Debian: 'sash' incorrection permissions

    Date 22 Jan 2001
    2747
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Versions of sash prior to 3.4-4 did not clone /etc/shadow properlywhich lead into readable files for anybody.
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-015-1                       This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 
    https://www.debian.org/security/                               Martin Schulze
    January 23, 2001
    - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : sash
    Vulnerability  : broken maintainer script
    Debian-specific: yes
    
    Versions of sash prior to 3.4-4 did not clone /etc/shadow properly
    which lead into readable files for anybody.  This was fixed by the
    Debian maintainer.
    
    This package only exists in stable, so if you are running unstable you
    won't see a bugfix unless you use the resources from the bottom of
    this message to the proper configuration.
    
    We recommend you upgrade your sash package immediately.
    
    wget url
            will fetch the file for you
    dpkg -i file.deb
            will install the referenced file.
    
    You may use an automated update by adding the resources from the
    footer to the proper configuration.
    
    
    Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 alias potato
    - ------------------------------------
    
      Potato was released for the alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc and sparc
      architectures.
    
    
      Source archives:
    
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/source/sash_3.4-6.diff.gz
          MD5 checksum: f65d5dfd23acc395b99651076e8029bd
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/source/sash_3.4-6.dsc
          MD5 checksum: c78f46d34405afcbaae29726dd9f8e89
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/source/sash_3.4.orig.tar.gz
          MD5 checksum: 9c631eb171371b69276ff6692100beb6
    
      Intel ia32 architecture:
    
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-i386/sash_3.4-6_i386.deb
          MD5 checksum: 4273648c65527f88855887f97bb6eeab
    
      Motorola 680x0 architecture:
    
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-m68k/sash_3.4-6_m68k.deb
          MD5 checksum: 7bc34c6c7b0b1f6793693853711c76ad
    
      Sun Sparc architecture:
    
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-sparc/sash_3.4-6_sparc.deb
          MD5 checksum: 1fdadd243c5aabc329edcb880dcd2581
    
      Alpha architecture:
    
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-alpha/sash_3.4-6_alpha.deb
          MD5 checksum: 57837ce03d6c55dad077d67cc18ed38a
    
      PowerPC architecture:
    
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-powerpc/sash_3.4-6_powerpc.deb
          MD5 checksum: b5bf950effb0517552e0056ce995120e
    
      ARM architecture:
    
         https://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-arm/sash_3.4-6_arm.deb
          MD5 checksum: d7e3253ef764c1bb10b04caafd7b9c30
    
    
      These files will be moved into
       ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/*/binary-$arch/ soon.
    
    For not yet released architectures please refer to the appropriate
    directory  ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/binary-$arch/ .
    
    - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    For apt-get: deb  https://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
    For dpkg-ftp:  ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security dists/stable/updates/main
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    Package info: `apt-cache show ' and  https://packages.debian.org/
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
    Comment: For info see  https://www.gnupg.org
    
    iD8DBQE6bNE0W5ql+IAeqTIRAgLoAJ9CohteWM4aVgKghMRRZ1JjiHcdbACfeYRe
    2SKtPRjH2k9IRbcwHZ6+RIw=
    =OHfM
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    
    
    
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"1","pct":42.86,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.