In July 2012, responding to allegations that the video-chat service Skype -- owned by Microsoft -- was changing its protocols to make it possible for the government to eavesdrop on users, Corporate Vice President Mark Gillett took to the company's blog to deny it.. Turns out that wasn't quite true. Or at least he -- or the company's lawyers -- carefully crafted a statement that could be defended as true while completely deceiving the reader. You see, Skype wasn't changing its protocols to make it possible for the government to eavesdrop on users, because the government was already able to eavesdrop on users. The link for this article located at CNN Security is no longer available. . Turns out that wasn't quite true. Or at least he -- or the company's lawyers -- carefully crafted a . responding, allegations, video-chat, service, skype, owned, microsoft. . Dave Wreski
The so-called Zero Trust model for security proposed by Forrester Research earlier this month has revived debate about the way organizations secure their networks.. Zero Trust means end users are no more trusted than outsiders, and that organizations must inspect all traffic, from the outside and on the inside as well. While this concept has stirred Big Brother worries among skeptics, it also resonates with some experts in light of the end user application-borne attacks as well as malicious or careless insiders. But does this user threat trend merit a whole new security model? Most security experts agree that you can't trust your internal network and have to assume you've been compromised, so it's a matter of detecting and stopping breaches before any information is stolen or damage is done. It's just that inspecting all internal traffic can be a tall order -- and maybe overkill. The link for this article located at Dark Reading is no longer available. . The concept of Zero Trust dictates that every user is scrutinized in the same way as external entities, emphasizing rigorous examination of all data flows.. Zero Trust Security, Network Inspection, End User Threats, Security Models. . Anthony Pell
Google is pushing full steam ahead with their office strategy, and their hope is to convince a lot of individuals and businesses to trust Google enough to store their documents on Google's servers instead of their own computers, or servers under their control. The fact that unauthorized document access is a simple password guess or government "request" away already works against them. But the steady stream of minor security incidents we've seen (many very recently) can also hurt Google in the long run. Running applications for businesses is serious stuff, and Google needs to be diligent about security. . The link for this article located at TechCrunch is no longer available. . Google's security missteps can erode user trust, leading individuals and businesses to reconsider their cloud data storage options amid growing competition.. Google Security, Cloud Storage Risks, User Trust Issues, Data Privacy, Business Application Security. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Another obstacle to Google's ascendancy is the company's own privacy and usage policies: "All this assumes that people will trust Google with their data, of course. That's yet to be proven," Sullivan said. Even though the Gmail is not yet available, "consumer watchdogs are attacking it as a creepy invasion of privacy that threatens to set a troubling precedent," the AP wrote. Critics are pressuring Google to "drop its plans to electronically scan e-mail content so it can distribute relevant ads alongside incoming messages." Another policy being criticized permits Google to retain copies of people's e-mails even after the users' close their accounts. . . .. Another obstacle to Google's ascendancy is the company's own privacy and usage policies: "All this assumes that people will trust Google with their data, of course. That's yet to be proven," Sullivan said. Even though the Gmail is not yet available, "consumer watchdogs are attacking it as a creepy invasion of privacy that threatens to set a troubling precedent," the AP wrote. Critics are pressuring Google to "drop its plans to electronically scan e-mail content so it can distribute relevant ads alongside incoming messages." Another policy being criticized permits Google to retain copies of people's e-mails even after the users' close their accounts. Gartner recommended that enterprises avoid using Gmail for the same reason Gartner recommends enterprises avoid all web-based e-mail services: the service isn't under the enterprise's control. "Enterprises should steer clear of Gmail, and all other free Web-based mail services, the Gartner analysts added, because they lack the kind of management tools and security demanded by business." John Gilmore, co-founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation warned that Google's proposed Gmail terms of service don't just "restate the law. They sweep it aside.... You agree to accept any future changes to the terms or policies. Any. If you don't agree NOW to all future changes, you can't ever use the service, even now underthe current terms." Google can investigate your use of the service and access and disclose your information in compliance with any government request, no subpoena or court order necessary, Gilmore said. Users, meanwhile, are forbidden from extracting copies of their own e-mail from the service, he said. The link for this article located at linuxpipeline.com is no longer available. . Tech giants encounter hurdles in consumer confidence and data security, with experts cautioning against the use of Google Docs for enterprise solutions.. Privacy Policies, Data Security, Cloud Solutions, Enterprise Email, Google Gmail. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
U.S. CITIZENS ARE increasingly worried about their privacy while surfing online and would like Internet privacy guarantees, even though they are currently doing little themselves to protect their Internet identities, according to a study released on Sunday by the nonprofit Pew . . . . U.S. CITIZENS ARE increasingly worried about their privacy while surfing online and would like Internet privacy guarantees, even though they are currently doing little themselves to protect their Internet identities, according to a study released on Sunday by the nonprofit Pew Internet & American Life Project, of Washington. The survey, conducted via telephone and e-mail interviews from May 19 to June 21, asked 2,117 Americans -- 1,017 of whom are Internet users -- their views on trust and privacy online, the organization said in a statement. The link for this article located at InfoWorld is no longer available. . U.S. CITIZENS ARE increasingly worried about their privacy while surfing online and would like Inter. citizens, increasingly, worried, about, their, privacy, while, surfing, online, would. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.