Most Americans believe the government should do more to make the Internet safe, but they don't trust the federal institutions that are largely responsible for creating and enforcing laws online, a new industry survey says. . People who were questioned expressed concerns over threats from identity theft, computer viruses and unwanted 'spam' e-mails. But they held low opinions toward Congress and the Federal Trade Commission, which protects consumers against Internet fraud. 'A lot of times, people get us confused with other agencies,' said Lee Peeler, deputy director for the consumer protection bureau at the FTC, which has sued people accused of sending spam and spyware. The FBI scored more favorably among Internet users in the survey but still lower than technology companies, such as Microsoft Corp. and Dell Inc. The phone survey of 1,003 likely voters was funded by the Washington-based Cyber Security Industry Alliance, a trade group that has lobbied the Bush administration to pay more attention to Internet security. 'There are some mixed signals here,' said Paul Kurtz, the group's executive director and a former White House cybersecurity official. 'There is definitely a desire to see government provide more leadership, but there is some anxiety about what ultimately might come out.' The link for this article located at Chicago Sun-Times is no longer available. . People who were questioned expressed concerns over threats from identity theft, computer viruses and. americans, believe, government, should, internet, don't, trust. . Brittany Day
One has to wonder how the anti-virus industry sleeps well at night. On one hand, it purports to serve the world by defending our computers and networks from any number of electronic critters and malicious code. On the other hand, sometimes its "cure" is worse than the problem its companies and products allegedly treat. Add to that a decades-old concern over business, market share, and publicity, and you have all the ingredients for a confused industry, product, and service. This situation regularly benefits the antivirus software industry and victimizes its customers. . . .. One has to wonder how the anti-virus industry sleeps well at night. On one hand, it purports to serve the world by defending our computers and networks from any number of electronic critters and malicious code. On the other hand, sometimes its "cure" is worse than the problem its companies and products allegedly treat. Add to that a decades-old concern over business, market share, and publicity, and you have all the ingredients for a confused industry, product, and service. This situation regularly benefits the antivirus software industry and victimizes its customers. Let's start with malicious code outbreaks in general. Unlike hurricanes and tsunamis, there is no standard way of naming malicious code -- and thus is the greatest problem facing the antivirus industry. Gone are the days when simple names like "Jerusalem", "Michaelangelo" and "Stoned" were accepted and used by all antivirus vendors and their products. Today, what one company calls "Worm_Minmail.R" another calls "W32.Novarg" -- someone else calls it "MyDoom.A@m" and another may classify the same thing as "W32/MyDoom." What is needed is a return to industry-wide nomenclature for malicious code that can be used by all vendors in describing their products and making the reporting, analysis, and resolution of such outbreaks easier and more productive for customers and researchers alike. Then there's the matter of marketing and mindshare. First and foremost, antivirus vendors are inbusiness to make money, and it behooves them to capitalize on as much free publicity as they can. Thus, with each new outbreak we see vendors stumbling all over themselves to be the "first to detect and defend" against the latest malicious code and probably explains why there's no longer a standard outbreak naming scheme after nearly two decades. From press releases to interviews on television, radio, and newspapers, antivirus industry executives race to establish their companies and products as the most vigilant and capable on the market, an activity often made more amusing when backed by questionable, if not fabricated, statistics and predicted damage assessments (usually in the billions of dollars) from each outbreak -- and almost always followed by a pitch espousing the cost-effective security that only their products provide. The link for this article located at net-security.org is no longer available. . The anti-virus sector, while crucial for user safety, often undermines its own security promises through fear tactics, jargon, and opaque pricing practices. Anti-virus Issues, Malicious Code, Consumer Trust, Security Practices. . Anthony Pell
Privacy is an issue that uniquely plagues the online industry. Consumers don't seem to mind that banks sell their balance information, or that their in-store transactions, catalogue purchases, and magazine subscriptions are routinely sold to direct marketers. Or that security cameras . . . . Privacy is an issue that uniquely plagues the online industry. Consumers don't seem to mind that banks sell their balance information, or that their in-store transactions, catalogue purchases, and magazine subscriptions are routinely sold to direct marketers. Or that security cameras record their comings and goings. For years, customers of Radio Shack freely gave up their home addresses and phone numbers just to buy some batteries. I suspect there is more to fear in how offline personal credit records are compiled than in whether cookies are tracking you when you click on Internet ads, but the public remains convinced there is something, well sinister, about the collection and use of online data ... or do they? Consumers rightfully complain about the intrusiveness of pop-up and pop-under ads and the incredible amount of irrelevant spam that overflows their in-boxes, and suspect that they might become targets when they complete online registration forms, sweepstakes, e-commerce orders, or newsletter sign-ups with their e-mail addresses. These complaints are regularly offered and portrayed in the press and by privacy pundits as evidence of significant consumer concerns about violations of their privacy. The link for this article located at EditorAndPublisher is no longer available. . Privacy is an issue that uniquely plagues the online industry. Consumers don't seem to mind that ban. privacy, uniquely, plagues, online, industry, consumers, don't. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Secure site seals handed out to sites by certificate authorities and lock icons shown by browsers can often mislead consumers into believing that a site is more secure than it actually is, according to the latest Netcraft Web Server Survey.. . .. Secure site seals handed out to sites by certificate authorities and lock icons shown by browsers can often mislead consumers into believing that a site is more secure than it actually is, according to the latest Netcraft Web Server Survey. The survey said a recent dialogue between the two leading certificate authorities - Verisign and Geotrust has highlighted the fact that though the site seal and browser lock may look reassuring, there was no assurance at all that the site is not vulnerable to some well known exploit, and typically many are. It said the discovery of remote vulnerabilities in Microsoft Commerce Server and Microsoft-IIS published last month, had left many commerce and financial sites open to attack, and there was often no clear cut way in which a site's prospective customers can legally determine whether their transactions and data were likely to be safe or not. Due to these factors, Netcraft said it was likely that payment mechanisms on the Internet would increasingly become centralised. The survey also showed that IIS has made a gain of three percent in number of sites hosted on the Net due to the fact that register.com putting a Windows-based front end back in place on their domain parking system. It said register.com had alternated recently between a Windows and Linux front end, and this caused a fluctuation when it changed. All of article. . In today's digital landscape, website security is vital, yet consumers often misinterpret site seals as definitive proof of safety, which can be misleading and risky. Secure Site Seals, Consumer Protection, Exploit Risks, Web Security Standards. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Privacy efforts are intended to project an image of trust to consumers worried about the loss of their privacy, to dissuade lawmakers from tightening regulations, to prevent costly courtroom battles, and to avoid public relations nightmares while encouraging online transactions. IT . . . . Privacy efforts are intended to project an image of trust to consumers worried about the loss of their privacy, to dissuade lawmakers from tightening regulations, to prevent costly courtroom battles, and to avoid public relations nightmares while encouraging online transactions. IT data privacy efforts are being stepped up in the financial services and health care fields, which are being prodded by new laws. Net companies have plenty of incentive to regulate themselves now rather than wait to see what will emerge from the scores of privacy-related bills that have been introduced in both Congress and state legislatures. Companies doing business online would pay from $9 billion to $36 billion modifying their Web sites to comply with proposed privacy laws, according to a study released May 8 which was underwritten by the Association for Competitive Technology, a Washington-based lobbying organization backed by Microsoft. The link for this article located at InfoWorld is no longer available. . Privacy efforts are intended to project an image of trust to consumers worried about the loss of the. privacy, efforts, intended, project, image, trust, consumers, worried, about. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Privacy protections will increasingly be seen as a way to add value and build brand loyalty, business leaders said Tuesday. Consumers want more customized services for promoting products and services they are interested in, said John Kamp, counsel for the CPExchange . . . . Privacy protections will increasingly be seen as a way to add value and build brand loyalty, business leaders said Tuesday. Consumers want more customized services for promoting products and services they are interested in, said John Kamp, counsel for the CPExchange Network, made up of 90 businesses that are developing an open standard for data privacy. They also want information about them protected. "As consumers demand privacy transparency, the successful company will do that," he told a conference at the Federal Trade Commission examining how companies that merge and exchange detailed consumer information observe privacy. The link for this article located at TechWeb is no longer available. . Privacy protections will increasingly be seen as a way to add value and build brand loyalty, busines. privacy, protections, increasingly, value, build, brand, loyalty, busines. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Move over, CEO, CIO, and COO. Your titles are passe compared to the newest position in high demand from corporate headhunters -- Chief Privacy Officer. With consumers increasingly concerned about their privacy and new technology able to track Internet users . . . . Move over, CEO, CIO, and COO. Your titles are passe compared to the newest position in high demand from corporate headhunters -- Chief Privacy Officer. With consumers increasingly concerned about their privacy and new technology able to track Internet users click by click, companies are rapidly hiring privacy officers and giving them broad powers to set policies that protect consumers from invasion and companies from public relations nightmares. . Move over, CEO, CIO, and COO. Your titles are passe compared to the newest position in high demand f. titles, passe, compared, newest, position, demand. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.