Debian: 'gftp' vulnerability

    Date 08 May 2001
    2471
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    The gftp package as distributed with Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 has a problem in its logging code.
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-055-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 
    https://www.debian.org/security/                         Wichert Akkerman
    May  8, 2001
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    Package        : gftp
    Problem type   : printf format attack
    Debian-specific: no
    
    The gftp package as distributed with Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 has a problem
    in its logging code: it logged data received from the network but it did
    not protect itself from printf format attacks. An attacker can use this
    by making a FTP server return special responses that exploit this.
    
    This has been fixed in version 2.0.6a-3.1, and we recommend that you
    upgrade your gftp package.
    
    
    wget url
            will fetch the file for you
    dpkg -i file.deb
            will install the referenced file.
    
    
    Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 alias potato
    ---------------------------------
    
      Potato was released for alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc and sparc.
    
      Source archives:
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/source/gftp_2.0.6a-3.1.diff.gz
          MD5 checksum: 23df5107a21eaa36b3dcc50367bd3b46
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/source/gftp_2.0.6a-3.1.dsc
          MD5 checksum: b99704d17c10b1f2bbbb80d430b55d21
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/source/gftp_2.0.6a.orig.tar.gz
          MD5 checksum: 8eba39ab947712b46756b4e014b72e8c
    
      Alpha architecture:
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-alpha/gftp_2.0.6a-3.1_alpha.deb
          MD5 checksum: 7df9efccb67296eb2df1e070e66add80
    
      ARM architecture:
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-arm/gftp_2.0.6a-3.1_arm.deb
          MD5 checksum: 2d701b8c6c4f5e05ca8664a65cf2e8d3
    
      Intel ia32 architecture:
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-i386/gftp_2.0.6a-3.1_i386.deb
          MD5 checksum: 71b547eec5c5e24f9dca56882b5fbf8a
    
      Motorola 680x0 architecture:
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-m68k/gftp_2.0.6a-3.1_m68k.deb
          MD5 checksum: 4f824249dd40ed70ba3f373cbad1a790
    
      PowerPC architecture:
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-powerpc/gftp_2.0.6a-3.1_powerpc.deb
          MD5 checksum: 12d5e7b0b433d9eeefef48c31786ee83
    
      Sun Sparc architecture:
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-sparc/gftp_2.0.6a-3.1_sparc.deb
          MD5 checksum: c0de4c7a87d2dbb153bc6a67530ac0cc
    
      These packages will be moved into the stable distribution on its next
      revision.
    
    For not yet released architectures please refer to the appropriate
    directory  ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/binary-$arch/ .
    
    --
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    apt-get: deb  https://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
    dpkg-ftp:  ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security dists/stable/updates/main
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"1","pct":42.86,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.