Overly broad permissions can turn one compromised account into a much larger security problem. Learn how to reduce unnecessary access, review privileges, and apply least privilege across modern Linux systems. Review Linux Privileges×
Stay Ahead With Linux Security Features
identity management security tactics For years, we secured our Linux infrastructure by building walls: VPCs, security groups, and hardened SSH configurations. We treated the cloud like a virtual data center, assuming that if we kept the "bad guys" out of the network, our workloads were safe. . That model is no longer sufficient. Today, one of the most common paths from an initial compromise to a major cloud breach is the identity assigned to your Linux workload. When an attacker gains code execution on a Linux instance—through a...
Jul 17, 2026
security practices patch management Most of us don't hear about a kernel vulnerability until a CVE lands in our inbox or the vulnerability scanner starts complaining. By then, the patch isn't new anymore. Kernel developers may have been passing it around for review, arguing over the implementation, or revising it for days before anyone outside that community noticed it. None of those discussions are secret. They're sitting in mailing list archives, Git commits, and patch reviews where they've been the whole time. The strange...
Jul 14, 2026
Linux security cyber attacks Every Linux server in your fleet produces thousands of events every minute. From journald logs and auditd records to kernel-level eBPF hooks, your systems are constantly talking. Most of that noise is just the mundane churn of system services, CI/CD runners, or routine administrative automation. But among that noise, an attacker might be establishing a foothold, moving laterally, or setting up persistence. The challenge for any security team is: how do you separate the routine from the...
Jul 13, 2026
open-source infrastructure risk Security scanners flag exposed API keys in public repositories every day. The initial response is usually predictable: delete the commit, revoke the credential, and move on. That’s a mistake. . In a real Linux environment, an API key never stays in one place. By the time it hits a public repo, it’s already everywhere. It’s in the CI/CD pipeline. It’s in your container registry. It’s in the build logs. It’s in the backups. Git makes this worse because the history never dies. Deleting a file in...
Jul 11, 2026
open-source rootkit Most of us think of Linux rootkits as ancient history—the stuff of 90s hacking forums and clunky malware that would crash your system if you looked at it the wrong way. But if you think they’ve gone away, you’re mistaken. They’ve just gotten smarter. . Modern attackers aren't using the noisy tools of the past. Today’s threats are surgical. Many of today’s most advanced Linux rootkits operate at the kernel level or abuse legitimate system features to blend in with normal traffic. They’re...
Jul 09, 2026
Refine features
X Clear Filters
Get the latest News and Insights
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.
Community Poll
Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?
Loading...
Explore Latest Linux Security features
We found -3 articles for you...
102
application securitycode analysismigration.NET Core Migration Challenges: Enhance Security with Linux Integration
As organizations look to modernize their applications and increase performance, .NET Core can be a pivotal shift from the .NET Framework. It is the perfect platform to build secure, scalable, and future-ready solutions, with a growing emphasis on open-source technologies and cross-platform compatibility. In this article, we explore the migration process and how using Linux and open source can make it more secure and efficient before and after the migration. . Advantages of .NET Core over .NET Framework .NET Core is an open-source, cross-platform framework designed for cross-platform development to address .NET Framework limitations. Compared to .NET Framework, which is only intended to run on Windows, .NET Core permits applications to be deployed into Linux and macOS, making it an excellent choice for cloud-based web hosting. Its flexibility also works well for companies looking for a cheaper hosting option, such as cloud-based web hosting, and more flexible working. Additionally, the .NET Core is open source and has evolved rapidly among the participants of the .NET developer community, contributing to innovation and security enhancements. From a security point of view, .NET Core brings a lot of advantages. Updates and modularity mean that developers have a vehicle by which to quickly and easily remediate vulnerabilities. One of the benefits is that it makes it possible to run .NET Core-hosted apps on Linux with the security benefits that Linux offers out of the box. The ability to provide this combination of adaptability, cross-platform development, and security makes .NET Core an enterprise-worthy solution for modernizing technology. Migration to .NET Core – Hard Challenges To migrate from .NET framework to .NET core comes with its challenges. Many applications built in .NET Framework depend on legacy libraries and APIs that: They are not compatible with .NET Core. They may not be accessible via .NET Core packages. They need to be manually importedfor use. Refactoring or replacing dated components is necessary, so we need to plan accordingly. Furthermore, during the migration, organizations also have to guarantee that their applications continue to meet security technical implementation guides to meet security and compliance requirements. Another huge challenge is switching workloads to platforms unfamiliar to some teams. Although Linux's security and performance are unique, adopting it requires a change in their approach. Understanding Linux-based monitoring , logging, and security tools that administrators use is essential for leaders. The learning curve for understanding Linux can be steep in the beginning, but the payoff in the long run is well worth it. Making the Business Case for Linux and Open Source in the Migration Process Clicking into .NET Core allows an organization to integrate Linux and open source technology within its ecosystem. .NET Core apps run stably and performantly on Linux, which has built-in security features like SELinux, AppArmor, and a pumped-up network configuration. Deploying applications on Linux, establishing backup Linux systems , and combining containerization help organizations break away from proprietary systems and embrace cloud-based web hosting for improved infrastructure security. The migration process would not be as successful without open-source tools. There are plenty of utilities, including containerization tools, available to developers to make refactoring, testing, or deployment of your applications a breeze. One of the attributes of containers is their role in containerization ( Docker in particular), providing isolated .NET Core applications and their dependencies where performance can remain consistent. In addition, open-source CI/CD pipelines such as Jenkins or GitHub Actions allow for automated testing and deployment, and migrated applications are tested and deployed with quality standards to end up in production. Another equally important advantage of thisopen-source collaboration is that developers have access to extensive documentation, forums, and code samples to help expedite the migration process. This collaboration also makes security patches, updates, and cross-platform development more readily available, which helps eliminate an even larger security vulnerability—not realizing that there’s an issue in the first place. Open source development is transparent, allowing the trust and reliability necessary for mission-critical applications. Improving Security During And After Migration The migration from .NET Framework to .NET Core is of primary importance for security. Organizations have to practice ahead to identify and control potential risks. The process starts with a very good analysis of existing applications, their dependencies, and their vulnerabilities. Practical code analysis tools will help determine where code needs to be changed to support .NET Core while closing security holes introduced by unknown sources. After migration, the choice of Linux as a security hosting platform only gets better. It provides exceptional control over system configuration , especially when following a technical security implementation guide. Since access controls can be enforced and the behavior of applications can be monitored admirably, Linux is a sound, minimally privileged system, making it ideal for running backup Linux environments securely. Besides, to provide additional layers of protection against cyber threats, the use of open-source security tools, including intrusion detection systems and audit frameworks, can be beneficial. .NET Core applications need regular updates and maintenance to maintain their security status. Because .NET Core is a modular framework, updates to a particular component don’t mean that the entire application stops working, reducing downtime and ensuring the quick rollout of security patches. To stay ahead of emerging threats, organizations should create a robust patch management process and ensure they havebackup Linux systems to safeguard data. Strengthen Your .NET Core Security Posture. A move from .NET Framework to .NET Core offers organizations the chance to embrace an open-source approach, shore up security, and gain cross-platform compatibility. By exploiting the power of Linux, cross-platform development, and an abundant ecosystem of open-source tools , businesses can navigate migration challenges and achieve deeper levels of efficiency and innovation. Getting here requires good planning, but dedication to continuous improvement has its benefits. Organizations that build with .NET Core are also well-positioned to build resilient, scalable, and secure applications for the future. Maintaining the security of .NET Core projects is critical to protecting user data and applications from potential threats. By following open-source best practices for security, you can significantly decrease vulnerabilities and safeguard systems more effectively. Such practices include securing dependencies, enforcing HTTPS, managing configurations securely, and implementing robust authentication and authorization mechanisms. Additionally, organizations should conduct regular static code analysis, perform audits and penetration tests to identify security flaws and provide comprehensive logging and monitoring capabilities. Audits and pentests will help identify vulnerabilities and can identify and exploit them effectively. As you move forward, pay particular attention to taking these proactive measures to increase the security of your .NET Core apps: Regularly Update Dependencies : Use tools such as NuGet or Snyk to keep dependencies up-to-date, adhere to a security technical implementation guide , and do not originate from unknown sources. Also, implement HTTPS using Let's Encrypt . Establish HTTPS in Transit : Secure your data while transiting using migration towards HTTPS, ensuring its protection in transit by migrating all HTTPS-enabled sites using Let's Encrypt's services for SSL/TLScertificates. Secret Management : Securely store sensitive information using Azure Key Vault , AWS Secrets Manager , or HashiCorp Vault , as well as environment variables for sensitive data storage. Deploy Security Frameworks : Integrate effective authentication and authorization frameworks such as ASP.NET Core Identity, IdentityServer4, or Azure AD B2C for robust user authorization and authentication processes. Automate Code Analysis : Integrating code analysis tools like SonarQube and GitHub CodeQL into your CI/CD pipeline will help you identify issues early and detect potential threats. Enable Robust Logging and Monitoring : For comprehensive logging, consider Serilog, NLog, or cloud services such as Azure Monitor. Prometheus or Grafana may provide useful monitoring features to monitor application performance and potential security concerns. Conduct Regular Security Audits and Penetration Tests : Regular security audits and penetration tests using tools like OWASP ZAP are crucial for continuously evaluating and enhancing your security posture. By implementing these best practices and making optimal use of open-source tools, you can establish an efficient security framework for your .NET Core projects. By taking proactive steps like these, using code analysis tools, avoiding unknown sources, and leveraging open-source tools efficiently, you will significantly lower the risk of exploiting applications used by all users and ensure their safety and reliability for all. . Explore the .NET Core migration challenges and uncover how to enhance security with Linux integration effectively.. organizations, modernize, their, applications, increase, performance. . MaK Ulac
Jan 17, 2025
•
102
open sourceenterprise securitythreat intelligenceCloud-Native Security Insights: Addressing Challenges with Uptycs
Cloud and container adoption is on the rise, as organizations are increasingly recognizing the potential for rapid growth and evolution that cloud-based infrastructure offers. That being said, along with these advantages comes significant security challenges. . The modern cloud-native attack surface is complex and difficult to secure with many “moving pieces” including endpoints, servers, containers and cloud providers. This makes integrating Threat Intelligence data gathered from all of these surfaces and evaluating potential security and compliance risks and active threats no easy task. Not only is risk harder to identify and evaluate in cloud and container environments, security vulnerabilities, malware and other threats that are also easier to inadvertently inherit from common layers and shared components frequently used in container builds. To better understand the modern cloud-native attack surface and what is required to close security and observability gaps across cloud-native infrastructure, LinuxSecurity researchers had the privilege of speaking with Ryan Mack, Director of Engineering at Uptycs, a leading open source cloud-native security analytics provider, to discuss the challenges organizations face and how to enhance and simplify cloud-native security and observability for the enterprise. LinuxSecurity: How do you feel that the extensive adoption of containerization has impacted the digital threat landscape? Ryan Mack: Containerization, like every evolution in the way software is developed and deployed, trades some conveniences and security benefits for others. On the development side, building container images speeds development by making it much easier to include common layers and shared components. This also makes it easier to inadvertently inherit security vulnerabilities or even malware - commonly coin miners - that have been included in commonly used images on public image repositories. On the deployment side, short-lived containers have dramatically improved the abilityto scale to sudden increases in load and provide security benefits by making deployments more immutable. This can present a challenge for heavy weight endpoint security software that don't scale down well into low memory micro VMs or don't make it easy to understand a complex and potentially high churn set of running containers. LS: What is the most significant challenge that Uptycs helps enterprises overcome? What differentiates your products from other security analytics platforms available for the enterprise? RM: To be honest this varies widely depending on the enterprise. This can range from just providing a tool to run queries against their corporate assets and cloud infrastructure, historic data collection for after-the-fact security analysis, to our full set of compliance monitoring, real time threat detection, remediation, and vulnerability scanning. Every security analytics vendor that ingests data from different sources needs to solve the problem of normalization and correlation to perform analysis. Uptycs tackles this problem by extending the osquery concept of SQL-driven analytics. We’ve developed open-source extensions to osquery to expand the types of telemetry gathered and normalized into SQL tables for simpler real-time event correlation and ad hoc querying. With this analysis backend, we can quickly answer different types of questions such as “Are we seeing exploit attempts for this particular CVE, and have these bad actors been doing anything else in our network?” and “What is the compliance posture of our Linux server fleet against the CIS Benchmarks?” LS: Although the platform itself is not an open-source tool, Uptycs has built on various open-source projects spearheaded by Facebook and Apache to engineer its Uptycs Security Analytics Platform. In your opinion, how does your use of Open Source benefit your engineers and your customers? More specifically, how does your use of Open Source impact the level of security that your customers experience? RM: Therapid adoption and evolution of cloud-based infrastructure requires that cloud-native Security Analytics innovate and adapt quickly. Open source software provides scalable, battle tested foundations that allow us to focus on the unique requirements of our product instead of reinventing common components. Our ability to rapidly adapt to enterprises' changing requirements and an ever-evolving threat landscape is in no small part due to being able to build on top of robust open source solutions . LS: How do you anticipate the cloud-native attack surface changing and evolving in coming years? RM: The key ongoing trend of the last couple of decades has been the shift from a few big servers, to small server scale-out, to virtual machines, containers, and now serverless computing with AWS Lambda and Fargate. Each step has shifted the operational complexity from things we are in direct control of to things we manage indirectly through the configuration of our cloud provider, container orchestration framework, or service mesh. This trend is certainly going to persist foing forward. Security professionals need to understand how dramatically their attack surfaces will change in the coming years. They need to anticipate these changes because attackers will be looking to exploit gaps in visibility and unmitigated risk in these new environments. New problems demand new solutions, and Uptycs is positioned well to help organizations tackle these emerging security challenges with scalable, integrated technology built on a secure, community-powered open-source foundation. Have a thought to share or another open-source security tool you’d like us to cover? Connect with us on Twitter and let us know! . The modern cloud-native attack surface is complex and difficult to secure with many “moving pieces. cloud, container, adoption, organizations, increasingly, recognizing, poten. . Brittany Day
Oct 26, 2021
•
Get the latest News and Insights
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.
Community Poll
Should Linux servers automatically install security updates?
Search Topics
Powered By
Linux Security - Your source for Top Linux News, Advisories, HOWTOs and Feature Releases
QUICK LINKS
subscribe to newsletters!
Like staying secure? So do we.
Sign up for updates, tips, and alerts!