Fedora 20: echoping Security Update

    Date10 Apr 2015
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Updated to latest SVN, fixing various bugs
    Fedora Update Notification
    2015-02-26 02:34:10
    Name        : echoping
    Product     : Fedora 20
    Version     : 6.1
    Release     : 0.beta.r434svn.1.fc20
    URL         : http://echoping.sourceforge.net/
    Summary     : TCP performance test to measure response time of network hosts
    Description :
    Echoping is a small program to test (approximate) performances of a
    remote host by sending TCP "echo" (or other protocol, such as HTTP)
    Update Information:
    Updated to latest SVN, fixing various bugs
    * Wed Feb 25 2015 Andreas Thienemann  - 6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1
    - Updated to latest SVN, fixing #705174 and #1007031
    - Removed so versioning and fixed module loading, fixing #460557 and #1032547
    * Sat Aug 16 2014 Fedora Release Engineering  - 6.0.2-13
    - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild
    * Sat Jun  7 2014 Fedora Release Engineering  - 6.0.2-12
    - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
      [ 1 ] Bug #705174 - echoping: boundary error in SSL-related functions can lead to buffer overflow [fedora-all]
      [ 2 ] Bug #1007031 - echoping segfaults all the time
      [ 3 ] Bug #460557 - echoping : Package and software are in a desolate state
      [ 4 ] Bug #1032547 - echoping doesn't seem to work (cannot open shared object file)
    This update can be installed with the "yum" update program.  Use
    su -c 'yum update echoping' at the command line.
    For more information, refer to "Managing Software with yum",
    available at http://docs.fedoraproject.org/yum/.
    All packages are signed with the Fedora Project GPG key.  More details on the
    GPG keys used by the Fedora Project can be found at
    package-announce mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.