Debian: DSA-4269-1: postgresql-9.6 security update

    Date10 Aug 2018
    CategoryDebian
    3823
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Two vulnerabilities have been found in the PostgreSQL database system: CVE-2018-10915
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4269-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    August 10, 2018                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : postgresql-9.6
    CVE ID         : CVE-2018-10915 CVE-2018-10925
    
    Two vulnerabilities have been found in the PostgreSQL database system:
    
    CVE-2018-10915
    
        Andrew Krasichkov discovered that libpq did not reset all its
        connection state during reconnects.
    
    CVE-2018-10925
    
        It was discovered that some "CREATE TABLE" statements could
        disclose server memory.
    
    For additional information please refer to the upstream announcement
    at https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1878/
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 9.6.10-0+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your postgresql-9.6 packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of postgresql-9.6 please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/postgresql-9.6
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":58.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":25,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":16.67,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.