Debian: DSA-3406-1: nspr security update

    Date25 Nov 2015
    CategoryDebian
    122
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that incorrect memory allocation in the NetScape Portable Runtime library might result in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3406-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    	
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    November 25, 2015                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : nspr
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-7183
    
    It was discovered that incorrect memory allocation in the NetScape
    Portable Runtime library might result in denial of service or the
    execution of arbitrary code.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
    in version 2:4.9.2-1+deb7u3.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2:4.10.7-1+deb8u1.
    
    For the testing distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
    in version 2:4.10.10-1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2:4.10.10-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your nspr packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"37","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"10","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.89,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.72,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.