Debian: updated 'Boa' packages

    Date09 Oct 2000
    CategoryDebian
    3068
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    In versions of boa before 0.94.8.3, it is possible to access files outside of the server's document root by the use of properly constructed URL requests.
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    
    - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory                                 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 
    http://www.debian.org/security/                            Daniel Jacobowitz
    October 9, 2000
    - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package: boa
    Vulnerability: exposes contents of local files
    Debian-specific: no
    Vulnerable: yes
    
    In versions of boa before 0.94.8.3, it is possible to access files outside
    of the server's document root by the use of properly constructed URL
    requests.
    
    This problem is fixed in version 0.94.8.3-1, uploaded to Debian's unstable
    distribution on October 3, 2000.  Fixed packages are also available in
    proposed-updates and will be included in the next revision of Debian/2.2
    (potato).
    
    Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 alias slink
    - --------------------------------
    
      Slink contains Boa version 0.93.15.  This version is no longer supported;
      we recommend that slink users upgrade to potato, or recompile the current
      Boa packages on their slink systems.
    
    Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 (stable) alias potato
    - ------------------------------------------
    
      Fixes are currently available for Alpha, Intel ia32, Motorola 680x0,
      PowerPC and the Sun Sparc architectures, from the proposed-updates archive
      and from these URLs:
    
      Source archives:
        
    http://security.debian.org/dists/potato/updates/main/source/boa_0.94.8.3-1.dsc
          MD5 checksum: 85349ebced6a9b0d57ac718891f617e0
        
    http://security.debian.org/dists/potato/updates/main/source/boa_0.94.8.3-1.tar.gz
          MD5 checksum: 492b474bf0adf9e00e6289fe70b104ef
    
      Alpha architecture:
        
    http://security.debian.org/dists/potato/updates/main/binary-alpha/boa_0.94.8.3-1_alpha.deb
          MD5 checksum: 49bb09162ce840153779b5911cca29af
    
      Intel ia32 architecture:
        
    http://security.debian.org/dists/potato/updates/main/binary-i386/boa_0.94.8.3-1_i386.deb
          MD5 checksum: e8122856917c02ca23e03cf49fcdc3ed
    
      Motorola 680x0 architecture:
        
    http://security.debian.org/dists/potato/updates/main/binary-m68k/boa_0.94.8.3-1_m68k.deb
          MD5 checksum: 1670d6f1e57453e4a22e15175d398c7e
    
      PowerPC architecture:
        
    http://security.debian.org/dists/potato/updates/main/binary-powerpc/boa_0.94.8.3-1_powerpc.deb
          MD5 checksum: 9fdb496abcdc24f2234c1930bc9b9913
    
      Sun Sparc architecture:
        
    http://security.debian.org/dists/potato/updates/main/binary-sparc/boa_0.94.8.3-1_sparc.deb
          MD5 checksum: 7f4e1ac3afff1442fec6cd5b92ed2771
    
    Debian GNU/Linux Unstable alias woody
    - -------------------------------------
    
      This version of Debian is not yet released.
    
      Fixes are currently available for Alpha, Intel ia32, Motorola 680x0,
      PowerPC and the Sun Sparc architectures, in the Debian archives.  The
      stable packages listed above are also installable on current unstable
      systems.
    
    - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    For apt-get: deb  http://security.debian.org/ stable updates
    For dpkg-ftp:  ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security dists/stable/updates
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: 2.6.3a
    Charset: noconv
    
    iQCVAwUBOeIfAz5fjwqn/34JAQF2lgP/RhzGDvDb1n04V6a2yueuZ472h4woaxck
    G8ovdJ2wpzWBbTVBmLuDkZ5XdY/wyFlH+G4iMFyHKGYzGOLPLT+1clcxVm3ZLnH1
    Vbw0qnuZsKlayKtiUDGMHZuLYCkqVtxEjbGSm9i+ezEgKF3kpzCoIlr3oo+Cdulh
    5IEGqun5sNs=
    =K50w
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"65","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.27,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.2,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.