Debian: DSA-3907-1: spice security update

    Date11 Jul 2017
    CategoryDebian
    50
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Frediano Ziglio discovered a buffer overflow in spice, a SPICE protocol client and server library which may result in memory disclosure, denial of service and potentially the execution of arbitrary code.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3907-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    July 11, 2017                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : spice
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-7506
    
    Frediano Ziglio discovered a buffer overflow in spice, a SPICE protocol
    client and server library which may result in memory disclosure, denial
    of service and potentially the execution of arbitrary code.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed
    in version 0.12.5-1+deb8u5.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.12.8-2.1+deb9u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem will be fixed soon.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your spice packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":33.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":11.11,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.