- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory                           GLSA 201612-05
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                                           https://security.gentoo.org/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Severity: Normal
    Title: Pygments: Arbitrary code execution
     Date: December 04, 2016
     Bugs: #564478
       ID: 201612-05

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Synopsis
=======
Pygments is vulnerable to remote code execution if an attacker is
allowed to specify the font name.

Background
=========
Pygments is a generic syntax highlighter suitable for use in code
hosting, forums, wikis or other applications that need to prettify
source code.

Affected packages
================
    -------------------------------------------------------------------
     Package              /     Vulnerable     /            Unaffected
    -------------------------------------------------------------------
  1  dev-python/pygments         < 2.0.2-r1               >= 2.0.2-r1 

Description
==========
A vulnerability in FontManager's _get_nix_font_path function allows
shell metacharacters to be passed in a font name.

Impact
=====
A remote attacker could possibly execute arbitrary code with the
privileges of the process.

Workaround
=========
There is no known workaround at this time.

Resolution
=========
All Pygments users should upgrade to the latest version:

  # emerge --sync
  # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=dev-python/pygments-2.0.2-r1"

References
=========
[ 1 ] CVE-2015-8557
      http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-8557

Availability
===========
This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at
the Gentoo Security Website:

 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-05

Concerns?
========
Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the
confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost
importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to
security@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at
https://bugs.gentoo.org.

License
======
Copyright 2016 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text
belongs to its owner(s).

The contents of this document are licensed under the
Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/

Gentoo: GLSA-201612-05: Pygments: Arbitrary code execution

Pygments is vulnerable to remote code execution if an attacker is allowed to specify the font name.

Summary

A vulnerability in FontManager's _get_nix_font_path function allows shell metacharacters to be passed in a font name.

Resolution

All Pygments users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=dev-python/pygments-2.0.2-r1"

References

[ 1 ] CVE-2015-8557 http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-8557

Availability

This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at the Gentoo Security Website: https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-05

Concerns

Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to security@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org.

Severity
Severity: Normal
Title: Pygments: Arbitrary code execution
Date: December 04, 2016
Bugs: #564478
ID: 201612-05

Synopsis

Pygments is vulnerable to remote code execution if an attacker is allowed to specify the font name.

Background

Pygments is a generic syntax highlighter suitable for use in code hosting, forums, wikis or other applications that need to prettify source code.

Affected Packages

------------------------------------------------------------------- Package / Vulnerable / Unaffected ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 dev-python/pygments < 2.0.2-r1 >= 2.0.2-r1

Impact

===== A remote attacker could possibly execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the process.

Workaround

There is no known workaround at this time.

Related News