Debian: DSA-4047-1: otrs2 security update

    Date23 Nov 2017
    CategoryDebian
    146
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Two vulnerabilities were discovered in the Open Ticket Request System which could result in disclosure of database credentials or the execution of arbitrary shell commands by logged-in agents.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4047-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    November 23, 2017                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : otrs2
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-15864 CVE-2017-16664
    
    Two vulnerabilities were discovered in the Open Ticket Request System
    which could result in disclosure of database credentials or the
    execution of arbitrary shell commands by logged-in agents.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed
    in version 3.3.18-1+deb8u2.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 5.0.16-1+deb9u3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your otrs2 packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of otrs2 please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/otrs2
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.