Privacy protections "must advance with technology" or privacy will "gradually erode as technology advances." So said the Senate Judiciary Committee -- in 1986, the year that the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) was passed.. On Wednesday, that committee met to discuss overhauling the aging law. At the meeting, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), who chairs the committee, said that "while still a useful tool for our government, today, ECPA is a law that is hampered by conflicting standards that cause confusion for law enforcement, the business community and American consumers alike." The link for this article located at Information Week is no longer available. . Sen. Alex Thompson argues that the aging Consumer Protection Law requires updates to better safeguard citizen rights.. Electronic Privacy Act, data Protection, legislative Reform, privacy Rights. . Anthony Pell
In part of a major Bush Administration lobbying blitz Wednesday, the Department of Justice has released a list of technology-related ramifications if the remaining provisions of the Patriot Act aren't passed by Dec. 31. Lobbying hard for the passage of the remaining portions of the broad-sweeping legislation, the department released a statement Wednesday stating that the federal government would revert back to a "pre-9/11 mode of information sharing…where terrorists and spies can use technology against us." . The DOJ's position statement indicates that investigators will be several steps behind lawbreakers, unable to trace calls of terrorists and spies who frequently change phones to evade surveillance. Internet service providers that voluntarily disclose e-mails threatening an imminent terrorist attack can be sued, the DOJ stated. American companies will not be able to ask law enforcement to help investigate and disrupt cyber attacks, according to the federal statement. The link for this article located at Information Week is no longer available. . The DOJ's position suggests investigators will lag behind lawbreakers, making tracing and investigation difficult.. Cybersecurity, Information Sharing, Technology Legislation. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
It's not surprising that the RIAA would come out in defense of the INDUCE Act from Senator Hatch. They practically wrote the bill themselves. They had hoped to sneak it through without any debate, but a bunch of tech companies have stood up and pointed out how ridiculous this is. Meanwhile, plenty of others are showing what kinds of technology would be banned by the law. . . .. It's not surprising that the RIAA would come out in defense of the INDUCE Act from Senator Hatch. They practically wrote the bill themselves. They had hoped to sneak it through without any debate, but a bunch of tech companies have stood up and pointed out how ridiculous this is. Meanwhile, plenty of others are showing what kinds of technology would be banned by the law. Realizing this might not sail through Congress as smoothly as they had hoped, the RIAA has now gone on the offensive. RIAA head Mitch Bainwol has sent a letter to all 100 Senators defending the bill, and saying that, contrary to the claims of others, it wouldn't overturn the famous Betamax decision (which allowed technologies that could be used for infringement, if they had substantial non-infringing purposes as well). Bainwol claims that "intentional inducement" is a much higher standard than was used in the Betamax ruling. However, as Ernest Miller points out in his INDUCE Act rebuttal, the only reason that's a higher standard is because there was no law against "inducing infringement" when the Betamax decision went to court. . The MPAA stands by the SOPA Bill despite pushback, arguing against accusations regarding its risks and effects on innovation.. RIAA, INDUCE Act, Copyright Law, Technology Legislation, Intellectual Property. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Called the Digital Media Consumers' Rights Act, the amendments are backed by librarians, liberal consumer groups and some technology firms. But they're bitterly opposed by the entertainment industry, including Hollywood, major record labels and the Business Software Alliance. . . .. The United States Congress has taken a step toward revising the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which has attracted extensive criticism over the past six years. A House of Representatives subcommittee have convened for the first hearing devoted to a proposal to defang the DMCA, a 1998 law that broadly restricts bypassing copy-protection technologies used in DVDs, a few music CDs and some software programs. Called the Digital Media Consumers' Rights Act, the amendments are backed by librarians, liberal consumer groups and some technology firms. But they're bitterly opposed by the entertainment industry, including Hollywood, major record labels and the Business Software Alliance. The link for this article located at DVD-Recordable.org is no longer available. . The American legislature is revising the copyright law with support from numerous groups, yet encountering resistance from media companies.. Digital Media Rights, DMCA Revisions, Technology Legislation. . Anthony Pell
A bill before Congress would mandate built-in copy-protection on all digital devices. But even technology experts who really want to protect intellectual property think it's a lousy idea. If you think techies hate Microsoft, try asking them about Hollings -- Sen. Ernest F. "Fritz" Hollings. . .. A bill before Congress would mandate built-in copy-protection on all digital devices. But even technology experts who really want to protect intellectual property think it's a lousy idea. If you think techies hate Microsoft, try asking them about Hollings -- Sen. Ernest F. "Fritz" Hollings , that is, the South Carolina Democrat who finally introduced his long-dreaded copy protection bill into Congress last week. If there's an axis of evil for technology, Hollings has made the list. Hollings' bill, formerly referred to as the SSSCA (Security Systems Standards and Certification Act) but now dubbed the Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act (CBDTPA), would require any device that can "retrieve or access copyrighted works in digital form" to include a federally mandated copy protection system. That covers not just your next iPod or Windows Media Player, but just about every digital device with a screen, a printer, an audio jack, a disk drive, a memory stick, or several input/output devices yet to be invented. Your computer, your camera, your car stereo. The link for this article located at Salon is no longer available. . A suggested legislation might impose copyright safeguards on all electronic devices, encountering criticism from technology specialists.. Digital Rights Management, Copy Protection, Technology Legislation, Privacy Issues. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.