linux Security News

Filter Icon Refine news
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

What got you started with Linux?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/150-what-got-you-started-with-linux?task=poll.vote&format=json
150
radio
0
[{"id":483,"title":"Self-taught through trial and error","votes":548,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":78.51,"resources":[]},{"id":484,"title":"Formal training or courses","votes":30,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":4.3,"resources":[]},{"id":485,"title":"A job that required it","votes":34,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":4.87,"resources":[]},{"id":486,"title":"Other","votes":86,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":12.32,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security news

We found 0 articles for you...
209

Using Static Analysis for Continuous Assurance in Open Source Security

Open Source lends itself to a new way of certifying software: Continuous Assurance. In this approach, automated tools and processes ensure that, as code changes, it continually satisfies compliance, quality, and security requirements. "Continuous Assurance integrates directly into development and benefits from the always-up-to-date nature of cloud services, making it a perfect match for Open Source." . Sonatype’s 2020 State of the Software Supply Chain Report found that next generation cyber-attacks actively targeting open-source soft- ware projects increased 430% over the past 12 months. Industry and the Open Source communities recognize heightened security risks and are working to solve these. For example, in August 2020 the Linux Foundation launched the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), billing itself as “a cross-industry collaboration that brings together leaders to improve the security of open-source software.” The Foundation notes how pervasive open source has become, and how critical it is to bring together open-source security initiatives and those who support them to advance open-source security for all stakeholders. . Continuous Assurance and static analysis play crucial roles in enhancing open source security and ensuring compliance throughout the software development lifecycle. open source security, static analysis, cyber attacks, software compliance, Continuous Assurance. . Brittany Day

Calendar 2 Nov 04, 2020 User Avatar Brittany Day Security Trends
78

RIPS Static Analyzer For PHP Web Apps: Security Insights and Tools

RIPS is a tool written in PHP to find vulnerabilities using static source code analysis for PHP web applications. By tokenizing and parsing all source code files RIPS is able to transform PHP source code into a program model and to detect sensitive sinks (potentially vulnerable functions) that can be tainted by user input (influenced by a malicious user) during the program flow. . Besides the structured output of found vulnerabilities RIPS also offers an integrated code audit framework for further manual analysis. The link for this article located at Darknet is no longer available. . RIPS delivers static analysis for PHP, identifying security flaws and supplying a comprehensive audit system for enhanced protection.. PHP Security,Vulnerability Detection,Static Analysis,Code Audit Framework. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar 2 Oct 21, 2014 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Vendors/Products
79

Coverity Scan Report: 16% Reduction In Open Source Defects

The quality and security levels of open source code are continuing to improve, according to the latest annual audit by code analysis tools vendor Coverity.. The third edition of the Coverity Scan Open Source report measured a 16 per cent reduction in static analysis defect density over the past three years among the projects subjected to scrutiny, including Firefox, Linux, PHP, Ruby and Samba. The report covers analysis of more than 11 billion lines of code from 280 open source projects. Beween 2006 and 2009, more than 11,200 defects in open source programs have been fixed thanks to Coverity - 2, 700 of those in the last year. The link for this article located at The Register is no longer available. . The latest release of the Coverity Scan Open Source report reported a 16 percent decline in the density of static analysis defects.. Code Quality Improvement, Defect Density, Open Source Projects. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar 2 Sep 25, 2009 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Security Projects
82

Coverity 2008 Open Source Software Security Report Highlights

SAN FRANCISCO - May 20, 2008 - CoverityT, Inc., the leader in improving software quality and security, today announced the availability of the Scan Report on Open Source Software 2008. The Coverity Scan site was developed with support from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security as part of the federal government's 'Open Source Hardening Project.' The report is based on 2 years of analysis of more than 55 million lines of code on a recurring basis from over 250 popular open source projects with Coverity PreventT, the industry-leading static source code analysis solution. This projects seems to be on the right track in improving open-source security. What do you think? Will this project make a big impact on code quality and security?. . SAN FRANCISCO - May 20, 2008 - CoverityT, Inc., the leader in improving software quality and securit. francisco, coverityt, leader, improving, software, quality, securit. . Bill Locke

Calendar 2 May 23, 2008 User Avatar Bill Locke Government
77

Introducing ITS4: Command-Line Tool for C/C++ Security Audits

John Viega posted the following message to bugtraq announcing a new security auditing tool. "I've put together a command-line tool for statically scanning C and C++ source code for security vulnerabilities. The tool is . . .. John Viega posted the following message to bugtraq announcing a new security auditing tool. "I've put together a command-line tool for statically scanning C and C++ source code for security vulnerabilities. The tool is called ITS4. ITS4 scans through source code for potentially dangerous function calls that are stored in a database. Anything that is in the database gets flagged. ITS4 tries to automate a lot of the grepping usually done by hand when performing security audits. The tool is available from: Also on this site is a research paper on ITS4 submitted to this year's Usenix Security conference. ITS4 is open source software. The license puts some minor restrictions on commercial use. In essence, you can't use this tool to make money (such as by reselling it, or by using it in a consulting practice). However, you are encouraged to run the tool on your own product in order to make it better. ITS4 does more than just grep-type work. It allows for arbitrary handlers to refine the initial analysis. This version of ITS4 comes with some simple handlers. Some of these handlers check for uses of common string operations that often are not significant problems. For example: strcpy(buf, "\n"); sprintf(buf, "%d", i); In the first case, ITS4 will look at the second argument to a strcpy. If it is a string constant, the severity of the problem site is reduced to the lowest possible level. The tool will not output this kind of problem in its standard mode. In the second case, a similar reduction in severity occurs, since the sprintf format string contains no %s's. The tool also has handlers that scan for file access race conditions, similar to the prototype tool discussed in [BD96]. We slightly improve on their toolby allowing for interprocedural and intermodular problems. There are some technical limitations to this tool, many of which we hope to improve in the future. We'd like to have the help of the security community. I'm personally dedicated to improving this tool, and Reliable Software Technologies is willing to put some resources towards doing so. Changes from the community will certainly be considered for inclusion in future ITS4 releases. Currently, the weakest area of ITS4, where the input of the security community is most important, is the vulnerability database, which was largely taken from some very preliminary work done by Tom O'Connor. It's perhaps a good start, but far from complete. Many new things could be added, and the entries that do exist can likely be improved substantially. For each database entry, we have a description, a default severity, and a recommended alternative. Generally, the descriptions are pretty scant, and the severities are not overly well thought out. The next area for improvement is the handlers. It would be great to see people writing some good handlers, or even suggesting good handlers, and then we could write them. Beyond that we're interested in the following: 1) Flagging the allocation mechanism used on important variables (i.e., stack-allocated buffers are usually easier to exploit than heap-allocated buffers if there is an overflow). 2) Performing much better static analysis. We'd probably like to start by building some sort of heuristic alias analysis, and then doing something similar to the analysis done in [WF+00]. We do have plans to ultimately do these things, but if other people want to code them up and contribute to the project, that's great. I've set up a mailing list for people who are interested in helping out in any capacity. Hopefully we can get a good discussion going that will improve the vulnerability database, and make ITS4 a far more useful tool. The mailing list signup is available at: . John Viega Software Security Group Co-founder Reliable Software Technologies This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. References: [BD96] M. Bishop and M. Dilger. Checking for race conditions in file accesses. Computing Systems, 9(2):131-152, Spring 1996. [WF+00] D. Wagner, J. Foster, E. Brewer, and A. Aiken. A first step towards automated detection of buffer overrun vulnerabilities. In Proceedings of the Year 2000 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), pages 3-17, San Diego, CA, 2000.. John Viega posted the following message to bugtraq announcing a new security auditing tool. 'I've pu. viega, posted, message, bugtraq, announcing, security, auditing, 'i've. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar 2 Feb 22, 2000 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Server Security
News Add Esm H340

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

What got you started with Linux?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/150-what-got-you-started-with-linux?task=poll.vote&format=json
150
radio
0
[{"id":483,"title":"Self-taught through trial and error","votes":548,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":78.51,"resources":[]},{"id":484,"title":"Formal training or courses","votes":30,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":4.3,"resources":[]},{"id":485,"title":"A job that required it","votes":34,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":4.87,"resources":[]},{"id":486,"title":"Other","votes":86,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":12.32,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Your message here