Audit Linux privileges now to limit compromise, escalation, and system-wide damage. Review Linux Privileges×
Google recognizes that before you can understand something, you need to measure it, and is bringing a way to measure security errors across open-source software programs. . Business author and expert, H. James Harrington, once said, "If you can't measure something, you can't understand it. If you can't understand it, you can't control it. If you can't control it, you can't improve it." He was right. And Google is following this advice by introducing a new way to strengthen open-source security by introducing a vulnerability interchange schema for describing vulnerabilities across open-source ecosystems. That's very important. One low-level problem is that there are many security vulnerability databases, there's no standard interchange format. If you want to aggregate information from multiple databases you must handle each one completely separately. That's a real waste of time and energy. At the very least you must create parsers for each database format to merge their data. All this makes systematic tracking of dependencies and collaboration between vulnerability databases much harder than it should be. . The latest framework introduced by Google aims to improve our approach to identifying and analyzing vulnerabilities in open-source applications.. Open Source Safety,Vulnerability Tracking,Security Measurement,Data Standards,Software Security. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
A joint system for reporting and grading security vulnerabilities is going to be launched today. With an eye to guiding companies on which software problems to patch first, Cisco, Symantec and Qualys plan to launch a joint grading system for security vulnerabilities. The ratings will consist of three numbers, Gerhard Eschelbeck, the chief technology officer at security information provider Qualys said on Tuesday. The first will be a baseline estimate of the severity of the flaw. The second will rate the bug depending on how long it has been around, and therefore how likely it is that companies have patched against it. . The third will measure the threat a vulnerability poses to a specific corporate network. Each will take five or six factors into account for the measurement. The companies plan to announce the first version of the system on Thursday, Eschelbeck said. They are proposing that vulnerability trackers such as BugTraq use the approach to label the severity of new software bugs. Businesses can take the ratings to calculate the level of risk on their own network, to generate a single grade, depending on factors such as how reliant they are on the affected software. "There are three numbers, but customers will deal with a specific final number," he said. "You can see right out of the get-go how vulnerable you are." The launch, which will be made at the RSA Conference in San Francisco this week, is the fruit of a partnership of Redwood Shores, California-based Qualys, networking giant Cisco -- which has recently announced a revamp of its security product line -- and security company Symantec. It is designed to provide the first systematic grading of flaws that can be used by companies to assess the potential damage to their vulnerable systems and to prioritise patching. The link for this article located at zdnet.co.uk is no longer available. . A collaborative effort between IBM, McAfee, and Rapid7 seeks to improve the evaluation and classification of cybersecurity flaws.. SecurityGrading System, Vulnerability Tracking, Patching Guidance. . Brittany Day
With network device vulnerabilities being discovered all the time, should you be monitoring patch management yourself, or is outsourcing the best option? If the IT industry was subject to the same restrictions as the car industry, the number of equipment recalls . . . . With network device vulnerabilities being discovered all the time, should you be monitoring patch management yourself, or is outsourcing the best option? If the IT industry was subject to the same restrictions as the car industry, the number of equipment recalls would be so huge that many companies would go out of business. Bugs are an inevitable problem in a sector where companies are driven by shareholders to rush out equipment before it is ready. From a security perspective, this presents users with a huge problem. Empirical evidence suggests that the average device - whether it is a perimeter network resource such as a firewall or router, or a core device such as a server - has more holes in it than a piece of Gruyere. The link for this article located at ComputerWeekly.co.uk is no longer available. . Enhancing network security requires effective strategies in patch management and vulnerability tracking. Explore methods like automated patch deployment and regular scans. Network Security, Patch Management, Vulnerability Tracking, Device Management. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.