Debian: DSA-4060-1: wireshark security update

    Date09 Dec 2017
    CategoryDebian
    447
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that wireshark, a network protocol analyzer, contained several vulnerabilities in the dissectors for CIP Safety, IWARP_MPA, NetBIOS, Profinet I/O and AMQP, which result in denial of dervice or the execution of arbitrary code.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4060-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    December 09, 2017                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : wireshark
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-11408 CVE-2017-13766 CVE-2017-17083 CVE-2017-17084 
                     CVE-2017-17085
    
    It was discovered that wireshark, a network protocol analyzer, contained
    several vulnerabilities in the dissectors for CIP Safety, IWARP_MPA,
    NetBIOS, Profinet I/O and AMQP, which result in denial of dervice or the
    execution of arbitrary code.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed
    in version 1.12.1+g01b65bf-4+deb8u12.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 2.2.6+g32dac6a-2+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your wireshark packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of wireshark please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/wireshark
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"40","type":"x","order":"1","pct":48.78,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.85,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"29","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.37,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.