Debian: DSA-2342-1: iceape security update

    Date09 Nov 2011
    CategoryDebian
    51
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several vulnerabilities have been found in the Iceape internet suite, an unbranded version of Seamonkey: CVE-2011-3647
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2342-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    November 09, 2011                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : iceape
    Vulnerability  : several
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2011-3647 CVE-2011-3648 CVE-2011-3650 
    
    Several vulnerabilities have been found in the Iceape internet suite, an
    unbranded version of Seamonkey:
    
    CVE-2011-3647
    
       "moz_bug_r_a4" discovered a privilege escalation vulnerability in
       addon handling.    
    
    CVE-2011-3648
    
       Yosuke Hasegawa discovered that incorrect handling of Shift-JIS 
       encodings could lead to cross-site scripting.
    
    CVE-2011-3650
    
       Marc Schoenefeld discovered that profiling the Javascript code
       could lead to memory corruption.
    
    The oldstable distribution (lenny) is not affected. The iceape package only
    provides the XPCOM code.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.0.11-9.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.0.14-9.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your iceape packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.