New York City lawmakers are not advocating an outright ban of facial recognition technology, but say that regulation is necessary to know how police and business owners are using the software. What is your opinion on this? We'd love to hear your thoughts. Learn more in a great Security Today article: . Spurred by the use of facial recognition software in Madison Square Garden, new legislation proposed by the New York City Council could bring regulation of the technology to the country’s largest metropolitan area. Interestingly, lawmakers in the city are taking a different approach to facial recognition than their counterparts in three California cities and one Massachusetts town, where the use of the software by police and public agencies is now banned. New York City Councilman Ritchie Torres, who introduced a bill that would require businesses to notify customers that they are using facial recognition, said he is cautioning legislators to “tread carefully rather than going too far” by banning it. The link for this article located at Security Today is no longer available. . Prompted by advanced facial recognition technology within the confines of Madison Square Garden, lawmakers are advocating for stricter regulations in New York City.. Facial Recognition, New York City, Privacy Laws, Technology Regulation. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Having failed to pass any meaningful Internet privacy legislation last year even with a resounding mandate from most voters, Congress cannot afford to miss another opportunity to enact online privacy laws this year, lest the Internet be gridlocked by a myriad . . . . Having failed to pass any meaningful Internet privacy legislation last year even with a resounding mandate from most voters, Congress cannot afford to miss another opportunity to enact online privacy laws this year, lest the Internet be gridlocked by a myriad of conflicting and burdensome regulations at the state and local level, a pair of influential lawmakers said. "Our first call is to harmonize and perhaps even federally preempt statutes and actions so that interstate commerce will not be impeded in this new e-commerce world," said incoming House Commerce Committee Chairman W. J. "Billy" Tauzin, R-La., at a conference today sponsored by TechNet, a tech CEO-driven lobbying group. Tauzin emphasized that a few "bad actors" that refuse to play by the rules or work to earn the industry's seal of approval should not deter Congress from enacting laws that let industry take the lead. Instead, he advocated a "highly targeted approach" to privacy legislation that would include provisions to "incentivize" industry self-regulation. The link for this article located at ComputerUser is no longer available. . As lawmakers navigate the complexities of digital privacy, could 2023 usher in substantial changes to online data protection policies?. Internet Privacy Laws, E-Commerce Policy, Privacy Protection. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
A pair of House lawmakers on Wednesday introduced legislation that would exempt private companies from liability for sharing information with the federal government and each other on ways to beef up computer security. . . .. A pair of House lawmakers on Wednesday introduced legislation that would exempt private companies from liability for sharing information with the federal government and each other on ways to beef up computer security. The link for this article located at Newsbytes.com is no longer available. . The House of Representatives has proposed a bill to legally protect businesses sharing cybersecurity info to enhance collective defenses against digital threats. Cybersecurity Legislation, Info Sharing, Threat Management. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.