Debian: DSA-4267-1: kamailio security update

    Date08 Aug 2018
    CategoryDebian
    3108
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Henning Westerholt discovered a flaw related to the To header processing in kamailio, a very fast, dynamic and configurable SIP server. Missing input validation in the build_res_buf_from_sip_req function could result in denial of service and potentially the execution of arbitrary code.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4267-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    August 08, 2018                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : kamailio
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-14767
    
    Henning Westerholt discovered a flaw related to the To header processing
    in kamailio, a very fast, dynamic and configurable SIP server. Missing
    input validation in the build_res_buf_from_sip_req function could result
    in denial of service and potentially the execution of arbitrary code.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 4.4.4-2+deb9u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your kamailio packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of kamailio please refer to its
    security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/kamailio
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.