Overly broad permissions can turn one compromised account into a much larger security problem. Learn how to reduce unnecessary access, review privileges, and apply least privilege across modern Linux systems. Review Linux Privileges×

Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 507
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 507

Stay Ahead With Linux Security News

Filter%20icon Refine news
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security news

We found 8 articles for you...
209

AI-Driven Automation in Linux Admin: Evolving Roles and Security Risks

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance, many industries are experiencing dramatic transformation, with Linux administration being no exception. Open-source Linux admin jobs have long been at the core of maintaining and protecting servers and systems. . Yet, today, more tasks that were once performed manually and were time-consuming are becoming automated. Technological progress promises increased efficiency and cost-cutting benefits; however, this technology also raises important questions regarding job security and potential security implications. What happens when the tasks traditionally carried out by experienced administrators, such as monitoring, automated patching, backup management, configuration handling, and user access controls, are given to AI? In this article, we'll look closer at five Linux admin tasks at risk of being replaced by AI and LLMs as we explore new security challenges and opportunities that this shift brings. The Rise of AI in Linux Administration Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) are making waves across various industries, but one area undergoing profound change is Linux administration. Open-source Linux systems administration has long been essential to keeping servers and systems operating smoothly and securely. Still, advances in AI and automation technology mean many tasks previously handled by skilled human administrators are now being taken over by intelligent systems - creating exciting opportunities and new security concerns. The Shift in Routine System Monitoring One of the key functions of a Linux administrator is routine system monitoring , which involves tracking system performance, examining logs for unusual activities, and assuring overall system health. Previously, these tasks required direct attention from experienced administrators who relied on keen observations of anomalies or potential issues to spot them; now, AI-powered tools can perform these functions withunprecedented speed and accuracy. AI algorithms can continuously monitor systems, analyze large amounts of log data in real-time, identify patterns that indicate problems, and anticipate potential failures before they happen, enabling proactive maintenance. While this increases efficiency and decreases downtime, relying too heavily on AI can diminish human administration in routine tasks. The security implications of this shift could be severe. Over-relying on automation might mean an anomaly doesn't fit with what the AI learned, which may result in it getting overlooked entirely. At the same time, AI can enhance monitoring. However, human involvement should remain active to address any unique or nuanced issues it might miss. Automating Patching and Updates Applying security patches and updates is another essential task of Linux admins. Ensuring all systems remain up-to-date is an ongoing task necessary for maintaining both security and functionality. AI tools in this space aim to automate patch management by determining when it would best to apply patches to minimize disruption and verify they've been successfully applied. Automating security hygiene can be immensely helpful in ensuring systems are protected against new vulnerabilities without needing manual checks every few weeks. However, these automated systems must be carefully configured and monitored. AI may misjudge patch impacts or fail to recognize complex dependencies within system architecture, leading to unexpected downtime or system failures. Furthermore, AI systems could be subject to sophisticated attacks to exploit their decision-making patterns. Transforming Backup and Recovery Management Backup and recovery management are other areas in which AI is making strides. Traditional methods involve setting schedules, verifying completion rates, and ensuring recovery processes remain effective and up-to-date. With AI, backup strategies will become more dynamic and responsive, adapting rapidly to meet real-time system needs. AI can predict when backups are necessary based on system usage patterns and ensure critical data is always protected. AI also has the potential to streamline recovery procedures in an emergency by shortening the time needed to restore systems to functional states. Unfortunately, such capabilities also present new security risks. Backup systems must be protected against tampering attempts, while administrators must maintain data integrity during processing. Relying heavily on AI for recovery processes requires robust contingency plans should AI encounter any problems. Evolving Configuration Management Configuration management involves setting and maintaining system configurations to meet organizational policies and remain consistent over time. Tools like Ansible , Puppet , and Chef already automate much of this process, but AI takes it one step further by optimizing and automating configurations dynamically. AI systems can continuously assess and adjust configurations based on real-time needs and security policies, eliminating human error while increasing compliance. Unfortunately, the dynamic nature of AI-driven configuration adjustments may also accidentally create misconfigurations when misinterpreting policies or system requirements. Similarly, any automated system's effectiveness depends on its data and rules. AI systems must be correctly configured to prevent security lapses. User and Access Management Revolutionized Establishing and administering user accounts, along with access controls and permissions , are a crucial component of Linux security. Yet, AI integration into this area allows it to streamline account creation while dynamically assigning permissions based on user behavior and detecting potential security breaches by analyzing access patterns. Automation can improve security by quickly adapting to emerging threats and narrowing the window of opportunity for malicious actors. Unfortunately, AI's use for managing user access introduces risks if compromised or misconfiguredsystems grant excessive permissions or lock out legitimate users. This requires robust audit trails and manual oversight as mitigation strategies against this possibility. Navigating Security Implications As AI assumes more Linux administration tasks, the security implications become significant. On the one hand, AI can assist in upholding higher standards by automating routine tasks, maintaining consistency across systems, and swiftly responding to known threats. Yet, AI systems could become targets of attack from malicious actors trying to exploit decision-making processes or vulnerabilities within their logic. As AI-drive administration increases, admins will require new skills. They must learn how to securely configure AI systems and interpret their outputs. Furthermore, while routine tasks may decrease with this change, the complexity and critical nature of any remaining tasks could increase, necessitating both traditional and AI expertise to be deployed efficiently. Our Final Thoughts: Embracing Change with Caution Integrating AI into Linux administration is more than a trend - it marks a dramatic advancement. AI promises increased efficiency, consistency, and security. However, its implementation must be approached carefully to minimize risks while reaping maximum benefits without compromising security. As AI advances, Linux admins must adapt quickly to these new tools while upholding expertise and maintaining vigilant oversight to remain safe against evolving challenges. Balancing automation with human oversight will be key in helping navigate this transformative period and ensure systems remain safe and resilient against evolving challenges. . AI promises to automate Linux admin tasks, increasing efficiency yet raising security and job concerns.. as artificial, intelligence, large, language, models, (llms), continue, advance. . Brittany Day

Calendar%202 Feb 17, 2025 User Avatar Brittany Day Security Trends
210

OpenSSH regreSSHion Bug: Urgent Actions Needed to Address Critical Threat

The infamous OpenSSH "regreSSHion" vulnerability, CVE-2024-6387, sent shockwaves through the Linux security community when it was discovered this past summer. This critical flaw threatens a core component of Linux system security: OpenSSH. . Used widely for remote login and other network services, any breach could have devastating repercussions: attackers could gain unwarranted access, elevate privileges, or execute malicious code that leads to data breaches, system disruptions, and loss of control over affected systems. With attackers now having access to PoC code to exploit this vulnerability directly, security admins must take immediate action against any attacks attempting to exploit this bug to harm their systems. I'll explain how this exploit works and its potential impacts and offer practical advice for securing your systems against this threat. Understanding the OpenSSH regreSSHion Bug The notorious "regreSSHion" vulnerability exploits weaknesses in OpenSSH's handling of SSH sessions, potentially allowing attackers to execute code remotely by manipulating specific session parameters during authentication or connection establishment. Attackers could gain unauthorized access and perform operations with elevated privileges by sending maliciously structured packets or exploiting buffer overflows in its protocol implementation. This vulnerability affects OpenSSH versions 8.5p1 through 9.8p1 on glibc-based Linux systems, as these contain flawed code that could allow attackers to gain unauthorized system access. As is always recommended with critical vulnerabilities, the best course of action to limit potential risks is updating to the most recent version, where any known issues have been rectified by applying security patches provided by OpenSSH maintainers. Immediate Mitigation Requires Patching & Updates For Linux security admins, the first and most essential step in securing against this bug is applying all patches and updates provided by OpenSSH maintainers. When criticalvulnerabilities such as CVE-2024-6387 emerge, the OpenSSH team responds quickly by issuing patches that remove exploitable security flaws. Quickly updating all systems running OpenSSH can close off potential openings used by attackers to gain entry and exploit any vulnerabilities present. Enhancing Authentication Practices Patches are only the first step toward strengthening authentication methods against "regreSSHion." SSH access is essential to administrative duties, so its security should remain tight. Strong passwords should always be used; however, moving beyond password-based methods into key-based methods provides an extra layer of protection. Public key authentication eliminates password entry and decreases the risk of brute-force attacks. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) can further strengthen security. With MFA in place, even if an attacker gains SSH credentials, they would still require additional forms of verification - like time-based one-time passwords (TOTPs). Implementing MFA can significantly decrease the risk of unauthorized access. Limit SSH Access Another effective protection measure is to limit SSH access as much as possible. SSH should only be accessible from trusted IP addresses. Setting firewall rules that permit connections from specific IP ranges or networks can reduce the attack surface significantly. After all, any PoC exploit used will not have any effect against systems that attackers cannot reach. Consider tools such as fail2ban for additional restrictions. This system analyzes authentication logs and blocks IP addresses that display any sign of suspicious activity, providing an extra safeguard against potential exploit attempts. Vigilant Monitoring and Network Analysis Staying aware and responding swiftly to potential intrusions is critical to maintaining system integrity and security. Implementing robust monitoring solutions capable of detecting suspicious activities and alerting administrators quickly is essential. Network traffic analysistools like Snort can aid in quickly recognizing patterns indicative of attacks for timely intervention. We strongly recommend establishing an Intrusion Detection or Intrusion Prevention System (IDS/IPS). These systems can monitor traffic and system logs and alert administrators of activities that deviate from the norm. Security teams can quickly detect potential exploits by monitoring network traffic on ports typically used by SSH clients. Regular Audits and User Activity Monitoring Conducting frequent software audits is another effective strategy for creating a secure environment. Unnecessary or outdated software can introduce vulnerabilities, providing potential attack vectors. Regular audits and frequent checks ensure that only essential and up-to-date software packages remain installed, decreasing the risk of exploitation. Monitoring user activity helps detect and combat suspicious actions, including login attempts from unfamiliar locations or unauthorized access to sensitive files that might indicate compromise. Implementing robust user activity monitoring enhances our ability to detect and respond to potential threats quickly. Staying Informed and Proactive Staying informed on the latest security threats is vital to effective defense. Reviewing LinuxSecurity advisories and subscribing to LinuxSecurity newsletters will keep you abreast of potential vulnerabilities, patches, or mitigation solutions as soon as they become known. Be prepared to act swiftly when new information is available! Our Final Thoughts on Mitigating This Notorious OpenSSH Flaw The "regreSSHion" (CVE-2024-6387) vulnerability must be treated as an immediate and critical threat, with newly available proof-of-concept code increasing risks to Linux systems. Urgent measures should be implemented immediately to counter this threat and secure all affected Linux devices. Applying patches, strengthening authentication mechanisms, restricting SSH access, and implementing stringent monitoring practices areessential to protect systems against potential exploits. Regular software audits, user activity monitoring, and staying abreast of emerging threats are foundational practices to ensuring adequate security in your Linux environment and providing protection from vulnerabilities like "regreSSHion." Taking such proactive steps can help safeguard our systems effectively against emerging risks like the "regreSSHion" flaw. Implementing these measures requires concerted effort and a commitment to avoiding new and known risks, but their benefits cannot be ignored. By prioritizing security and utilizing all available tools and best practices, we can protect our systems from this critical vulnerability and others that arise in the future. . Immediate updates and protective actions are essential for a significant OpenSSH vulnerability to protect Unix-like environments.. OpenSSH Security, regreSSHion Exploit, Remote Access Vulnerabilities, Linux Authentication Best Practices. . Brittany Day

Calendar%202 Jan 08, 2025 User Avatar Brittany Day Security Vulnerabilities
77

Securing Linux: Addressing Malware Risks and Enhancing Server Protection

In this digital age, Linux servers face unprecedented challenges posed by cyber threats. These, in turn, introduce new vulnerabilities that system administrators must address. Traditionally considered a more secure environment compared to other operating systems such as Windows or macOS, Linux is presently under attack from malware strains of different types and sophisticated attack vectors. . In this article, I’ll provide a comprehensive overview of the existing Linux security landscape, the vectors that expose Linux servers to attacks, and the significance of Arch Linux security updates , delivering actionable insights to help you enhance your server security strategy. Understanding the Evolving Linux Threat Landscape Traditionally, Linux users have enjoyed relative security, as many believed malware and computer viruses targeted mainly proprietary operating systems. However, as cybercriminals have become more intelligent, Linux servers have been considered one of the most profitable targets. IBM reports that malware targeting Linux has increased. Linux malware strains such as Cloud Snooper, EvilGnome, HiddenWasp, QNAPCrypt, GonnaCry, FBOT, and Tycoon have been revealed. This type of malware employs new techniques to hide its presence and infect servers, thus being highly disruptive. Th e CISA i ndicates that Linux servers have become easy targets for attacks. It showed that about 70% of web servers run on Linux and are, therefore, open to attacks by hackers. In addition, Forbes reported that about 45% of all Linux vulnerabilities were exploited in the wild. According to a study by the Ponemon Institute, the average data breach cost reached an astonishing $4.45 million in 2023, again underscoring the financial consequences of security complacency. These numbers directly correlate with an uptick in targeted attacks against Linux systems and reinforce the importance of solid security investments within organizations. How Secure Is Linux? Linux offers even greater securitybenefits in the face of increasing threats than proprietary operating systems. Because of its open-source code, thousands of programmers and safety experts continuously check and watch it. The results of such combined vigilance include quickly locating and patching weak points versus the often sluggish and non-transparent ways of patching closed-source software. One of Linux's strong selling points is its strict privilege model for the user, which severely restricts root and thus minimizes unauthorized access and privilege escalation. The operating system has a set of default defenses , including packet filtering kernel firewalls, firmware verification via UEFI Secure Boot configuration using the Linux Kernel Lockdown, and Mandatory Access Control systems such as SELinux and AppArmor. This helps increase security by controlling how programs interact with each other and the rest of the system. While these features provide a strong defense, the Linux system is still vulnerable to misconfigurations and poor service management. For example, services configured incorrectly or with default settings introduce vulnerabilities that cybercriminals can easily leverage. This demands that all users adopt positive habits that establish security properly in their environments since inherent features alone cannot guarantee good security. Best Methods Securing Linux Servers Against Modern Threats Administrators should ensure that various best practices are followed to maximize the security of Linux systems in the present environment. First and foremost, systems should be updated regularly. The FBI highly encourages patching any known vulnerabilities as quickly as possible against foreign threat actors targeting them. Attackers tend to attack systems with known vulnerabilities rather than trying zero-day exploits, which are much harder to breach. Therefore, this may enable administrators to remain up-to-date with the latest security advisories for their distribution using platforms like LinuxSecurity.com ,giving timely updates. Another good strategy for increased control over resource access on a Linux system is implementing SELinux . SELinux is an extremely powerful, highly granular mandatory access control system that confines access by default based on a defined policy extending well beyond traditional discretionary access control systems. For example, a Web browser has no reason to access an SSH key. SELinux would deny such access in that case, reducing the attack surface area. Network hardening ensures an imposing defense system against the Linux servers. Firewalls must be configured to allow or block incoming and outgoing traffic based on predefined security rules by implementing command-line utilities like iptables and Firewalld. Network intrusion detection systems can be set up to identify suspicious activities running within network traffic where potential intrusions could occur. Snort and Suricata provide real-time traffic analysis, alerting the administrator of impending dangers. Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) are highly advantageous for safely accessing other servers. T hey keep sensitive data encrypted and private. Access controls make it easy to disallow unauthorized access. The principle of least privilege (PoLP) simply requires that a user be granted no more permissions than necessary to perform their job functions. Similarly, user accounts and permissions are reviewed periodically to ensure conformance to security policies, minimizing the danger of insider threats. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) further improves login security by allowing a user who wants to access resources to prove his identity using two or more verification factors. System logs should be monitored regarding events indicating a potential security breach. The administrator must enable log management solutions to make log data collection and analysis easier. Log data could be visualized and analyzed effectively using tools such as the ELK Stack , which comprises Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana.Besides, regular audits of the system configuration settings and users' activities will enable one to find and eliminate security gaps before malicious intrusion may take advantage of them. Various security tools can be added to harden a Linux server. While Linux is a relatively secure operating system from traditional malware, antivirus solutions like ClamAV help find known attacks and prevent them from propagating. With the recent use of containerization with Docker and Kubernetes, it is also paramount to implement container security measures. Routine scanning for vulnerabilities with tools like OpenVAS and Nessus will also help to identify security threats before they are exploited. Examining The Importance of Cyber Hygiene Cyber hygiene is one of the most critical aspects of securing a Linux server. This implies regular user and staff education regarding the latest phishing tactics and social engineering attacks. Training sessions and phishing exercises could power such awareness. Encourage the use of strong, unique passwords and the periodic changing of the passwords. Yes, it is possible to remember complex passwords through password managers. Further, all software, including third-party applications, should be updated and patched against known vulnerabilities to limit attack exposure. This can be automated using Ansible or Puppet so that the potential for human error is minimized and security protocols are followed. Our Final Thoughts on Securing Linux Servers in 2024 Excellent ways to further secure Linux systems are using mechanisms like SELinux, performing strict patch management, monitoring them constantly, controlling access, and educating users. By understanding and addressing current threats, organizations can safeguard their Linux systems against ever-evolving cyber risks, ensuring the integrity and availability of critical assets. . To enhance Linux server security against evolving cyber threats, adopt a multi-layered strategy that includesaccess controls, firewalls, and continuous updates. Linux Security Best Practices, Malware Targeting Linux, Network Hardening Techniques, Access Control Methods. . Brittany Day

Calendar%202 Oct 25, 2024 User Avatar Brittany Day Server Security
79

Explore Cockpit: A Beginner-Friendly Web-Based Server Management Tool

Cockpit is a beginner friendly web-based Linux server manager that lets you manage a remote Linux system through a browser window. With Cockpit, you can view system log entries, monitor network activity, start and stop services, and more! Learn more about this useful app and how to install it on Linux. . Cockpit is a Red Hat sponsored free and open source web-based system management application. It uses a secure shell (SSH) client to access remote servers. Thanks to responsive design, the user interface automatically adapts to different screen sizes which, in turn, facilitates easy access via smartphones. While many Linux sysadmins spend most of their time on the command line, access to a remote system using a tool like a secure shel (SSH) doesn’t always provide the most useful command output. Linux Cockpit provides graphs and easy-to-use forms for viewing performance measures and making changes to your systems. . Panel is an intuitive, cloud-based Linux server administrator for remote management and performance monitoring.. Cockpit, Linux Management Tool, Open Source Server Manager. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 May 18, 2021 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Security Projects
79

Google Introduces USB Keystroke Protection Tool for Linux Users

A day after researchers declared Linux having more vulnerabilities than Windows, Google now makes a free tool to be used by Linux systems to avoid potential USB keystroke attacks. The software would be running background to monitor any suspicious activities from a plugged USB, and notify a user about potential attacks. This was published by Google in its GitHub for Linux PCs. . USB keystroke attacks could be bad, if not worse. Though it’s hard for an attacker to achieve this feat, once a thumb drive is directly plugged into PC, that would give the attacker full admin privileges for exploitation. This was succeeded by the US against Iran’s nuclear plans in the past. Thus, such attacks top have the potential to exploit very badly. Now, Google made software that’s more like the first level of defense, which helps users to sense any potential attacks. As the software, called USB Keystroke Protection aims for alerting the user rather than completely vanishing it. It’s more like a precaution rather than a cure. Yet, it’s useful for at least knowing the incoming threat. . A fresh utility from Google assists Linux users in identifying USB-based keylogging threats while bolstering the overall security of their systems.. USB Keystroke Attack, Linux Protection Tool, Open Source Security. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Mar 12, 2020 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Security Projects
79

Comprehensive Guide to Log Management for IT Compliance and Visibility

System logs generated by servers and other various network apparatus can create data is in vast quantities, and sooner or later, attempts at managing such information in an off-the-cuff fashion is no longer viable.. Consequently, information systems managers are tasked with devising strategies for taming these volumes of log data to remain compliant with company IT policy, and also to gain holistic visibility across all IT systems deployed throughout the organization. With a tad of guidance and a bit of planning, the recipe for log management is actually straightforward, and the rewards are surprisingly favorable. What is log management? First and foremost, a definition of log management is in order. The National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) defines log management in Special Publication SP800-92 as: "the process for generating, transmitting, storing, analyzing, and disposing of computer security log data." As you probably knew that much already, what does log management really entail? Put simply, log management is defining what you need to log, how to log it, and how long to retain the information. This ultimately translates into requirements for hardware, software, and of course, policies. The link for this article located at CSO Online is no longer available. . Data governance officers need to implement robust log data management practices to ensure regulatory adherence and enhance transparency.. Log Management, Data Strategies, IT Compliance, System Logs. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Oct 22, 2010 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Security Projects
77

Top 5 Tools to Boost Performance of Your Linux Operating System

Out of the box, Linux runs just fine for many uses. But if you find yourself needing to ferret out performance problems or tune the kernel for better performance, Linux has more than enough tools to measure and tweak system performance. In this guide, we'll take a look at five of the best utilities to measure system performance and tweak the Linux kernel.. You'll find many, many, many utilities for measuring and improving Linux system performance. The utilities discussed here are chosen because they're widely available, and provide a good scope functionality. Also, I chose to avoid tools that have too steep a learning curve. As an example, SystemTap is a bit more complex than should be covered in an overview article. I left out some of the more basic tools such as ps and top because most Linux users are exposed to them fairly early on. And I didn't try to tackle any application-specific tools. This won't be the last word on system performance and administration on Linux.com, so don't worry. In future tutorials, I'll dive in a bit deeper with specific tools and tuning: but this should be a good starter kit for newer Linux admins. The link for this article located at Linux.com is no longer available. . Linux administrators can enhance system performance with tools like htop, iostat, and vmstat for monitoring and optimizing their environments effectively. Linux Performance Tools, System Monitoring Tools, Tuning Utilities. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Mar 02, 2010 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Server Security
78

AIDE 0.11 Release Features Significant Fixes and Enhanced Support

This is probably the most overdue release in the history of open source software. It has been more than 2 years since the previous release. The most notable changes since version 0.10 are bug fixes, updated automake/autoconf scripts, use snprintf by Mark Martinec if not in C library, support for more (legacy) Unix systems and cygwin, open files with O_NOATIME on supported Linux systems, and added I/ANF/ARF directives. . The link for this article located at Richard van den Berg is no longer available. . The highly anticipated update of AIDE 0.11 introduces several bug fixes, compatibility with older systems, and enhancements in performance.. AIDE, Linux Monitoring, System Security. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Feb 20, 2006 User Avatar LinuxSecurity.com Team Vendors/Products
News Add Esm H340

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/157-should-linux-servers-automatically-install-security-updates?task=poll.vote&format=json
157
radio
0
[{"id":506,"title":"Yes \u2014 critical security patches should install automatically.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":507,"title":"No \u2014 every update should be tested before deployment.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":508,"title":"Only critical vulnerabilities should auto-install.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":509,"title":"I patch when Reddit starts panicking.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":4,"pct":100,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200