Debian: DSA-3425-1: tryton-server security update

    Date17 Dec 2015
    CategoryDebian
    52
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Cédric Krier discovered a vulnerability in the server-side of Tryton, an application framework written in Python. An aunthenticated malicious user can write arbitrary values in record fields due missed checks of access permissions when multiple records are written.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3425-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                            Luciano Bello
    December 17, 2015                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : tryton-server
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-0861
    
    Cédric Krier discovered a vulnerability in the server-side of Tryton, an
    application framework written in Python. An aunthenticated malicious
    user can write arbitrary values in record fields due missed checks of
    access permissions when multiple records are written.
    
    The oldstable distribution (wheezy) is not affected.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.4.0-3+deb8u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.8.1-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your tryton-server packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.11,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"3","pct":33.33,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.