Debian: DSA-3925-1: qemu security update

    Date04 Aug 2017
    CategoryDebian
    287
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple vulnerabilities were found in qemu, a fast processor emulator: CVE-2017-9524
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3925-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    August 04, 2017                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : qemu
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-9524 CVE-2017-10806 CVE-2017-11334
                     CVE-2017-11443
    Debian Bug     : 865755 869171 869173 867751 869945
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities were found in qemu, a fast processor emulator:
    
    CVE-2017-9524
    
        Denial of service in qemu-nbd server
    
    CVE-2017-10806
    
        Buffer overflow in USB redirector
    
    CVE-2017-11334
    
        Out-of-band memory access in DMA operations
    
    CVE-2017-11443
    
        Out-of-band memory access in SLIRP/DHCP
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your qemu packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"1","pct":61.54,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":23.08,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":15.38,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.