Debian: DSA-4052-1: bzr security update

    Date29 Nov 2017
    CategoryDebian
    109
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Adam Collard discovered that Bazaar, an easy to use distributed version control system, did not correctly handle maliciously constructed bzr+ssh URLs, allowing a remote attackers to run an arbitrary shell command.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4052-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    November 29, 2017                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : bzr
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-14176
    Debian Bug     : 874429
    
    Adam Collard discovered that Bazaar, an easy to use distributed version
    control system, did not correctly handle maliciously constructed bzr+ssh
    URLs, allowing a remote attackers to run an arbitrary shell command.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed
    in version 2.6.0+bzr6595-6+deb8u1.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.7.0+bzr6619-7+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your bzr packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of bzr please refer to its security
    tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/bzr
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"40","type":"x","order":"1","pct":48.78,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.85,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"29","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.37,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.