Debian: DSA-2871-1: wireshark security update

    Date10 Mar 2014
    CategoryDebian
    47
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in Wireshark: CVE-2014-2281
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2871-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    March 10, 2014                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : wireshark
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-2281 CVE-2014-2283 CVE-2014-2299
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in Wireshark:
    
    CVE-2014-2281
    
        Moshe Kaplan discovered that the NFS dissector could be crashed,
        resulting in denial of service.
    
    CVE-2014-2283
    
        It was discovered that the RLC dissector could be crashed, resulting 
        in denial of service.
    
    CVE-2014-2299
    
        Wesley Neelen discovered a buffer overflow in the MPEG file parser,
        which could lead to the execution of arbitrary code.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.2.11-6+squeeze14.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.8.2-5wheezy10.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.10.6-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your wireshark packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    
    
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"39","type":"x","order":"1","pct":50.65,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"11","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"27","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.06,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.