Debian: DSA-3441-1: perl security update

    Date11 Jan 2016
    CategoryDebian
    80
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    David Golden of MongoDB discovered that File::Spec::canonpath() in Perl returned untainted strings even if passed tainted input. This defect undermines taint propagation, which is sometimes used to ensure that unvalidated user input does not reach sensitive code.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3441-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    January 11, 2016                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : perl
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-8607
    Debian Bug     : 810719
    
    David Golden of MongoDB discovered that File::Spec::canonpath() in Perl
    returned untainted strings even if passed tainted input. This defect
    undermines taint propagation, which is sometimes used to ensure that
    unvalidated user input does not reach sensitive code.
    
    The oldstable distribution (wheezy) is not affected by this problem.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 5.20.2-3+deb8u2.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem will be fixed soon.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your perl packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"9","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.14,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.