A new bill introduced by Sens. Chris Coons and Mike Lee would prevent “abuse” of facial recognition technology by federal authorities. Learn more in this Security Today article: . Following ongoing scrutiny of the use of facial recognition technology by police and the government, two senators have introduced a bill requiring federal law enforcement to obtain a warrant before using the software to conduct public surveillance. Sens. Chris Coons (D-Delaware) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) introduced The Facial Recognition Technology Warrant Act on Nov. 14 as part of an effort to regulate how authorities can use the tool, which has been criticized as invasive and less accurate when identifying people of color and women. In a statement, Coons and Lee said that facial recognition can be a valuable tool for police but could “violate the privacy of individual Americans” if used improperly. While introducing the bill, Lee said that Americans deserve protection from “facial recognition abuse.” The link for this article located at Security Today is no longer available. . Legislation requires government entities to obtain judicial authorization before employing biometric identification, protecting individual privacy.. Facial Recognition, Federal Law, Technology Regulation, Privacy Protection, Warrant Requirement. . Brittany Day
Backed by a number of tech companies, California is eyeing state legislation to protect Relevant Products/Services its citizens from warrantless government surveillance of e-mails, text messages and cellphone communications. The proposed legislation is being backed by state senators Mark Leno, a Democrat, and Joel Anderson, a Republican. . The proposal, Senate Bill 178, is also known as the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act. It would require law enforcement officials to first obtain warrants before accessing Californians' digital Relevant Products/Services information or communications. . The proposal, Senate Bill 178, is also known as the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act. backed, number, companies, california, eyeing, state, legislation, protect, relevant. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
If the feds want to spy on your home using whizzy tech gadgets, they'd better get a warrant first, the Supreme Court said on Monday. In an important 5-4 ruling that extends privacy's shield to radiation not visible to the human . . . . If the feds want to spy on your home using whizzy tech gadgets, they'd better get a warrant first, the Supreme Court said on Monday. In an important 5-4 ruling that extends privacy's shield to radiation not visible to the human eye, the court said federal agents should have obtained a warrant before using an infrared imaging device to snoop on Danny Lee Kyllo, an Oregon man they later arrested for growing marijuana. The decision, written by conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, said even though the law has long allowed police to peer at homes through their naked eyes, enhanced cameras and similar devices in law enforcement hands "would leave the homeowner at the mercy of advancing technology -- including imaging technology that could discern all human activity in the home." The link for this article located at Wired is no longer available. . High Court decision highlights the necessity of obtaining warrants prior to utilizing sophisticated technology for surveillance purposes.. Privacy Ruling, Surveillance Laws, Infrared Imaging. . Anthony Pell
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.